{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":2,"sheets":["Mapping","Main"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":5,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Mapping","index":0,"n_rows":141,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":141,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[112,3,113,3],[112,4,113,4],[1,3,2,3],[1,4,2,4],[9,0,10,0],[9,1,10,1],[9,2,10,2]]}
["Consolidated Note","Revision Date","Consolidated Name","1LMX Note ID","Consolidated Name","Comments",null,"*REFERENCE ONLY*"]
["MFC-AS-001","2017-08-07","Product Safety Awareness - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-001","Quality, Safety, and Ethics Awareness",null,null,"any QR Text Key in red that starts with CST* is an exact copy of the current MFC QR Text Key"]
["MFC-AS-002","2017-08-07","Product or Service Conformity Awareness - Autoflow",null,null,null,null,"https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/suppliers/mfc/mfc-quality-qr-text-keys-cross-reference-matrix_04-02-2026.xlsx"]
["MFC-CC-001","2024-04-25","Supplier Process Change Control - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-006","Supplier Process Change Control and Notification Requirements"]
["MFC-CC-002","2024-09-26","Pac-3 Supplier Notification of Change","CST-SQ-001"]
["MFC-CC-003","2016-12-01","Requirements Flowdown - Autoflow ","1LM-SQ-002","Sub-tier Requirements Flowdown"]
["MFC-CC-004","2023-05-30","Supplier Facility or Operations Change Notification","1LM-SQ-006","Supplier Process Change Control and Notification Requirements"]
["MFC-DC-001","2023-05-30","Supplier Retention of Quality and Inspection Records - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-009","Quality Record Retention"]
["MFC-DC-002","2022-10-04","Electronic Submission of Data - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-005","Electronic Data Submission and Barcode"]
["MFC-DC-003","2023-05-31","Certificate of Conformance","1LM-TR-301","Certificate of Conformance - Standard"]
[null,null,null,"1LM-TR-302","Certificate of Conformance - Hard Copy"]
["MFC-DC-004","2017-01-19","PAC-3 Parts Library","CST-TR-001"]
["MFC-DC-005","2017-01-19","Tool Certification","CST-TR-300"]
["MFC-DC-006","2017-01-19","Acceptance Test Procedure","1LM-TS-001","Acceptance Test Procedure - Buyer Approval"]
["MFC-DC-007","2017-01-19","Gear Test Tape","CST-TS-001"]
["MFC-DC-008","2017-01-19","As Built Configuration List","1LM-EN-002","Configuration Management"]
["MFC-DC-009","2017-04-18","Chemical/Physical Test Reports","1LM-TS-004","Raw Material Test Reports"]
["MFC-DC-010","2017-01-19","Inspection Data","CST-TR-301"]
["MFC-DC-011","2017-01-19","Failure Analysis","1LM-TS-010","Failure Analysis Report / Cannot Verify Failure Report "]
["MFC-DC-012","2017-04-18","X-ray Data","1LM-TS-103","X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) - Seller Performed"]
["MFC-DC-013","2017-05-08","Qualification Test","1LM-TS-014","Qualification Test"]
["MFC-DC-014","2017-01-19","Electrical Test Data","1LM-TS-018","Electrical Test Data"]
["MFC-DC-015","2017-01-19","Supplier Acceptance Tool / Test Equipment Design Review ","CST-TS-002"]
["MFC-DC-016","2017-01-19","Workmanship Spec EPS-CHM-0004 - Chelmsford","CST-EN-001"]
["MFC-DC-017","2017-01-19","Material And Process Specification","CST-EN-002"]
["MFC-DC-018","2020-09-01","Functional Test Reports","1LM-TS-005","Acceptance Test Report"]
["MFC-DC-019","2017-04-18","Ultrasonic Data","1LM-TS-008","Ultrasonic Data"]
["MFC-DC-020","2024-08-06","Special Process Approvals","1LM-CQ-102","Special Process Control - Seller Identify from Drawing"]
["MFC-DC-021","2024-08-06","Seller Control of Sub-Tier Special Processes","1LM-CQ-103","Seller Control of Sub-Tier Special Processes"]
["MFC-DC-022","2018-01-10","Screening / Lot Acceptance Test Summary Sheet","1LM-TS-015","Screening / Lot Acceptance Test Summary Sheet"]
["MFC-DC-023","2024-07-17","Seller Approved for Special Processes\n","1LM-CQ-104","Seller Approved for Special Processes"]
["MFC-DC-024","2023-05-30","Language - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-003","Documentation Language"]
["MFC-IN-001","2017-03-13","Return Material Test/Inspection Failure Verification","CST-IN-200"]
["MFC-IN-002","2017-03-13","Production Line Validation","1LM-IN-203","PRODUCTION LINE VALIDATION"]
["MFC-IN-003","2024-05-16","First Article Inspection - 12 Months","1LM-IN-102","First Article Requirement - 12 Months"]
["MFC-IN-004","2024-05-16","First Article Inspection - 24 Months","1LM-IN-101","First Article Requirement – Standard"]
["MFC-IN-006","2022-03-31","100% Pind Screening ","1LM-TS-016","100% Pind Screening "]
["MFC-IN-007","2017-03-13","Variation Management - AS9103","1LM-SQ-111","Variation Management - AS9103"]
["MFC-IN-008","2016-03-13","Variability Reduction ","CST-IN-201"]
["MFC-IN-009","2017-03-13","Casting Tensile Specimens","CST-IN-202"]
["MFC-IN-010","2017-03-13","Lot Acceptance Inspections For Annular Ring","CST-IN-203"]
["MFC-IN-011","2017-03-13","Tooling/Equipment Documentation-Control- Accountability","1LM-SQ-106","Buyer Furnished / Government Furnished Tooling / Equipment"]
["MFC-IN-012","2018-09-17","Production Process Baseline Assessment (PPB) Review","1LM-IN-206","Production Process Baseline Assessment (PPB) Review"]
["MFC-IN-013","2017-03-13","First Piece Inspection ","1LM-IN-021","First Piece 100% Inspection - Report"]
["MFC-IN-014","2017-03-13","100% Inspection","1LM-IN-022","All Units - 100% Inspection - Report"]
["MFC-IN-015","2017-03-13","In-process Visual Weld Inspection","1LM-IN-004","IN-PROCESS VISUAL WELD INSPECTION"]
["MFC-IN-016","2017-03-13","Pre-Cap Inspection","1LM-IN-005","Precap Inspection"]
["MFC-IN-017","2017-03-13","In-Process Inspection","1LM-IN-003","In-Process Inspection"]
["MFC-IN-018","2018-02-01","Weight Data","1LM-EN-102","Weight Data"]
["MFC-IN-019","2017-11-01","Inspection Plan","1LM-IN-202","Seller Inspection Plan Approval"]
["MFC-IN-021","2024-05-16","First Article Inspection – 12 Months With Refresh","1LM-IN-104","First Article Inspection – 12 Months with Refresh"]
["MFC-IN-022","2024-05-16","First Article Inspection – 24 Months With Refresh","1LM-IN-105","First Article Inspection – 24 Months with Refresh"]
["MFC-IN-023","2022-10-04","Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)","1LM-IN-006","Production Part Approval Process - PPAP"]
["MFC-PK-001","2023-03-22","Commercial Packaging - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-012","Packaging"]
["MFC-PK-002","2023-03-22","Electrostatic Discharge Protection (High Reliability)","1LM-EN-402","Electrostatic Discharge Protection Packaging - High Reliability"]
["MFC-PK-003","2024-02-14","Component Packaging","1LM-EN-202","Component Packaging"]
["MFC-PK-004","2017-05-08","Special Packaging/Shipping Instructions","1LM-EN-208","Special Packaging/Shipping Instructions"]
["MFC-PK-005","2017-08-07","Packaging Requirements for Printed Wiring Boards (PWBs)","1LM-EN-205","Printed Wire Board (PWB) Packaging"]
["MFC-PK-006","2018-02-01","Moisture Sensitive Devices","1LM-EN-203","Moisture Sensitive Devices Packaging"]
["MFC-PK-007","2017-04-18","Drop Shipment","1LM-SQ-103","Drop Ship"]
["MFC-PK-008","2017-04-18","Optics Handling","1LM-EN-209","Optics Handling"]
["MFC-PK-009","2017-04-18","Packaging of Part Containing Beryllium","CST-EN-200"]
["MFC-PK-010","2017-08-07","Hazard Warning Labels","1LM-PG-110 ","Hazardous Material Labels"]
["MFC-PK-011","2017-05-08","Chip Component Packaging","CST-EN-201"]
["MFC-PR-001","2023-05-08","Revision Level Control - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-011","Material Revision Control"]
["MFC-PR-002","2023-05-31","Material Review Authority - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-008","Control of Nonconforming Product / Material Review Process"]
["MFC-PR-003","2023-05-30","Counterfeit Part Prevention - Autoflow ","1LM-SQ-004","Counterfeit Avoidance"]
["MFC-PR-004","2023-05-31","Supplier Corrective Action Request - Autoflow","1LM-SQ-010","Corrective Action, Preventive Action, Request and Reporting"]
["MFC-PR-005","2023-05-31","Right of Access","1LM-SQ-007","Facility Access"]
["MFC-PR-006","2017-01-12","Ammunition (AMMO) Data Card","1LM-PG-001 ","Data AMMO Cards - MIL-STD-1168"]
["MFC-PR-007","2017-01-17","Ordnance Identification Requirements ","1LM-EN-210","Ordnance Identification Requirements "]
["MFC-PR-008","2023-05-31","Foreign Object Debris / Damage Prevention","1LM-SQ-108","Foreign Object Detection (FOD) Prevention"]
["MFC-PR-009","2023-01-17","Pure Tin Restriction","1LM-EN-004","Pure Tin Restrictions"]
["MFC-PR-010","2017-01-17","Alternate Component Finishes","CST-EN-003"]
["MFC-PR-011","2017-01-24","Shelf Life Control for Seller Managed Consumables","1LM-TR-203","Shelf Life Control for Seller Managed"]
["MFC-PR-012","2024-05-16","Unique Identification of Tangible Assets (UID)","1LM-TR-011","Item Unique Identifier (IUID) - Data Submittal"]
["MFC-PR-013","2017-01-17","PWB Moisture & Solderability Control Label","1LM-EN-301","PWB Moisture and Solderability Control Label"]
["MFC-PR-014","2023-05-31","Government / Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP)","1LM-SQ-109","Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) Membership"]
["MFC-PR-015","2017-01-17","Gas Cylinder Identification","CST-EN-300"]
["MFC-PR-016","2017-01-17","Casting / Forging Qualification Samples","CST-IN-204"]
["MFC-PR-017","2017-01-17","Casting / Forging Production Samples","CST-IN-205"]
["MFC-PR-018","2017-01-17","Product Substitution Prohibited","1LM-SQ-013","Part Substitution Requirements"]
["MFC-PR-019","2017-01-17","Statement of Work / Statement of Requirements Flowdown","1LM-SQ-104","Statement Of Work/Statement Of Requirements Flowdown"]
["MFC-PR-020","2017-08-07","Control of Shelf Life or Perishable Materials","1LM-TR-201 ","Control of Shelf Life or Perishable Materials"]
["MFC-PR-021","2017-01-17","Subcontractor Quality Plan Required","CST-IN-206"]
["MFC-PR-022","2017-01-17","Rigid Flex Board Requirements","CST-EN-004"]
["MFC-PR-023","2017-01-17","Contains PWB IAW Class 3 of IPC 6012, IPC 6013 or IPC 6018","1LM-EN-005","Printed Wire Board (PWB) - Manufacturing IAW Class 3 of IPC 6012, IPC 6013, or IPC 6018"]
["MFC-PR-024","2017-01-17","PWB Coupon and Record Retention","1LM-TS-007","Printed Wire Board (PWB) Retain Microsections and Test Coupons"]
["MFC-PR-025","2017-01-17","Nonconformance Control","CST-IN-207"]
["MFC-PR-026","2017-01-17","Deliverable & Non-Deliverable Software Quality Requirements","1LM-EN-003","Embedded Software Requirements"]
["MFC-PR-027","2017-01-17","Sub-Contractor Software Management – CMMI SEI Level 3","CST-IN-208"]
["MFC-PR-028","2024-09-23","Model Based Data Set Engineering Requirements","CST-IN-209"]
["MFC-PR-029","2023-07-10","Five Year Date Code Age Limit","1LM-TR-125","Date Code Limit Five Years"]
["MFC-PR-030","2017-01-17","Date Marking on Rubber and Synthetic Elastomers","1LM-TR-102","Cure Date Required"]
["MFC-PR-031","2017-01-17","Six Year Date Code Age Limit","1LM-TR-126","Date Code Limit Six Years"]
["MFC-PR-033","2018-02-01","Mixed Welding Gas","CST-EN-005"]
["MFC-PR-034","2017-08-07","Special Process Plating Rework Approval Notification","CST-IN-210"]
["MFC-PR-035","2017-08-07","SIE/STE/ATE","CST-IN-211"]
["MFC-PR-036","2017-11-02","IPT Controlled Released Vaulted Drawings","CST-EN-100"]
["MFC-PR-037","2023-07-10","Four Year Date Code Age Limit","1LM-TR-124","Date Code Limit Four years"]
["MFC-PR-038","2023-07-12","One Year Date Code Age Limit","1LM-TR-121","Date Code limit one year"]
["MFC-QM-001","2023-03-30","AS9100D:2016 Quality Management System - No Exclusions","1LM-CQ-001 ","AS9100D:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM-WITH DESIGN"]
["MFC-QM-002","2023-03-30","AS9100D:2016 Quality Management System - With Exclusions","1LM-CQ-002","AS9100D:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM-NO DESIGN"]
["MFC-QM-005","2023-03-30","ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System - No Exclusions","1LM-CQ-010","ISO 9001:2015 QMS CERTIFICATION - WITH DESIGN"]
["MFC-QM-006","2023-03-30","ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System - With Exclusions","1LM-CQ-011","ISO 9001:2015 QMS CERTIFICATION - NO DESIGN"]
["MFC-QM-009","2023-03-30","AS9120 Distributor Quality System Requirements","1LM-CQ-031","AS 9120 DISTRIBUTOR QUALITY SYSTEM REQMTS"]
["MFC-QM-010","2023-03-30","AS9003 Inspection and Test Quality System","1LM-CQ-032","AS 9003 INSPECTION AND TEST QUALITY SYSTEM "]
["MFC-QM-011","2023-10-26","Missiles & Fire Control – Minimum Quality Control System / Sales Office","1LM-CQ-033","SO-SQA-009 SALES OFFICE QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENT"]
["MFC-QM-012","2023-03-30","AIAG IATF 16949:2016 Quality Management System/ISO 9001:2015 Automotive Requirement-No Design","1LM-CQ-021","AIAG IATF 16949:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYS ISO9001:2015-WITH EXCLUSION"]
["MFC-QM-013","2018-03-08","ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories","1LM-CQ-302","ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories"]
["MFC-QM-014","2018-09-17","Supplier Control of Sub-Tier Processes","CST-IN-212"]
["MFC-QM-015","2023-03-30","AIAG IATF 16949:2016 Quality Management System/ISO 9001:2015 Automotive Requirement-With Design","1LM-CQ-020","AIAG IATF 16949:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYS ISO 9001:2015-NO EXCLUSION"]
["MFC-SS-001","11/1/2017","Verified Supplier Surveillance Program","1LM-CQ-202","Verified Supplier Surveillance Program"]
["MFC-SS-006","2017-11-01","Supplier Surveillance Process"]
["MFC-SS-002","2019-11-22","Government Assessment","1LM-SQ-112","Government Assessment"]
["MFC-SS-003","2019-11-22","Government Source Inspection","1LM-IN-002","Government Source Inspection"]
["MFC-SS-004","2024-07-23","Purchase Order Review","1LM-IN-201","Purchase Order Review"]
["MFC-SS-005","2023-02-02","Lockheed Martin Source Inspection","1LM-IN-001","Source Inspection Required"]
["MFC-SS-007","2020-12-23","Control and Verification of Tangible Items List or United States Government (USG) Owned Hardware Prior to Sell-Off","CST-TR-302"]
["MFC-TR-001","2017-01-12","Serial Number Traceability - Seller","1LM-TR-001","Serial Number Traceability – Seller"]
["MFC-TR-002","2023-08-14","Batch Traceability","1LM-TR-106","Lot/Batch/Heat Traceability"]
["MFC-TR-003","2017-01-12","Single Date Code/Manufacturer","CST-TR-100","Single Lot Date Code"]
["MFC-TR-004","2017-01-12","Non-Standard Electronic Piece Parts - Specification Verification","1LM-TS-013","Non-Standard Electronic Piece Parts - Specification Verification"]
["MFC-TR-005","2017-01-12","Single Lot Date Code","1LM-TR-104","Single Lot Date Code"]
["MFC-TR-006","2017-01-12","Serial Number Traceability - Buyer","1LM-TR-002","Serial Number Traceability – Buyer"]
["MFC-TR-007","2017-01-12","Single Lot, Batch or Heat Treat Lot ","1LM-TR-106","Lot/Batch/Heat Traceability"]
["MFC-TS-001","2023-08-24","Solderability Testing","1LM-TS-101 ","Solderability Testing - Seller"]
["MFC-TS-002","2018-09-17","Buyer Solderability Testing","1LM-TS-102","Solderability Testing - Buyer"]
["MFC-TS-003","2018-02-01","Cable and Wire Spark Testing","1LM-TS-011","Cable and Wire Spark Test Report"]
["MFC-TS-004","2017-11-01","Statistical Process Control (SPC)","1LM-SQ-105","Statistical Process Control (SPC)"]
["MFC-TS-005","2018-02-01","Electrical Testing of Printed Wiring Boards","1LM-TS-006","Electrical Testing of Printed Wiring Boards (PWB)"]
["MFC-TS-006","2018-02-01","Particle Impact Noise Detection (PIND)","1LM-TS-017","Particle Impact Noise Detection (PIND)"]
["MFC-TS-007","2017-01-12","Film Epoxy Testing","CST-TS-200"]
["MFC-TS-008","2017-01-12","Group A Electrical Testing","1LM-TS-019","Group A Electrical Testing"]
["MFC-TS-009","2017-01-12","Group B Acceptance Testing","1LM-TS-020","Group B Acceptance Testing"]
["MFC-TS-010","2017-01-12","Element Evaluation","CST-TR-303"]
["MFC-TS-011","2017-01-12","Destructive Physical Analysis","1LM-TS-201 ","Destructive Physical Analysis (DPA) - Supplier Performed"]
["MFC-TS-012","2024-11-21","Construction Analysis","CST-TS-201"]
["MFC-TS-013","2019-06-10","Statistical Methods Control","CST-IN-213"]
["MFC-TS-014","2017-08-07","Product and Process Requirements","CST-EN-006"]
["MFC-TS-015","2017-08-07","Destructive Internal Visual Inspection Physical Analysis","CST-TS-202"]

{"sheet":"Main","index":1,"n_rows":156,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":156,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["1LMX QR Text Key","Short Text","Long Text","Old QR Text Key","Old Long Text"]
["1LM-CQ-001","AS9100D:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM-WITH DESIGN","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain certification with the requirements of AS9100D:2016, \"Quality Management Systems - Aerospace Requirements\" with design.\r\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted.","MFC-QM-001","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard AS9100D:2016, \"Quality Management Systems - Aerospace Requirements\" with no exclusions, as a minimum.\n\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted."]
["1LM-CQ-002","AS9100D:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM-NO DESIGN","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain certification with the requirements of AS9100D:2016, \"Quality Management Systems - Aerospace Requirements\" with design exclusions.\r\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted. ","MFC-QM-002","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard AS9100D:2016, \"Quality Management Systems - Aerospace Requirements\" with exclusions, as a minimum.\n\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted."]
["1LM-CQ-010","ISO 9001:2015 QMS CERTIFICATION - WITH DESIGN","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain compliance with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, \"Quality Management Systems\" with design.\r\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted. ","MFC-QM-005","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard ISO 9001:2015, \"Quality Management Systems\" with no exclusions, as a minimum.\n\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted."]
["1LM-CQ-011","ISO 9001:2015 QMS CERTIFICATION - NO DESIGN","Seller shall comply with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, \"Quality Management Systems\" with design exclusions.\r\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted.","MFC-QM-006","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard ISO 9001:2015, \"Quality Management Systems\" with exclusions, as a minimum.\n\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted."]
["1LM-CQ-020","AIAG IATF 16949:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYS ISO9001:2015-WITH EXCLUSION","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain compliance with the requirements of AIAG IATF 16949:2016, \"Automotive Quality Management System\" with design exclusions.\r\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted.  ","MFC-QM-015","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard to IATF 16949:2016, \"Quality Management Systems\", as a minimum.\n\nOnly certifications completed by an IATF (International Automotive Task Force) accredited company will be accepted."]
["1LM-CQ-021","AIAG IATF 16949:2016 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYS ISO 9001:2015-NO EXCLUSION","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain compliance with the requirements of AIAG IATF 16949:2016, \"Automotive Quality Management System\" with design.\r\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted.  ","MFC-QM-012","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard to IATF 16949:2016, \"Quality Management Systems\", as a minimum.\n\nOnly certifications completed by an IATF (International Automotive Task Force) accredited company will be accepted."]
["1LM-CQ-031","AS 9120 DISTRIBUTOR QUALITY SYSTEM REQMTS","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain compliance with the requirements of AS 9120, \"Distributor Quality System Requirements\".\r\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted.  ","MFC-QM-009","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard AS9120, “Quality Management Systems – Aerospace Requirements for Stocking Distributors”, as a minimum.\n\nOnly certifications completed by an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited company will be accepted."]
["1LM-CQ-032","AS 9003 INSPECTION AND TEST QUALITY SYSTEM ","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain compliance with the requirements of AS 9003, \"Inspection and Test Quality System\".","MFC-QM-010","Seller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard AS9003, “Inspection and Test Quality System”, as a minimum.\n\nCompliance to a higher level requirement such as IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited AS9100 or ISO9001 shall satisfy compliance to AS9003.\n\nSuccessful completion of a Buyer’s AS9003 survey will be required for Seller compliance if the above criteria is not met."]
["1LM-CQ-033","SO-SQA-009 SALES OFFICE QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENT","Seller shall provide approval evidence and maintain compliance with the requirements of SO-SQA-009, \"Sales Office Quality Systems\".","MFC-QM-011","Manufacturer's inspection system shall achieve and maintain certification(s) from an IAF (International Accreditation Forum) accredited registrar to the industry standard quality management system(s) of AS9100, ISO9001, or Buyer's Quality System (QS) AS9003 survey, Nadcap AC7004 or IATF16949 (International Automotive Task Force) as a minimum.\n\nSeller shall provide and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS) to an industry recognized Quality Standard (or Buyer approved equivalent) (Examples of possible QMS requirements include: AS9100, AS9110, AS9120, ISO9001, AS9003, Nadcap AC7004 or IATF16949) and in compliance with any other specific quality requirements identified in this Contract.\n\nAny exceptions to these QS requirements shall require written approval from the Buyer.\n\nAll Distributors shall ensure that all purchased material is obtained directly from the original manufacturer.  When such is not possible, the distributor shall notify the Buyer and request a written approval plan to support any exception shipments."]
["1LM-CQ-101","Special Process Control - PO Requirements","Special processes are identified in the Purchase Order (PO) using a 10-digit PO code.\nProcessor (Seller and/or Sub-tier) shall have current, required Lockheed Martin approval(s), including both Quality Management Systems (QMS) and special process approvals in P2P at the time of material processing through completion of processing. Sellers that are approved to manage their own special processes approvals know who you are and should follow the guidance of that process. \nProcessor (Seller and/or Sub-tier) shall have current required LM approval(s) in place at the time of material processing. Seller shall verify such approval prior to performing processing.\nSeller is responsible for contacting the Buyer to request an LM survey 90 days prior to a Lockheed Martin (LM) survey expiration date at the seller’s facility or their sub-tier’s facility.\nLockheed Martin approval of sub-tier special processing does not relieve the Seller of the responsibility to ensure that work performed by sub-tier contractors is in accordance with specification requirements and PO codes.\nSeller is responsible to ensure that sub-tier suppliers with a Quality only profile, (Qxxxxxxxxx) Supplier ID, maintain an approved QMS (AS9100/ISO 9001/AS9003/ AC7004) and required special process approvals in Exostar prior to processing through completion of processing.\n\nSeller shall review and plan for special process requirements at the time of PO receipt. Possible gates/error proofing can be placed in a traveler, shop work order or router to verify current QMS and Special Process approval are in Exostar while material is being processed.\nTo look up supplier special process approvals: Log into Lockheed Martin Procure to Pay (P2P) Portal\n\nFor additional questions, including expirations coming due, review Exostar current approvals, contact the Buyer.\nMethods for obtaining LM special process approval:\n- Special Process Approval by an on-site survey by Lockheed Martin or Lockheed Martin acceptance of third-party accreditation.\n- Accepted certifications include International Accreditation Forum (I.A.F.) certified bodies, Nadcap and A2LA, IPC, and ESDA that are provided to LM for loading into the LM special process management system.\n\nSpecial Process Definition - A documented method used to manufacture products where:\nWhen a product undergoes a physical, chemical or metallurgical transformation or inspection, conformance to the specification cannot be readily verified by normal inspection methods, and the quality of the product depends on use of specific equipment operated in a specific manner, under controlled conditions, by trained personnel with instructions, procedures and standards. \nAll Welding, Brazing, Additive Manufacturing, and Lockheed Martin Controlled Special Process Specifications shall be approved in the Buyer's Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal, including those provided by sub-tier special process suppliers.","",0]
["1LM-CQ-102","Special Process Control - Seller Identify from Drawing","Special processes referenced by specification within the Lockheed Martin Engineering Design shall be identified, documented and maintained by the Seller.  The Lockheed Martin Approval Code sheet (LMAC) – “Active\" tab may be used as a reference to identify special process specifications, approval codes, and required supplemental approvals (Example: AMS2759/9 requires AMS2759 and AMS2750).\nA copy of 'Approval Code (LMAC) Sheet' with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\nContact the Buyer to confirm when specification(s) is/are not found within LMAC.\nProcessor (Seller and/or Sub-tier) shall have current required LM approval(s) in place at the time of material processing. Seller shall verify such approval prior to performing processing.\n\nSpecial Process Definition - A documented method used to manufacture products where:\nWhen a product undergoes a physical, chemical or metallurgical transformation or inspection, conformance to the specification cannot be readily verified by normal inspection methods, and the quality of the product depends on use of specific equipment operated in a specific manner, under controlled conditions, by trained personnel with instructions, procedures and standards. \nAll Welding, Brazing, Additive Manufacturing, and Lockheed Martin Controlled Special Process Specifications shall be approved in the Buyer's P2P internet portal, including those provided by sub-tier special process suppliers.\nSeller is responsible for contacting the Buyer to request a LM survey 90 days prior to a LM survey expiration date at the seller's facility or their sub-tier's facility.\n\nOnly suppliers listed as approved for these specific special processes within P2P may be used in the manufacture of the Buyer's contracted articles.\nSpecial processes for IPC or ESD specifications require approval in the Buyer's Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal, Nadcap accreditation, IPC accreditation or ESDA accreditation.\nAll remaining special processes require either Buyer's Quality Representative approval or Nadcap accreditation, as follows:\n\nTo view the Buyer's approved special process suppliers list; search within the Lockheed Martin Procure to Pay (P2P) Portal:  http://www.myexostar.com. Log on with your User ID and password, then select the \"Current Approvals\" tab and search by PO Note number/description or by specification number to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the Nadcap approved process suppliers list; search the eAuditNet website:\nhttps://www.eauditnet.com/eauditnet/ean/user/login.htm\nSearch by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the IPC approved process suppliers list; search the IPC website:\nhttps://www.ipc.org/standards/ipc-validation-services\nSearch by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the ESD approved process suppliers list; search the ESDA website:\nhttps://www.esda.org/certification/eosesd-association-esd-facility-certification/esd-certified-facilities/\n\nPrior to selecting/using a Nadcap special process supplier, the Seller and/or sub-tier suppliers shall contact the selected Nadcap special process supplier and confirm that they currently perform the specific Type, Class, Method, etc. per the associated drawing requirements.\nSeller shall have documentation records available providing objective evidence of adherence to this PO Note requirement. Buyer reserves the right to access these records upon request.\nRefer to the following link for Special Process Management guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#quality","MFC-DC-020","DEFINITIONS\nSpecial Process Definition - A documented method used to manufacture products where:\n\nWhen a product undergoes a physical, chemical or metallurgical transformation or inspection, conformance to the specification cannot be readily verified by normal inspection methods, and the quality of the product depends on use of specific equipment operated in a specific manner, under controlled conditions, by trained personnel with instructions, procedures and standards.\n\nSpecial processes referenced by specification within the Lockheed Martin Engineering Design and/or contract shall be identified, documented and maintained by the Seller.  The Lockheed Martin Approval Code sheet (LMAC) – “Active\" tab may be used as a reference to identify special process specifications, approval codes, and required supplemental approvals (Example: AMS2759/9 requires AMS2759 and AMS2750).\n\nA copy of 'Approval Code (LMAC) Sheet' with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\n\nContact the Buyer's Procurement Representative to confirm when specification(s) is/are not found within LMAC. When a military specification and/or standard has been cancelled and/or replaced, Seller shall contact the Buyer to determine the applicable specification and its revision.\n\nREQUIREMENTS\nProcessor (Seller and/or Sub-tier) shall have current required approval(s) in place at the time of hardware processing at the Seller and/or Sub-tier manufacturing/processing location. Seller shall verify such approval prior to performing processing.\n\nSeller is responsible for contacting the Buyer's Procurement Representative to request a LM survey 90 days prior to a LM survey expiration date at the seller's facility or their sub-tier's facility.\n\nApproval requirements for special processes are based on the following criteria:\n\nAll Welding, Brazing, Additive Manufacturing, and Lockheed Martin Controlled Special Process Specifications shall be approved in the Buyer's Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal, including those provided by sub-tier special process suppliers. Only suppliers listed as approved for these specific special processes within P2P may be used in the manufacture of the Buyer's contracted articles.\n\nSpecial processes for IPC or ESD specifications require approval in the Buyer's Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal, Nadcap accreditation, IPC accreditation or ESDA accreditation.\n\nAll remaining special processes require either approval within Buyer's Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal or Nadcap accreditation, as follows:\n\nTo view the Buyer's approved special process suppliers list; search within the Lockheed Martin Procure to Pay (P2P) Portal:  http://www.myexostar.com. Log on with your User ID and password, then select the \"Current Approvals\" tab and search by PO Note number/description or by specification number to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the Nadcap approved process suppliers list; search the eAuditNet website: https://www.eauditnet.com/eauditnet/ean/user/login.htm.  Search by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the IPC approved process suppliers list; search the IPC website:\nhttps://www.electronics.org/ipc-standards/validation-services. Search by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the ESD approved process suppliers list; search the ESDA website:\nhttps://www.esda.org/certification/eosesd-association-esd-facility-certification/esd-certified-facilities/\n\nPrior to selecting/using a Nadcap special process supplier, the Seller and/or sub-tier suppliers shall contact the selected Nadcap special process supplier and confirm that they currently perform the specific Type, Class, Method, etc. per the associated drawing requirements.\n\nSeller shall have documentation records available providing objective evidence of adherence to this PO Note requirement. Buyer reserves the right to access these records upon request.\n\nRefer to the following link for Special Process Management guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#quality"]
["1LM-CQ-103","Seller Control of Sub-Tier Special Processes","Special processes referenced by specification within the Lockheed Martin Engineering Design shall be identified, documented and maintained by the Seller.  The Lockheed Martin Approval Code sheet (LMAC) – “Active\" tab may be used as a reference to identify special process specifications, approval codes, and required supplemental approvals (Example: AMS2759/9 requires AMS2759 and AMS2750).\nA copy of 'Approval Code (LMAC) Sheet' with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\nContact the Buyer to confirm when specification(s) is/are not found within LMAC.\nProcessor (Seller) shall have current required LM approval(s) in place at the time of material processing. Seller shall verify such approval prior to performing processing. Sub-Tier Processor shall have current required approval(s) in place at the time of material processing.\n\nSpecial Process Definition - A documented method used to manufacture products where:\nWhen a product undergoes a physical, chemical or metallurgical transformation or inspection, conformance to the specification cannot be readily verified by normal inspection methods, and the quality of the product depends on use of specific equipment operated in a specific manner, under controlled conditions, by trained personnel with instructions, procedures and standards.\n\n*First Tier (Seller)* - Any special processes performed under this contract by the Seller for welding, brazing, additive manufacturing, and Lockheed Martin Controlled Special Process Specifications shall be approved in P2P. Special processes for IPC or ESD specifications require approval in P2P, Nadcap accreditation, IPC accreditation, or ESDA accreditation. This requirement shall be flowed down to related sub-tier suppliers. All remaining special processes performed under this contract by the Seller require either a Buyer's Quality Representative approval or Nadcap accreditation.\nSeller is responsible for contacting the Buyer to request a LM survey 90 days prior to a LM survey expiration date at the seller's facility or their sub-tier's facility.\n*Sub-Tier* - Welding, brazing, additive manufacturing, and Lockheed Martin Controlled Special Process Specifications shall be approved in P2P. Seller may control all remaining sub-tier special process suppliers or utilize one that is approved by the Buyer, Nadcap, IPC or ESDA. Seller shall assure all sub-tier special process suppliers are capable and qualified to perform the special process in accordance with the specification.\n\nTo view the Buyer's approved special process suppliers list; search within the Lockheed Martin Procure to Pay (P2P) Portal:  http://www.myexostar.com. Log on with your User ID and password, then select the \"Current Approvals\" tab and search by PO Note number/description or by specification number to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the Nadcap approved process suppliers list; search the eAuditNet website:\nhttps://www.eauditnet.com/eauditnet/ean/user/login.htm\nSearch by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the IPC approved process suppliers list; search the IPC website:\nhttps://www.ipc.org/standards/ipc-validation-services\nSearch by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the ESD approved process suppliers list; search the ESDA website:\nhttps://www.esda.org/certification/eosesd-association-esd-facility-certification/esd-certified-facilities/\n\nPrior to selecting/using a Nadcap special process supplier, the Seller and/or sub-tier suppliers shall contact the selected Nadcap special process supplier and confirm that they currently perform the specific Type, Class, Method, etc. per the associated drawing requirements.\nSeller shall have documentation records available providing objective evidence of adherence to this PO Note requirement. Buyer reserves the right to access these records upon request.\nRefer to the following link for Special Process Management guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#quality","MFC-DC-021","DEFINITIONS\nSpecial Process Definition - A documented method used to manufacture products where:\n\nWhen a product undergoes a physical, chemical or metallurgical transformation or inspection, conformance to the specification cannot be readily verified by normal inspection methods, and the quality of the product depends on use of specific equipment operated in a specific manner, under controlled conditions, by trained personnel with instructions, procedures and standards.\n\nSpecial processes referenced by specification within the Lockheed Martin Engineering Design and/or contract shall be identified, documented and maintained by the Seller.  The Lockheed Martin Approval Code sheet (LMAC) – “Active\" tab may be used as a reference to identify special process specifications, approval codes, and required supplemental approvals (Example: AMS2759/9 requires AMS2759 and AMS2750).\n\nA copy of 'Approval Code (LMAC) Sheet' with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\n\nContact the Buyer's Procurement Representative to confirm when specification(s) is/are not found within LMAC. When a military specification and/or standard has been cancelled and/or replaced, Seller shall contact the Buyer to determine the applicable specification and its revision.\n\nREQUIREMENTS\nProcessor (Seller and/or Sub-tier) shall have current required approval(s) in place at the time of hardware processing at the Seller and/or Sub-tier manufacturing/processing location. Seller shall verify such approval prior to performing processing. Sub-Tier Processor shall have current required approval(s) in place at the time of hardware processing.\n\nSeller is responsible for contacting the Buyer's Procurement Representative to request a LM survey 90 days prior to a LM survey expiration date at the seller's facility or their sub-tier's facility.\n\nApproval requirements for special processes are based on the following criteria:\n\n*First Tier (Seller)* - Any special processes performed under this contract by the Seller for welding, brazing, additive manufacturing, and Lockheed Martin Controlled Special Process Specifications shall be approved in Buyer’s Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal. Special processes for IPC or ESD specifications require approval in the Buyer's Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal, Nadcap accreditation, IPC accreditation or ESDA accreditation. This requirement shall be flowed down to related sub-tier suppliers. All remaining special processes performed under this contract by the Seller require either approval within Buyer's Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal or Nadcap accreditation.\n\n*Sub-Tier* - Welding, brazing, additive manufacturing, and Lockheed Martin Controlled Special Process Specifications shall be approved in Buyer’s Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal. Seller may control all remaining sub-tier special process suppliers or utilize one that is approved by the Buyer’s Procure to Pay (P2P) internet portal , Nadcap, IPC or ESDA. Seller shall assure all sub-tier special process suppliers are capable and qualified to perform the special process in accordance with the specification.\n\nSpecial Process Suppliers Approval Status:\nTo view the Buyer's approved special process suppliers list search within the Lockheed Martin Procure to Pay (P2P) Portal:  http://www.myexostar.com. Log on with your User ID and password, then select the \"Current Approvals\" tab and search by PO Note number/description or by specification number to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the Nadcap approved process suppliers list; search the eAuditnet website:  https://www.eauditnet.com/eauditnet/ean/user/login.htm\nSearch by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the IPC approved process suppliers; list search the IPC website: https://www.electronics.org/ipc-standards/validation-services.\nSearch by the supplier's name and address to view the approved special process suppliers.\n\nTo view the ESD approved process suppliers list; search the ESDA website: https://www.esda.org/certification/eosesd-association-esd-facility-certification/esd-certified-facilities/\n\nDocumentation Requirements:\nSeller shall have documentation records available providing objective evidence of adherence to this PO Note requirement. Buyer reserves the right to access these records upon request.\n\nRefer to the following link for Special Process Management guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#quality"]
["1LM-CQ-104","Seller Approved for Special Processes","Seller, when designing or using a Buyer's engineering specification(s)/design to produce the item(s) under contract shall identify, document and have sole control over any and all special processes/special processors referenced by specification in the design. The Lockheed Martin Approval Code sheet (LMAC) – “Active” tab may be used as a reference to identify special process specifications, approval codes, and required supplemental approvals (Example: AMS2759/9 requires AMS2759 and AMS2750).\nA copy of 'Approval Code (LMAC) Sheet' with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\nContact the Buyer to confirm when specification(s) is/are not found within LMAC.\n\nProcessor (Seller and/or Sub-tier) shall have current required approval(s) in place at the time of hardware processing. Seller shall verify such approval prior to performing processing.\n\nSpecial Process Definition - A documented method used to manufacture products where:\nWhen a product undergoes a physical, chemical or metallurgical transformation or inspection, conformance to the specification cannot be readily verified by normal inspection methods, and the quality of the product depends on use of specific equipment operated in a specific manner, under controlled conditions, by trained personnel with instructions, procedures and standards.\n\nSeller shall be responsible to assure all special process providers are capable and qualified to perform the special process in accordance with specification requirements.\nObjective evidence of surveys shall be retained by the Seller and is subject to the Buyer's periodic audit.\n\nA copy of the special process provider's certificate of compliance that certifies each process was accomplished in accordance with the applicable specification shall be available for review by the Buyer as objective evidence the special process was performed to the specification requirements.\nRefer to the following link for Special Process Management guidance\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#quality","MFC-DC-023","DEFINITIONS\nSpecial Process Definition - A documented method used to manufacture products where:\n\nWhen a product undergoes a physical, chemical or metallurgical transformation or inspection, conformance to the specification cannot be readily verified by normal inspection methods, and the quality of the product depends on use of specific equipment operated in a specific manner, under controlled conditions, by trained personnel with instructions, procedures and standards.\n\nSeller, when designing or using a Buyer's engineering specification(s)/design to produce the item(s) under contract shall identify, document and have sole control over any and all special processes/special processors referenced by specification in the design. The Lockheed Martin Approval Code sheet (LMAC) – “Active” tab may be used as a reference to identify special process specifications, approval codes, and required supplemental approvals (Example: AMS2759/9 requires AMS2759 and AMS2750).\n\nA copy of 'Approval Code (LMAC) Sheet' with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\n\nContact the Buyer’s Procurement Representative to confirm when specification(s) is/are not found within LMAC. When a military specification and/or standard has been cancelled and/or replaced, Seller shall contact the Buyer to determine the applicable specification and its revision.\n\nREQUIREMENTS\nSeller shall be responsible to assure all special process providers are capable and qualified to perform the special process in accordance with specification requirements.\n\nProcessor (Seller and/or Sub-tier) shall have current required approval(s) in place at the time of hardware processing at the Seller and/or Sub-tier manufacturing/processing location. Seller shall verify such approval prior to performing processing.\n\nObjective evidence of surveys shall be retained by the Seller and is subject to the Buyer's periodic audit.\n\nA copy of the special process provider's certificate of compliance that certifies each process was accomplished in accordance with the applicable specification shall be available for review by the Buyer as objective evidence the special process was performed to the specification requirements.\n\nRefer to the following link for Special Process Management guidance\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#quality"]
["1LM-CQ-105","Special Process Usage Reporting ","Seller must keep records of all special processing activities conducted for Buyer, including those performed on Buyer Items or using approved sources. A quarterly Usage Report detailing these activities must be submitted to Buyer within 15 days of quarter-end, even if no approved sources were used. Report should include processing activities in the following categories:\n1. Seller subcontracting special processing to approved sources\n2. Seller performing special processes on Buyer Items for other suppliers\n3. Seller performing special processes on Buyer Items it manufactures\n4. Seller's sub-tier manufacturing sources subcontracting special processing to approved sources\nNote: Usage Reporting is not necessary for Special Processes performed for non-Buyer POs.","",0]
["1LM-CQ-201","DIGITAL PRODUCT DEFINITION DATA APPROVAL","The supplier and/or sub-tier supplier(s) used for this process shall conform to the Digital Product Definition Data (DPDD) requirements which must be approved by Lockheed Martin's quality representatives. Reference ASME Y14.41 for additional guidance. A list of LM approved suppliers can be found within the Lockheed Martin Procure to Pay (P2P) Portal. ","",0]
["1LM-CQ-202","VERIFIED SUPPLIER SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM","Material delivered against this purchase order requires oversight performed by Buyer’s Supplier Surveillance. Seller shall partner with the Buyer under the guidelines of the Supplier Surveillance Program. Activities may include the following but not limited to:\n- Purchase Order Review or Contract Validation\n- Special Process Compliance Assessment\n- Production/Process Assessment\n- Lean Six Sigma/6S/FOD Control Assessment\n- Packaging and Shipment\n- Risk Assessment\n- Corrective Action Follow-Up (CAFU)\n- Quality Management System Assessment\n- Inspection and Test Methods Evaluations\n- Mandatory Inspection Points (MIPs)\n- Drawing/Specification Configuration Reviews\n- First Article Inspection Validation\n- Material Compliance Audits\n- Software Management Assessments\n- In-Process Inspection\n- In-Process Surveillance \nBuyer reserves the right to perform surveillance activities at Seller's facility and/or Seller's Sub-tiers as agreed upon by both parties. Buyer and Seller shall develop a schedule and activities that are mutually acceptable to both parties.  Schedule and activities may be subject to change depending on program requirements, personnel schedules, findings, supplier needs, etc., however all changes will be coordinated in advance.","MFC-SS-001","Material delivered against this purchase order requires oversight performed by Buyer’s Supplier Surveillance. Seller shall partner with the Buyer under the guidelines of the Supplier Surveillance Program.  Activities may include the following:\n\n- Purchase Order Review or Contract Validation\n- Special Process Compliance Assessment\n- Production/Process Assessment\n- Lean Six Sigma/6S/FOD Control Assessment\n- Packaging and Shipment\n- Risk Assessment\n- Corrective Action Follow-Up (CAFU)\n- Quality Management System Assessment\n- Inspection and Test Methods Evaluations\n- Mandatory Inspection Points (MIPs)\n- Drawing/Specification Configuration Reviews\n- First Article Inspection Validation\n- Material Compliance Audits\n- Software Management Assessments\n- In-Process Inspection\n- In-Process Surveillance \n\nBuyer reserves the right to perform surveillance activities at Seller's facility and/or Seller's Sub-tiers as agreed upon by both parties. Buyer and Seller shall develop a schedule and activities that are mutually acceptable to both parties.  Schedule and activities may be subject to change depending on program requirements, personnel schedules, findings, supplier needs, etc., however all changes will be coordinated in advance."]
["1LM-CQ-301","General Calibration Requirement","Seller shall maintain a system for calibration and maintenance of tools, jigs, inspection, and test equipment that is appropriate to the Seller's type of business. This may be a component of the Seller's QMS or a calibration process compliant to an industry recognized calibration standard (ISO/IEC 17025, ISO Q10012, NAVSEA 04-7434B, etc.).","",0]
["1LM-CQ-302","ISO/IEC 17025 - General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories","Seller shall be certified to ISO/IEC 17025, \"General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories\".\r\nOnly certifications completed by a national/international accreditation body will be accepted.","",0]
["1LM-CQ-303","ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q10012 - Measurement management systems","Seller shall comply with the requirements of ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q10012, \"Measurement management systems Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment\".\r\nOnly certifications completed by an ILAC MRA (ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement) Signatory body will be accepted.","",0]
["1LM-CQ-304","NAVSEA 04-4734B - Navy and Marine Corps Calibration Laboratory Audit/Certification Manual, 1 Dec 2006","Seller shall comply with the requirements of NAVSEA 04-4734B, \"Navy and Marine Corps Calibration Laboratory Audit/Certification Manual\".\r\nOnly certifications completed by an ILAC MRA (ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement) Signatory body will be accepted.","",0]
["1LM-CQ-310","ISO/IEC 17025 OR ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q10012 – Calibration","Seller shall be certified to ISO/IEC 17025 \"General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories\" or ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q10012 \"Measurement management systems Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment\".\r\nOnly certifications completed by an ILAC MRA (ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement) Signatory body will be accepted.","MFC-QM-013"," \nSeller shall comply with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025, \"General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories\", as a minimum.\n \nOnly certifications completed by an ILAC MRA (ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement) Signatory body will be accepted.\n"]
["1LM-EN-001","Critical Characteristics","The Seller shall perform a 100% inspection of all critical characteristics identified in Lockheed Martin's engineering documents and provide a certificate of compliance with each shipment. The certificate must include a list of verified critical characteristics, recorded results, contractor name, part number, purchase order number, serial number (if applicable), and quantity of parts shipped. The certificate shall be validated by a representative from Seller's Quality Department with an electronic signature, physical signature, or inspection stamp with the date completed. \n\nThe Seller shall electronically upload the measured values and test/inspection records through the Source Inspection / Pre-Ship Inspection Order in the Apriso Supplier Portal.","",0]
["1LM-EN-002","Configuration Management","The seller shall provide one (1) reproducible copy of the as built configuration status of the assemblies with each shipment. The listing shall be identified by assembly serial number.\n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal.","MFC-DC-008","Each shipment shall be accompanied by one (1) reproducible copy of the \"as built\" configuration status of the assemblies controlled by the Buyer. The listing shall be identified by assembly serial number and include sub-assembly serial numbers when specified in the TDP (technical data package).\n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment."]
["1LM-EN-003","Embedded Software Requirements","A. Seller shall implement and maintain a Software Quality program or methodology acceptable to Buyer for engineering design, development, testing and delivery of standalone or embedded software products associated with this Purchase Order (PO).\nB. Seller shall define and maintain an infrastructure to support its software development and testing, that includes, as applicable:\n- Software development tools and utilities, including host computer and support software;\n- Software verification tools and utilities, including test equipment, test software, vulnerability scanners, code scanners, etc;\n- Equipment, tools and utilities for archiving and storage, disaster recovery protection, replication, software loading, transmittal, record retention, software quality, change management, and configuration management; Integrity verification tools and utilities (e.g., virus protection/checking, digital signatures, security hash algorithms, and CRC);\n- Equipment and software needed to meet retention requirements; and Security for software environments against attacks (e.g., malicious code, enumeration, fingerprints, worms, viruses, backdoors, and spyware).\nC. Seller shall implement, and comply with, its Quality Plan, Software Quality Program Plan (“SQPP”) or Systems/Software Quality Program Plan (“SSQPP”), which shall be organized and documented in Seller’s format and shall define Seller's software and software quality planning. Seller’s SSQPP or SQPP is subject to Buyer’s approval or disapproval. Buyer reserves the right to conduct periodic evaluations of Seller's compliance with the SQPP or SSQPP.  The SQPP or SSQPP can be standalone or included in the Program Quality Assurance Plan or Software Development Plan.\nD. Seller shall include in its Software Quality program or methodology the review and audit of software development processes, products and activities, as required by Seller, in order to ensure compliance with applicable planning, procedures and standards. Seller shall provide internal and Buyer visibility into Software Quality program trends in its program.\nE. Seller shall establish and maintain, as part of its Software Quality program as required by this PO, a system which provides for evaluation of each test station/test software used in the automated manufacturing of deliverable hardware or in the qualification or acceptance of deliverable software or hardware. Seller shall ensure this system provides for the following:\nRequired functions of the test station/test software are defined, in writing, and objective evidence exists prior to the intended use of such test station/test software, that such test station/test software performs the required functions.\nThe test station/test software is placed under internal configuration control prior to its use, and such internal configuration control is maintained throughout its use.\nF. Buyer’s software quality representatives shall have the right to conduct in-process inspection of Seller’s software development process defined in the Quality Plan, SQPP or SSQPP, and to evaluate Seller's compliance with Seller’s internal procedures and other applicable documents at Seller’s facilities.","MFC-PR-026","A. Seller shall implement and maintain a Software Quality program or methodology acceptable to Buyer for engineering design, development, testing and delivery of standalone or embedded software products associated with this Purchase Order (PO).\n\nB. Seller shall define and maintain an infrastructure to support its software development and testing, that includes, as applicable:\n- Software development tools and utilities, including host computer and support software;\n- Software verification tools and utilities, including test equipment, test software, vulnerability scanners, code scanners, etc;\n- Equipment, tools and utilities for archiving and storage, disaster recovery protection, replication, software loading, transmittal, record retention, software quality, change management, and configuration management;_Integrity verification tools and utilities (e.g., virus protection/checking, digital signatures, security hash algorithms, and CRC);\n- Equipment and software needed to meet retention requirements; and_Security for software environments against attacks (e.g., malicious code, enumeration, fingerprints, worms, viruses, backdoors, and spyware).\n\nC. Seller shall implement, and comply with, its Quality Plan, Software Quality Program Plan (“SQPP”) or Systems/Software Quality Program Plan (“SSQPP”), which shall be organized and documented in Seller’s format and shall define Seller's software and software quality planning. Seller’s SSQPP or SQPP is subject to Buyer’s approval or disapproval. Buyer reserves the right to conduct periodic evaluations of Seller's compliance with the SQPP or SSQPP.  The SQPP or SSQPP can be standalone or included in the Program Quality Assurance Plan or Software Development Plan.\n\nD. Seller shall include in its Software Quality program or methodology the review and audit of software development processes, products and activities, as required by Seller, in order to ensure compliance with applicable planning, procedures and standards. Seller shall provide internal and Buyer visibility into Software Quality program trends in its program.\n\nE. Seller shall establish and maintain, as part of its Software Quality program as required by this PO, a system which provides for evaluation of each test station/test software used in the automated manufacturing of deliverable hardware or in the qualification or acceptance of deliverable software or hardware. Seller shall ensure this system provides for the following:\nRequired functions of the test station/test software are defined, in writing, and objective evidence exists prior to the intended use of such test station/test software, that such test station/test software performs the required functions.\nThe test station/test software is placed under internal configuration control prior to its use, and such internal configuration control is maintained throughout its use.\n\nF. Buyer’s software quality representatives shall have the right to conduct in-process inspection of Seller’s software development process defined in the Quality Plan, SQPP or SSQPP, and to evaluate Seller's compliance with Seller’s internal procedures and other applicable documents at Seller’s facilities."]
["1LM-EN-004","Pure Tin Restrictions","The use of unalloyed or pure tin in the internal or external construction of electrical, electronic and electromechanical (EEE) parts is prohibited without Buyer written approval. Product that does not contain any tin (Sn) or tin (Sn) alloys meets the requirements of this Purchase Order (PO) note.  Tin Silver Copper (SAC) alloys with less than or equal to 97% tin (Sn) by weight meets the requirements of this Purchase Order (PO) note. Tin-plated electrical wire compliant to applicable military or industrial standards is considered standard and is not restricted.\nUnless otherwise specified by the text of this Purchase Order (PO) note or the Procurement Specification document, the solder, plating and coating of the products supplied on this purchase order shall meet the following pure tin restriction:\n1. The solder used shall contain a material composition of  less than or equal to 97% tin (Sn) by weight and the remainder shall be any combination of silver (Ag) and/or lead (Pb).\n2. All plating or coating utilized to manufacture the deliverable hardware shall contain a minimum of 3% lead (Pb) by weight; this includes all associated hardware that is a part of a EEE component.\nDefinitions:\nSolder: A metal alloy with a melting temperature that is below 427°C [800 °F].\nPlating/coating: a thin layer of metal such as tin deposited on or applied to a single surface\nExamples:  electrolytic plating, solder dipped leads, solder dipped housings\nThe Seller shall notify the Buyer prior to any change by the Seller or its Sub-Tier(s) that would result in products specified in this PO becoming noncompliant by incorporating this requirement. Also, notify Buyer if this requirement conflicts with the Engineering specified for products ordered under this PO. Noncompliance to this requirement must be approved in writing from the Buyer prior to acceptance of this PO.","MFC-PR-009","The use of unalloyed or pure tin in the internal or external construction of electrical, electronic and electromechanical (EEE) parts is prohibited without Buyer written approval. Product that does not contain any tin (Sn) or tin (Sn) alloys meets the requirements of this Purchase Order (PO) note.  Tin Silver Copper (SAC) alloys with less than or equal to 97% tin (Sn) by weight meets the requirements of this Purchase Order (PO) note. Tin-plated electrical wire compliant to applicable military or industrial standards is considered standard and is not restricted.\n \nUnless otherwise specified by the text of this Purchase Order (PO) note or the Procurement Specification document, the solder, plating and coating of the products supplied on this purchase order shall meet the following pure tin restriction:\n \n1. The solder used shall contain a material composition of  less than or equal to 97% tin (Sn) by weight and the remainder shall be any combination of silver (Ag) and/or lead (Pb).\n \n2. All plating or coating utilized to manufacture the deliverable hardware shall contain a minimum of 3% lead (Pb) by weight; this includes all associated hardware that is a part of a EEE component.\n\nDefinitions:\n\nSolder: A metal alloy with a melting temperature that is below 427°C [800 °F].\nPlating/coating: a thin layer of metal such as tin deposited on or applied to a single surface\n \nExamples:  electrolytic plating, solder dipped leads, solder dipped housings\n \nThe Seller shall notify the Buyer’s Procurement Representative prior to any change by the Seller or its Sub-Tier(s) that would result in products specified in this PO becoming noncompliant by incorporating this requirement. Also, notify Buyer’s Procurement Representative if this requirement conflicts with the Engineering specified for products ordered under this PO.  Noncompliance to this requirement must be approved in writing from the Buyer prior to acceptance of this PO."]
["1LM-EN-005","Printed Wire Board (PWB) - Manufacturing IAW Class 3 of IPC 6012, IPC 6013, or IPC 6018","Items delivered under this Purchase Order which contain packaged Printed Wiring Boards (PWB) within the assembly shall be subject to the following:\r\n1. Printed wiring board types must be manufactured in accordance with Class 3 of IPC 6012, IPC 6013 or IPC 6018 requirements.  \r\n2. Seller shall maintain test/inspection compliance records and provide to Buyer upon request.","MFC-PR-023","Items delivered under this Purchase Order which contain packaged Printed Wiring Boards (PWB) within the assembly shall be subject to the following:\n\n1. Printed wiring board types must be manufactured in accordance with Class 3 of IPC 6012, IPC 6013 or IPC 6018  requirements.  \n2. Seller shall maintain test/inspection compliance records and provide to Buyer upon request.\n"]
["1LM-EN-006","Solvent Container - Unused Containers","To prevent contamination by residual material, all solvents shall be supplied only in a new container that has not been previously used.","",0]
["1LM-EN-102","Weight Data","Seller shall weigh each part per engineering requirements or as referenced in the drawing title reference block and provide weight data in English/Metric units as applicable for each item with shipment.\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to each shipment.","MFC-IN-018","Seller shall weigh each part per engineering requirements or as referenced in the drawing title reference block and provide weight data in English/Metric units as applicable for each item with shipment.\n \nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to each shipment."]
["1LM-EN-201","Individually Package","Parts shall be individually wrapped, bagged, or otherwise protected when packaged within a larger pack to prevent part-to-part contact/damage during handling, shipment, and storage.","",0]
["1LM-EN-202","Component Packaging","The parts referenced on this Purchase Order (PO) have been identified as requiring subsequent automated handling. A Tape & Reel configuration shall contain a single lot date code, single part number, and single manufacturer.\n\nComponents shall be provided in accordance with one of the standard packaging requirements specified below:\n1. Tape and Reel:  Single Part numbers shall be supplied in reeled packaging on the minimum number of reels to satisfy the quantity ordered per the following applicable standard and consist of a Single Manufacturer Lot Date Code. Use the smallest reel possible to accommodate the total PO line item quantity.\n\nNOTE: Tape and Reel Requirement will be defined in the PO line item.\n\n1.a Surface Mount:  Per ECIA EIA-481 on reels no larger than 332mm (13 inches) in diameter.  Use the smallest reel possible to accommodate the total PO line item quantity.  One lot date code per reel, tape reel quantity no less than 250 minimum per reel unless the Purchase Order Quantity is less than 250 (in which case the full PO line item quantity shall be on one reel). Any partial shipments less than 250 require Buyer approval and will be documented in the PO text. \n1.b Radial Leads:  Per ECIA EIA-468\n1.c Axial Leads:  Per ECIA EIA-296 with the following options:\n1. If the maximum body length is less than 13mm or the maximum body diameter/width is less than 5mm, the inside tape spacing shall be 53mm and component pitch shall be 5mm.\n2. If the body dimensions are greater than above.\n3. The inside tape spacing shall be any ECIA EIA-296 option, except 26mm shall not be used.\n4. Component pitch shall be 5 or 10mm.\n\n2. Tubes: parts shall be supplied in accordance with JEDEC JEP130.\n3. Matrix trays: parts shall be supplied in accordance with IEC 60286-5.\n4. PEM/PED's shall be labeled and packaged in accordance with IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033. PEM/PED's with a Moisture Sensitivity Level (MSL) other than level 1, as defined in IPC/JEDEC J-STD-020 Para 9.a., shall require dry pack in accordance with IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033.","MFC-PK-003","The parts referenced on this Purchase Order (PO) have been identified as requiring subsequent automated handling. A Tape & Reel configuration shall contain a single lot date code, single part number, and single manufacturer.\n\nComponents shall be provided in accordance with one of the standard packaging requirements specified below:\n\nTape and Reel:  Single Part numbers shall be supplied in reeled packaging on the minimum number of reels to satisfy the quantity ordered per the following applicable standard and consist of a Single Manufacturer Lot Date Code. Use the smallest reel possible to accommodate the total PO quantity.\nNOTE: Tape and Reel Requirement will be defined in the PO line item.\n\nSurface Mount:  Per ECIA EIA-481 on reels no larger than 332mm (13 inches) in diameter.  Use the smallest reel possible to accommodate the total PO quantity.  One lot date code per reel, tape reel quantity no less than 250 minimum per reel unless the Purchase Order Quantity is less than 250 (in which case the full PO quantity shall be on one reel). Any partial shipments less than 250 require Buyer approval and will be documented in the PO text.\n\nRadial Leads:  Per ECIA EIA-468\n\nAxial Leads:  Per ECIA EIA-296 with the following options:\n1.  If the maximum body length is less than 13mm or the maximum body diameter/width is less than 5mm, the inside tape spacing shall be 53mm and component pitch shall be 5mm.\n2.  If the body dimensions are greater than above.\n    a.  The inside tape spacing shall be any ECIA EIA-296 \toption, except 26mm shall not be used.\n    b.  Component pitch shall be 5 or 10mm.\n\nTubes: parts shall be supplied in accordance with JEDEC JEP130.\n\nMatrix trays: parts shall be supplied in accordance with IEC 60286-5.\n\nPEM/PED's shall be labeled and packaged in accordance with IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033. PEM/PED's with a Moisture Sensitivity Level (MSL) other than level 1, as defined in IPC/JEDEC J-STD-020 Para 9.a., shall require dry pack in accordance with IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033."]
["1LM-EN-203","Moisture Sensitive Devices Packaging","This component is considered moisture sensitive and shall be processed, packaged, and identified in accordance with the latest revision of IPC/JEDEC J-STD-020 (moisture/reflow sensitivity classification for nonhermetic solid state surface mount devices) and IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033 (handling, packing, shipping and use of moisture/reflow sensitive surface mount devices).","MFC-PK-006","This component is considered moisture sensitive and shall be processed, packaged, and identified in accordance with the latest revision of IPC/JEDEC J-STD-020 (moisture/reflow sensitivity classification for nonhermetic solid state surface mount devices) and IPC/JEDEC J-STD-033 (handling, packing, shipping and use of moisture/reflow sensitive surface mount devices).\n\nUnless single date/lot code is required in the Purchase Order, different lot date code products shall be provided in separate packaging (one date code per package)."]
["1LM-EN-204","Kit Packaging","Each part shall be individually kit-packed, with a kit containing all necessary components for assembling a single complete part. For parts made up of multiple components, bulk packaging of components is not allowed.","",0]
["1LM-EN-205","Printed Wire Board (PWB) Packaging","Seller shall individually package PWBs in accordance with one option listed below:\n     Option 1: Sealed dry nitrogen, vapor barrier, ESD bag\n     Option 2: Vacuum sealed, vapor barrier, ESD bag containing one activated desiccant bag (MIL-D-3464 Types I and II) \nSeller shall label each individual bag with part number, revision level of drawing, work order number/ lot number, Purchase Order (PO) number, PO item date, date of solderability test, and serial number. \nSeller shall wrap individually packaged PWBs with anti-static bubble-wrap or form and pack in a shipping container to prevent damage to the sealed bags during shipment. \nIf drawing specified packaging / labeling requirements are present, those requirements shall take precedence over labeling and packaging requirements listed here.\nIf mounts/coupons are required, they shall be bagged separately from the PWB, but may be attached to the PWB bag.\nNote: Staples shall not be used on the bag. ","MFC-PK-005","Seller shall individually package PWBs in accordance with one of the options listed below: \n Option 1: Sealed dry nitrogen, vapor barrier, ESD bag\n Option 2: Vacuum sealed, vapor barrier, ESD bag containing one activated desiccant bag (MIL-D-3464 Types I and II)\n\nSeller shall label each individual bag with part number, revision level of drawing, work order number/lot number, purchase order (PO) number, PO item number, date of solderability test and serial number\n\nSeller shall wrap individually packaged PWBs with anti-static bubble-wrap or foam and pack in a shipping container to prevent damage to the sealed bags during shipment. \n\nNote: Do not staple anything to the bag."]
["1LM-EN-206","Caps and Plugs","The supplier shall package connectors with the appropriate caps and plugs to prevent damage during handling, shipment, and storage. ","",0]
["1LM-EN-207","Import/Export Lumbar Requirements","This procurement results in an import/export shipment, so if lumber is used as packaging material, then the shipment must comply with 7CFR 319 Subpart I. A certificate of conformance shall accompany the shipment stating compliance to 7CFR 319 Subpart I.\nNon-compliant shipments will be returned at the supplier's expense.","",0]
["1LM-EN-208","Special Packaging/Shipping Instructions","Article is considered sensitive and is susceptible to transportation and/or environmental damage.\nMethod of packaging and/or shipping of sensitive articles shall be listed separately under purchase order (PO) text by Buyer. If no method is stated, the Seller’s proposed method of packaging and/or shipping of sensitive articles shall be presented to the Buyer and be approved by the Buyer's Quality Engineering prior to initial shipment.\nFailure to comply with this requirement without prior written authorization will result in the return of the shipment to the Seller at the Seller’s expense.\nThis PO note takes precedence over Buyer’s Commercial Packaging note (1LM-SQ-012).","MFC-PK-004","Article is considered sensitive and is susceptible to transportation and/or environmental damage.\n\nMethod of packaging and/or shipping of sensitive articles shall be listed separately under purchase order (PO) text by Buyer. If no method is stated, the Seller’s proposed method of packaging and/or shipping of sensitive articles shall be presented to the Buyer's Procurement Representative and be approved by the Buyer's Quality Engineering prior to initial shipment.\n\nFailure to comply with this requirement without prior written authorization will result in the return of the shipment to the Seller at the Seller’s expense.\n\nThis PO note takes precedence over Buyer’s Commercial Packaging note (MFC-PK-001)."]
["1LM-EN-209","Optics Handling","Optical elements, sub-assemblies and assemblies containing optics shall be wrapped and packaged to avoid damage during shipment including, but not limited to, chips, scratches, stains, surface contamination and breakage.","MFC-PK-008","Optical elements, sub-assemblies and assemblies containing optics shall be wrapped and packaged to avoid damage during shipment including, but not limited to, chips, scratches, stains, surface contamination and breakage. "]
["1LM-EN-210","Ordnance Handling Procedures","Fifteen (15) days prior to shipment of the First Article of a Class 1 Explosive, a drawing or sketch and specification sufficient to inspect, assemble, check out, test, and store this material must be delivered to the Buyer to be provided to the site Environmental Health and Safety team.\nThe documentation shall contain the following information:\n1. The identity and weight of explosive(s)\n2. Maximum sensitivity of the explosive(s) (mechanical, electrical, and/or thermal),\n3. Seller's drawing or part number, lot number, year of manufacture, and serial number of each component as applicable\n4. Copy of Seller’s Acceptance Test Procedure\n5. Department of transportation shipping documents that identify storage and shipping net explosive weight (e.g. Interim Hazard Classification (IHC), Final Hazard Classification (EX-Letter), etc.)\n\nSeller's acceptance test procedure shall include:\n1. Minimum current for \"all fire\"\n2. Maximum current for \"no fire\"\n3. Recommended check out procedure\n4. Environmental limitations","MFC-PR-007","Fifteen (15) days prior to shipment of the First Article of a Class 1 Explosive, a drawing or sketch and specification sufficient to inspect, assemble, check out, test, and store this material must be forwarded to Lockheed Martin, Attention:  Manager Safety Department, of the facility/address where your product is to be delivered, together with the following information:\n(1) The identity and weight of explosive(s)\n(2) Maximum sensitivity of the explosive(s) (mechanical,\n    electrical, and/or thermal),\n(3) Seller's drawing or part number, lot number, year of\n    manufacture, and serial number of each component as\n    applicable\n(4) Copy of Seller’s Acceptance Test Procedure\n(5) Department of transportation shipping documents that\n    identify storage and shipping net explosive weight (e.g.\n    Interim Hazard Classification (IHC), Final Hazard\n    Classification (EX-Letter), etc.)\n\nSeller's acceptance test procedure shall include:\n(1)  Minimum current for \"all fire\"\n(2)  Maximum current for \"no fire\"\n(3)  Recommended check out procedure\n(4)  Environmental limitations"]
["1LM-EN-220","Commercial Packaging - ASTM D3951","Preservation, packaging, and packing of all deliverable goods shall be in accordance with the latest revision of ASTM D3951 - \"Standard Practice for Commercial Packaging\"","",0]
["1LM-EN-221","Military Packaging - MIL-STD-2073","Preservation, packaging, and packing of all deliverable goods shall be in accordance with the latest revision of MIL-STD-2073 - \"Standard Practice for Military Packaging\".  ","",0]
["1LM-EN-222","Elastomeric Packaging - SAE AS5316","Preservation, packaging, and packing of all deliverable goods shall be in accordance with the latest revision of SAE AS5316 - \"Storage of Elastomer Seals and Seal Assemblies Which Include an Elastomer Element Prior to Hardware Assembly\".","",0]
["1LM-EN-223","Printed Wire Board (PWB) Packaging - IPC-1602","Preservation, packaging, and packing of all deliverable goods shall be in accordance with the latest revision of IPC-1602- \"Standard for Printed Board Handling and Storage\".   ","",0]
["1LM-EN-301","PWB Moisture and Solderability Control Label","PWBs designated as a solderability controlled item shall be labeled with build history including the suffix note and a moisture sensitivity identification label.\nThe following build history and notes shall be included on label:\n1. Purchase Order number\n2. Part number and revision\n3. Lot number and date code\n4. Serial number\n5. Final finish date\n6. Date of solderability test and/or retest date\n7. \"Do not open until use Note: Retain packaging intact during storage.\"\n8. Type of bag used, either nitrogen purged or vacuum sealed \nThe suffix note on the label shall bold the actual bagging method used. \nThe label shall conform to the latest revision of JSTD-033.","MFC-PR-013","PWBs designated as a solderability controlled item shall be labeled with build history including the suffix note and a moisture sensitivity identification label.\n\nThe following build history and notes shall be included on label:\n1. Purchase Order number\n2. Part number and revision\n3. Lot number and date code\n4. Serial number\n5. Final finish date\n6. Date of solderability test and/or retest date\n7. “Do not open until use”\n\nNote: Retain packaging intact during storage.\n(Nitrogen purged or vacuum sealed) bag.\n\nThe suffix note on the label shall include in bold text the statement as shown above except include only the wording of the actual bagging method utilized in packaging.\n\nThe label shall conform to the latest revision of JSTD-033. "]
["1LM-EN-302","Raw Material Marking Requirements","Each piece of material, in addition to normal mil-spec requirements, must be marked with the following information:\n1. Lockheed Martin Part Number \n2. Purchase order number\n3. Heat lot number\n4. Material type \nThe marking material used must be of a type that is permanent under normal handling.\nThe marking must be located at the top corner of flat stock and on the end of bars or rods. \nIf this is not possible due to size restraint, each piece must be tagged with the required information. ","",0]
["1LM-EN-401 ","Electrostatic Discharge Protection Packaging","Devices delivered under this Contract are Electrostatic Sensitive. The Seller shall assure that devices delivered are packaged to provide electrostatic protection and identified as ESD in accordance with applicable specification.\r\nSeller shall package electronic hardware, which is sensitive to ESD, to protect sensitive items during shipment and storage. Seller shall cover external connectors on equipment containing ESD-sensitive hardware with conductive caps. The caps shall be black and have a maximum surface resistivity of 10E5 OHMS per square. Metal caps are also acceptable. Seller shall mark part number and serial number on the outside of each package.\r\nAdditional information on ESD can be found on the Electrostatic Discharge Association website located at http://www.esda.org. That website includes information on static control procedures and materials, how to eliminate and reduce generation, dissipate and neutralize charges, and protect sensitive products from ESD.","",0]
["1LM-EN-402","Electrostatic Discharge Protection Packaging - High Reliability","Electrostatic discharge sensitive (ESDS) articles shall be manufactured, tested, packaged, and shipped in an environment that assures protection of the device and meets ANSI ESD S20.20 or equivalent. Packaging material and containers shall be in accordance with ANSI ESD S541. The Seller shall clearly identify ESDS articles in accordance with ANSI ESD S20.20 to indicate that the package contains electrostatic sensitive goods. Static dissipative material or anti-static material shall not be used as static shielding (primary) packaging material.\nElectrical parts that may be used or shipped in conjunction with ESD sensitive parts shall be treated as ESD sensitive.\nNote: Polyethylene Plastic material such as Pink Poly material shall not be used as packaging material in direct contact with components or, for example as an insert in waffle packs or trays. This material is not adequate protection for ESD sensitive devices.\nNote: \"Pink Poly\" is a term commonly used to refer to polyethylene plastic treated with an antistatic agent. This PO note takes precedence over Buyer's Packaging Autoflow (1LM-SQ-012).","MFC-PK-002","Electrostatic discharge sensitive (ESDS) articles shall be manufactured, tested, packaged, and shipped in an environment that assures protection of the device and meets ANSI ESD S20.20 or equivalent. Packaging material and containers shall be in accordance with ANSI ESD S541 and clearly identify ESDS articles in accordance with ANSI ESD S20.20, or equivalent. Static dissipative material or anti-static material shall not be used as static shielding (primary) packaging material.\n\nNote: Polyethylene Plastic material such as Pink Poly material shall not be used as packaging material in direct contact with components or, for example, as an insert in waffle packs or trays. This material is not adequate protection for ESD sensitive devices.\n\nNote: “Pink Poly\" is a term commonly used to refer to polyethylene plastic treated with an antistatic agent. This PO note takes precedence over Buyer's Commercial Packaging note (MFC-PK-001)."]
["1LM-IN-001","Source Inspection Required","All articles are subject to buyer source inspection, which shall be conducted prior to the shipment of the article. The buyer reserves the right to perform or witness tests on all articles or a representative sample. If an article fails the source inspection, it may result in the rejection of the entire inspection order quantity. In the event of a failure, the seller is responsible for re-inspecting and/or reprocessing the inspection order to eliminate any failures. The seller is also required to submit a report to Lockheed Martin identifying all causes of the failure. \nTo schedule a source inspection, the supplier shall request via the Apriso Supplier Portal.\nDesired inspection date \nRequest 10 working days before planned inspection\nPurchase Order \nPurchase Order Line \nQuantity \n\nMaterial/content that should be made available to the source inspector at the time of source inspection (if applicable): \n\nMaterial to be inspected \nMost recent first article\nDrawings\nSpecifications\nProcedures\nStatement of Work\nCustomer's Purchase Order\nTest software\nMaterial certifications \nPrevious inspection evidence\nAcceptance test report(s)  \nOther material/content as agreed upon by both parties\n\nBuyer reserves the right to perform, add, or modify in-process inspection, in-process surveillance and/or audits at any time during the life of the PO. Such inspections, tests and mandatory inspection points (MIPs) can be identified during the PO review or acceptance process, and failure to comply with agreed upon MIPs with the Buyer's Supplier Quality shall be cause for rejection of completed end items.","MFC-SS-005","A Buyer Source Inspection is required on this product in addition to inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO).  A source inspection request must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer’s participation.  To submit your request for source inspection, you shall log into your Exostar account (http://portal.exostar.com) and access the LM P2P Portal.\n\nUpon logging in, click on the \"Ship to LMC\" tab, select the PO line item and click on the \"Request LMC Action\" button located at the bottom of the page. On the details & scheduling page that displays, enter the quantity to be inspected, the date desired for the visit of our source representative and press the \"Submit\" button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will be displayed.\n\nIf upon requesting source inspection the PO status changes from \"Source Inspection Required to \"Authorization to Ship - Qualified Vendor Program (QVP)\" or \"Authorized to Ship - Alternate Inspection Method (AIM)\", then these parts have been identified to skip source inspection and you may immediately process a ship to record and expedite material shipment.\n\nBuyer reserves the right to perform, add, or modify in-process inspection, in-process surveillance and/or audits at any time during the life of the PO.\n\nSuch inspections, tests and mandatory inspection points (MIPs) can be identified during the PO review or acceptance process, and failure to comply with agreed upon MIPs with the Buyer's Supplier Quality shall be cause for rejection of completed end items. \n\nWhen a completed source inspection checklist document is provided at the time of the source inspection activity, the document shall be included in the data package with each shipment of hardware.\n\nSource inspection does not relieve the seller of responsibility for Non-Conforming hardware found at a Buyer's facility.\n\nIf you require additional assistance, please contact the LM P2P Helpdesk at 863-647-0558 or your Buyer's Procurement Representative.\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to each shipment.\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance\nhttps://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos"]
["1LM-IN-002","Government Source Inspection","The hardware listed in this purchase order has mandatory government source inspection requirements. Upon receipt of this purchase order, the seller shall promptly notify the Government's Representative assigned to the supplier's facility. If a Government Representative does not normally service the supplier's facility or you cannot reach a Government Representative, the Seller should immediately notify the Lockheed Martin Buyer. \nThe Seller must inform the Government Representative's office according to the agreed-upon schedule with the Government Representative, when the items or materials are available for inspection or test. The seller shall make available to the Government Representative all applicable drawings, specifications, procedures, statements of work, purchase order, test software, and changes thereto, related inspection and/or test equipment, and any other information as may be required to satisfactorily perform the inspections and tests required under this order. \nGovernment inspections will be determined by the Government Representative and may be conducted during processing, fabrication, or final inspection. The specifics and scope of the inspections should be agreed upon by the Government Representative. The Seller shall not proceed with fabrication/manufacture processing until Government mandatory inspection points (GMIPs) are added to Organization's manufacturing planning. GMIPs shall not be by-passed unless authorized in writing by the Government inspection representative. \nThe seller will provide immediate notice to the Buyer of any Government-issued corrective action reports, notices or requests, as well as any Government-issued rejection notices.\nAt the time of shipment, the seller shall electronically submit objective evidence of completed Government Source Inspection to the Buyer. A data collection location will be available in the final inspection order within the Apriso Supplier Portal.","MFC-SS-003","Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) source inspection is required prior to shipment and evidence of the Government Source Inspection (GSI) shall accompany each shipment.\n\nSeller's manufacturing and/or related processes, products, associated inspection and/or test data are subject to review, verification, examination, test and/or analysis by authorized Government Representatives.\n\nUpon receipt of this order, Seller shall promptly notify their Government Representative so that appropriate planning for Government Source Inspection can be accomplished. If a Government Representative does not service your plant, contact the cognizant DCMA office for direction. In the event the Government Representative or office cannot be located, the Seller shall contact the Buyer immediately.\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment.\n\nSeller shall notify the Buyer of any requests for action issued by the Government (GCAR, audit findings, etc.)."]
["1LM-IN-003","In-Process Inspection","Material delivered against this purchase order requires oversight performed by a Buyer representative via in-process inspection. Seller shall partner with the Buyer under the guidelines of the in-process inspection scope.  Activities may include the following but is not limited to:\nLean Six Sigma/6S/FOD Control Assessment\nPre-cap inspection\nMandatory Inspection Points\nOther agreed upon inspections\nBuyer reserves the right to perform in-process inspection activities at Seller's facility and/or Seller's Sub-tiers as agreed upon by both parties. Buyer and Seller shall develop a schedule and activities that are mutually acceptable to both parties.  Schedule and activities may be subject to change depending on program requirements, personnel schedules, findings, supplier needs, etc. All changes will be coordinated in advance. ","MFC-IN-017","If an in-process inspection to determine workmanship is required at your facility, that requirement, including required notification of the Buyer, will be defined by an attachment to the purchase order"]
["1LM-IN-004","IN-PROCESS VISUAL WELD INSPECTION","Material delivered against this purchase order requires a visual weld inspection performed by a Buyer representative. This inspection shall occur prior to any coating. \nSeller shall notify the Buyer ten (10) working days in advance of each established visual weld inspection point. This shall occur via the Apriso Supplier Portal.\nBuyer reserves the right to perform in-process inspection activities at Seller's facility and/or Seller's Sub-tiers as agreed upon by both parties. Buyer and Seller shall develop a schedule and activities that are mutually acceptable to both parties.  Schedule and activities may be subject to change depending on program requirements, personnel schedules, findings, supplier needs, etc. All changes will be coordinated in advance. ","MFC-IN-015","Buyer visual weld inspection, prior to coating, is required on this product in addition to inspection requirements elsewhere in the Purchase Order.\n\nA request shall be submitted to the Buyer to arrange for a Supplier Quality in process weld inspection no less than ten (10) days prior to the desired inspection time."]
["1LM-IN-005","Precap Inspection","Material delivered against this purchase order requires a Pre-Cap inspection performed by a Buyer representative. A Pre-Cap inspection point shall be identified by the Seller prior to beginning work. A typical Pre-Cap inspection point occurs prior to permanently sealing an enclosed space. \nSeller shall notify the Buyer ten (10) working days in advance of each established Pre-Cap inspection point. This shall occur via the Apriso Supplier Portal.\nBuyer reserves the right to perform in-process inspection activities at Seller's facility and/or Seller's Sub-tiers as agreed upon by both parties. Buyer and Seller shall develop a schedule and activities that are mutually acceptable to both parties.  Schedule and activities may be subject to change depending on program requirements, personnel schedules, findings, supplier needs, etc. All changes will be coordinated in advance. ","MFC-IN-016","Units to be delivered under this contract require \"pre-cap\" inspection by Buyer at the Seller’s facility.\n\nA request shall be submitted to the Buyer to arrange for a supplier quality pre-cap inspection no less than ten (10) days prior to the desired inspection time. The Seller shall have available copies of his actual inspection/test results."]
["1LM-IN-006","Production Part Approval Process - PPAP","This product requires the Seller to submit a Level 4 PPAP meeting Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) manual requirements for the first validation of production line parts, in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO).\n\nAll resources defining the Seller's process in accordance with the PPAP, and all associated documentation submitted to the Seller, shall be in accordance with the latest version of the AIAG manuals. In-house documentation formats are acceptable when following the requirements of the latest version of the AIAG manual.\n\nThe Seller shall submit as minimum requirements unless otherwise specified by the Buyer:\nBallooned Drawing,\nDrawing dimensional characteristics and notes,\nMaterial and Performance test results, and\nPart Submission Warrant (PSW)\n\nThe Seller shall provide sample product, if specified by the Buyer. In the case of Seller acting as Distributor, Seller shall create a new PSW with the Distributor information per Purchase Order requirements. OEM's PSW approved by Distributor shall be submitted as part of PPAP package to Lockheed Martin (LM).\n\nAfter initial validation, if any changes to the process(es) are planned or have occurred, the Seller shall contact Lockheed Martin for PPAP re-submittal. Reference this PO note for more information.\n\nChanges must be communicated to LM in advance.  Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) PPAP as a contractual obligation, stated herein and in the 1LM-SQ-006 Supplier Process Change Control and Notification Requirements.\n\nThe Seller shall complete the Part Submission Warrant (PSW) and a copy of this document shall be provided with every shipment for each corresponding part number. If a non-conformance is found within the PPAP submission, Buyer may issue a deviation/waiver for the requirement If deviation/waiver is not feasible, inspection order/PPAP will be rejected and shipments are not allowed.  Seller is responsible to correct and re-submit the PPAP package, PPAP re-submission is required to obtain status of \"Approved\"\n\nThe Supplier shall submit a PPAP package including a Part Submission Warrant for approval prior to the first production shipment and when any of the following changes are planned or have occurred:\n1.     Use of other construction or material than was used in the previously approved part or product.\n2.     Production from new or modified tools (except perishable tools), dies, molds patterns, etc. including additional or replacement tooling.\n3.     Production following upgrade or movement of existing tooling or equipment.\n4.     Production from tooling and equipment transferred to or from a different plant site.\n5.     Change of supplier for parts, materials, or services (e.g., heat-treating, plating).\n6.     Product produced after the tooling has been inactive for volume production for 12 months or greater.\n7.     Product and process changes related to components of the production product manufactured internally or manufactured by sub-tier suppliers.\n8.     Change in test/inspection method - new technique (no effect on acceptance criteria).\n9.     Bulk material: new source of raw material from new or existing supplier and change in product appearance attributes.\n10.   Engineering change to design records, specifications, or materials for production product/part numbers.\n11.   Movement or change of process, movement of work to another site, part or material changes including those directed by Buyer.\n12.   Changes in the Make/buy of components or subassemblies.\n\nIf any part specifications cannot be met, the Seller shall document their problem-solving efforts and shall contact the authorized customer representative for concurrence in determination of appropriate corrective action.\n\nPPAP Submittal documentation shall be submitted electronically using Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment. The Seller is responsible for assuring objective evidence is retained for all information provided electronically. Material received by the Buyer without PPAP approval will be rejected and returned to the Seller at the Seller's expense.\n\nTo submit a request for PPAP, the Seller shall log into their Apriso Supplier Portal. Upon logging in, verify the status of the 'PO LI status' is 'PPAP Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request Inspection Order' button located at the bottom of the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page. On the pop-up window that displays, enter the 'Request Inspection Date' for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Request Inspection Order' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page.\n\nA request to conduct New or Partial PPAP must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.","MFC-IN-023","This product requires the Seller to submit a Level 4 PPAP meeting Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) manual requirements for the first validation of production line parts, in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO).\n\nAll resources defining the Seller's process in accordance with the PPAP, and all associated documentation submitted to the Seller, shall be in accordance with the latest version of the AIAG manuals. In-house documentation formats are acceptable when following the requirements of the latest version of the AIAG manual.\n\nThe Seller shall submit as minimum requirements unless otherwise specified by the Buyer:\no\tBallooned Drawing,\no\tDrawing dimensional characteristics and notes,\no\tMaterial and Performance test results, and\no\tPart Submission Warrant (PSW)\n\nThe Seller shall provide sample product, if specified by the Buyer. In the case of Seller acting as Distributor, Seller shall create a new PSW with the Distributor information per Purchase Order requirements. OEM's PSW approved by Distributor shall be submitted as part of PPAP package to Lockheed Martin (LM).\nAfter initial validation, if any changes to the process(es) are planned or have occurred, the Seller shall contact Lockheed Martin for PPAP re-submittal. Reference this PO note for more information.\n\nChanges must be communicated to LMMFC in advance.  Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) PPAP as a contractual obligation, stated herein and in the MFC-CC-001 Process Change Control requirement.\n\nThe Seller shall complete the Part Submission Warrant (PSW) and a copy of this document shall be provided with every shipment for each corresponding part number. If a non-conformance is found within the PPAP submission, Buyer may issue a deviation/waiver for the requirement If deviation/waiver is not feasible, inspection lot/PPAP will be rejected and shipments are not allowed.  Seller is responsible to correct and re-submit the PPAP package, PPAP re-submission is required to obtain status of \"Approved\"\n\nThe Supplier shall submit a PPAP package including a Part Submission Warrant for approval prior to the first production shipment and when any of the following changes are planned or have occurred:\n1.     Use of other construction or material than was used in the previously approved part or product.\n2.     Production from new or modified tools (except perishable tools), dies, molds patterns, etc. including additional or replacement tooling.\n3.     Production following upgrade or movement of existing tooling or equipment.\n4.     Production from tooling and equipment transferred to or from a different plant site.\n5.     Change of supplier for parts, materials, or services (e.g., heat-treating, plating).\n6.     Product produced after the tooling has been inactive for volume production for 12 months or greater.\n7.     Product and process changes related to components of the production product manufactured internally or manufactured by sub-tier suppliers.\n8.     Change in test/inspection method - new technique (no effect on acceptance criteria).\n9.     Bulk material: new source of raw material from new or existing supplier and change in product appearance attributes.\n10.  Engineering change to design records, specifications, or materials for production product/part numbers.\n11.   Movement or change of process, movement of work to another site, part or material changes including those directed by Buyer.\n12.   Changes in the Make/buy of components or subassemblies.\n\nIf any part specifications cannot be met, the Seller shall document their problem-solving efforts and shall contact the authorized customer representative for concurrence in determination of appropriate corrective action.\n\nPPAP Submittal documentation shall be submitted electronically using ship to module via Exostar prior to shipment.  You must log into your Exostar account at: http://portal.exostar.com The Seller is responsible for assuring objective evidence is retained for all information provided electronically. Material received by the Buyer without PPAP approval will be rejected and returned to the Seller at the Seller's expense.\n\nTo submit a request for PPAP, the Seller shall log into their Exostar account and access the LM P2P portal. Upon logging in, click on the 'Ship-To LMC' tab. For the specific PO and Line Item, verify the status of the 'Overall PO/Line Quality Status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request LMC Action' button located at the bottom of the 'Ship-To LMC' page. On the Detail & Scheduling' page that displays, enter the desired date for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Submit' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'Ship-To LMC' tab.\n\nA request to conduct New or Partial PPAP must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\n\nFor further instruction, please refer to: https://myexostar.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/LMP2P-Quality-Ship-To.pdf\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance\nhttps://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos"]
["1LM-IN-021","First Piece 100% Inspection - Report","Seller shall perform 100% detailed/dimensional inspection on the first completed item, record the actual dimensional data for all drawing characteristics, and compliance with drawing notes for all parts. The recorded data, related material, and process certs (as applicable) shall be delivered with the parts for each lot shipped.","MFC-IN-013","A detailed inspection report containing a recording of the actual readings on 100% of all characteristics and notes of the drawing is to be submitted with the first production lot, along with the individually tagged and identified first piece.\n\nAll data and documentation shall be submitted electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment."]
["1LM-IN-022","All Units - 100% Inspection - Report","Seller shall perform 100% detailed/dimensional inspection for all items, record the actual dimensional data for all drawing characteristics, and compliance with drawing notes for all parts. The recorded data, related material, and process certs (as applicable) shall be delivered with the parts for each lot shipped.","MFC-IN-014","Seller shall subject all parts in this order to 100% inspection of all characteristics (no sampling allowed) in addition to any other inspection requirements noted elsewhere in this Purchase Order.  At the Buyer's option, inspection may be witnessed by a representative of the Buyer at the Seller's facility prior to any material shipment.\n\nInspection data documentation showing required and actual inspection results shall be submitted electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment."]
["1LM-IN-101","First Article Requirement – Standard","A Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. \nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes, and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification, and Compatibility Evaluation\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twenty four (24) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition, all design or process changes shall require a full or partial delta (FAI).\nChanges must be communicated to Buyer in advance. Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) FAI as a contractual obligation, stated herein.\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Apriso Supplier Portal. Upon logging in, verify the status of the 'PO LI status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request Inspection Order' button located at the bottom of the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page. On the pop-up window that displays, enter the 'Request Inspection Date' for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Request Inspection Order' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page.\n\nFor any questions, contact the Buyer.\n\nDocumentation:\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp/electronic signature and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n     For subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO line item with no exception.\n     Note: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI.\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n6.a Seller Design Authority: For sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n6.b Catalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf: If the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.","MFC-IN-004","A Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. The Buyer's customer shall have the right to inspect all work included in PO at the Seller's facility.\n\nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\n\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation\n\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twenty four (24) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition:\n\na)  all design or process changes shall require a full or partial delta (FAI).\n\nChanges must be communicated to LMMFC in advance.  Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) First Article Inspections (FAI) as a contractual obligation, stated herein and in the MFC-CC-001 Process Change Control requirement.\n\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility. For any questions, contact the Buyer's Procurement Representative or the LM P2P Helpdesk at 863-647-0558.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Exostar account and access the LM P2P portal. Upon logging in, click on the 'Ship-To LMC' tab. For the specific PO and Line Item, verify the status of the 'Overall PO/Line Quality Status' is 'FAI Required'.\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request LMC Action' button located at the bottom of the 'Ship-To LMC' page. On the Detail & Scheduling' page that displays, enter the desired date for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Submit' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'Ship-To LMC' tab.\n\nFor further instruction, please refer to:\nhttps://myexostar.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/LMP2P-Quality-Ship-To.pdf\n\nNote: Overall PO/Line Quality Status within the Ship To Module will prompt \"FAI Required\" on the first shipment of each line item. For other FAI inquiries please contact the Buyer.\n\nDocumentation:\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n\nFor subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO with no exception.\nNote: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI. \n\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n\nSeller Design Authority:\nFor sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n\nCatalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf:\nIf the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance.\nhttps://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos\n\nRefer to the following link for the Missiles and Fire Control Supplier First Article Inspection Guidebook for guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/suppliers/mfc/mfc-quality-fai-guidebook.pdf"]
["1LM-IN-102","First Article Requirement - 12 Months","A Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. \nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes, and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification, and Compatibility Evaluation\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twelve (12) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition, all design or process changes shall require a full or partial delta (FAI).\nChanges must be communicated to Buyer in advance. Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) FAI as a contractual obligation, stated herein.\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Apriso Supplier Portal. Upon logging in, verify the status of the 'PO LI status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request Inspection Order' button located at the bottom of the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page. On the pop-up window that displays, enter the 'Request Inspection Date' for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Request Inspection Order' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page.\n\nFor any questions, contact the Buyer.\n\nDocumentation:\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp/electronic signature and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n     For subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO line item with no exception.\n    Note: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI.\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n6.a Seller Design Authority: For sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n6.b Catalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf: If the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.","MFC-IN-003","A Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. The Buyer's customer shall have the right to inspect all work included in PO at the Seller's facility.\n\nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\n\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation\n\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twelve (12) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition:\n\n    a)  all design or process changes shall require a full or partial delta (FAI).\n\nChanges must be communicated to LMMFC in advance.  Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) First Article Inspections (FAI) as a contractual obligation, stated herein and in the MFC-CC-001 Process Change Control requirement.\n\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility. For any questions, contact the Buyer's Procurement Representative or the LM P2P Helpdesk at 863-647-0558.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Exostar account and access the LM P2P portal. Upon logging in, click on the 'Ship-To LMC' tab. For the specific PO and Line Item, verify the status of the 'Overall PO/Line Quality Status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request LMC Action' button located at the bottom of the 'Ship-To LMC' page. On the Detail & Scheduling' page that displays, enter the desired date for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Submit' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'Ship-To LMC' tab.\n\nFor further instruction, please refer to:\nhttps://myexostar.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/LMP2P-Quality-Ship-To.pdf\n\nNote: Overall PO/Line Quality Status within the Ship To Module will prompt \"FAI Required\" on the first shipment of each line item. For other FAI inquiries please contact the Buyer.\n\nDocumentation:\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n\nFor subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO with no exception.\nNote: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI. \n\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n\nSeller Design Authority:\nFor sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n\nCatalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf:\nIf the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance. https://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos\n\nRefer to the following link for the Missiles and Fire Control Supplier First Article Inspection Guidebook for guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/suppliers/mfc/mfc-quality-fai-guidebook.pdf"]
["1LM-IN-104","First Article Inspection - 12 Months with Refresh","In order to revalidate that product realization processes are capable of producing parts and assemblies that meet engineering and design requirements, the Seller shall perform a new full FAI IAW AS9102 if a three (3) year lapse has occurred since the most recently approved full FAI.\nA Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. \nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twelve (12) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition, all design or process changes shall require a full or partial delta (FAI).\nChanges must be communicated to Buyer in advance. Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) FAI as a contractual obligation, stated herein.\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Apriso Supplier Portal. Upon logging in, verify the status of the 'PO LI status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request Inspection Order' button located at the bottom of the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page. On the pop-up window that displays, enter the 'Request Inspection Date' for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Request Inspection Order' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page.\n\nFor any questions, contact the Buyer. \n\nDocumentation:\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp/electronic signature and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n     For subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO line item with no exception.\n     Note: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI.\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n6.a Seller Design Authority: For sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n6.b Catalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf: If the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.","MFC-IN-021","In order to revalidate that product realization processes are capable of producing parts and assemblies that meet engineering and design requirements, the Seller shall perform a new full FAI IAW AS9102 if a three (3) year lapse has occurred since the most recently approved full FAI.\n\nA Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. The Buyer's customer shall have the right to inspect all work included in PO at the Seller's facility.\n\nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\n\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation\n\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twelve (12) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition:\n\n     a) all design or process changes shall require a full or  partial delta (FAI).\n\nChanges must be communicated to LMMFC in advance.  Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) First Article Inspections (FAI)as a contractual obligation, stated herein and in the MFC-CC-001 Process Change Control requirement.\n\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility. For any questions, contact the Buyer's Procurement Representative or the LM P2P Helpdesk at 863-647-0558.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Exostar account and access the LM P2P portal. Upon logging in, click on the 'Ship-To LMC' tab. For the specific PO and Line Item, verify the status of the 'Overall PO/Line Quality Status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request LMC Action' button located at the bottom of the 'Ship-To LMC' page. On the Detail & Scheduling' page that displays, enter the desired date for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Submit' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'Ship-To LMC' tab.\n\nFor further instruction, please refer to:\nhttps://myexostar.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/LMP2P-Quality-Ship-To.pdf\n\nNote: Overall PO/Line Quality Status within the Ship To Module will prompt \"FAI Required\" on the first shipment of each line item. For other FAI inquiries please contact the Buyer.\n\nDocumentation:\n\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n\nFor subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO with no exception.\n\nNote: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI. \n\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n\nSeller Design Authority:\n\nFor sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n\nCatalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf:\n\nIf the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance.\nhttps://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos\n\nRefer to the following link for the Missiles and Fire Control Supplier First Article Inspection Guidebook for guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/suppliers/mfc/mfc-quality-fai-guidebook.pdf"]
["1LM-IN-105","First Article Inspection - 24 Months with Refresh ","In order to revalidate that product realization processes are capable of producing parts and assemblies that meet engineering and design requirements, the Seller shall perform a new full FAI IAW AS9102 if a three (3) year lapse has occurred since the most recently approved full FAI.\nA Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. \nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twenty-four (24) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition, all design or process changes shall require a full or partial delta (FAI).\nChanges must be communicated to Buyer in advance. Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) FAI as a contractual obligation, stated herein.\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Apriso Supplier Portal. Upon logging in, verify the status of the 'PO LI status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request Inspection Order' button located at the bottom of the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page. On the pop-up window that displays, enter the 'Request Inspection Date' for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Request Inspection Order' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page.\n\nFor any questions, contact the Buyer.\n\nDocumentation:\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp/electronic signature and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n     For subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO line item with no exception.\n     Note: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI.\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n6.a Seller Design Authority: For sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n6.b Catalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf: If the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.","MFC-IN-022","In order to revalidate that product realization processes are capable of producing parts and assemblies that meet engineering and design requirements, the Seller shall perform a new full FAI IAW AS9102 if a three (3) year lapse has occurred since the most recently approved full FAI.\n\nA Buyer First Article Inspection (FAI) is required on this product in addition to any other inspection requirements elsewhere in this Purchase Order (PO). The FAI shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Representative prior to the shipment of the material. The Buyer's customer shall have the right to inspect all work included in PO at the Seller's facility.\n\nA request to conduct New or Partial/Delta First Article Inspection must be received at least (10) working days in advance of the planned inspection to allow for Buyer's participation if required.\n\nFAI shall be performed by the Seller in accordance with the latest revision of Aerospace Standard AS9102.  Seller shall utilize the current AS9102 forms, or equivalent, including:\n\n     Form 1 - Part Number Accountability\n     Form 2 - Product Accountability - Materials, Special Processes and Functional Testing\n     Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility Evaluation\n\nSeller shall be required to perform a new FAI when there is a lapse in production exceeding twelve (12) months. Any changes or deviations as defined in AS9102 shall require a full or partial (delta) FAI. In addition:\n\n     a) all design or process changes shall require a full or  partial delta (FAI).\n\nChanges must be communicated to LMMFC in advance.  Actions associated with changes shall require a new Full (complete) or Partial (addressing changes) First Article Inspections (FAI)as a contractual obligation, stated herein and in the MFC-CC-001 Process Change Control requirement.\n\nFAI does not relieve the Seller of responsibility of nonconforming hardware found at the Buyer's facility. For any questions, contact the Buyer's Procurement Representative or the LM P2P Helpdesk at 863-647-0558.\n\nTo submit a request for FAI, the Seller shall log into their Exostar account and access the LM P2P portal. Upon logging in, click on the 'Ship-To LMC' tab. For the specific PO and Line Item, verify the status of the 'Overall PO/Line Quality Status' is 'FAI Required':\n\nSelect the PO line item and click on the 'Request LMC Action' button located at the bottom of the 'Ship-To LMC' page. On the Detail & Scheduling' page that displays, enter the desired date for the visit of the Buyer's Quality Representative and press the 'Submit' button. Upon submission, the inspection lot number will display within the 'Ship-To LMC' tab.\n\nFor further instruction, please refer to:\nhttps://myexostar.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/LMP2P-Quality-Ship-To.pdf\n\nNote: Overall PO/Line Quality Status within the Ship To Module will prompt \"FAI Required\" on the first shipment of each line item. For other FAI inquiries please contact the Buyer.\n\nDocumentation:\n\n1. Buyer's Quality Representative shall review the AS9102, Form 1 (Part Number Accountability) or equivalent for completeness, verify legibility; print name, sign/stamp and date appropriate blocks as evidence of Buyer's acceptance.\n\n2. For the initial shipments requiring a new or partial (delta) FAI, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's approved AS9102 with the hardware delivery.\n\nFor subsequent shipments, the Seller shall upload an electronic copy of the Buyer's previously approved AS9102, Form 1 with each hardware delivery no sooner than 120 days prior to the PO delivery date for each line item.\n\n3. FAI is required for all the part/assembly number(s) included on this PO with no exception.\n\nNote: When a drawing for an assembly includes a parts list and/or sub-assembly drawings, all revision levels shall be included and validated on the AS9102, Form 1.\n\n4. Certificate of Conformances (CoC) for special processes included in the FAI package must include a complete list of associated specification requirements and results. CoCs attesting solely to conformity without detail and rationale will result in a rejection of the Seller’s FAI. \n\n5. FAI is required for sub-assemblies and detail parts that make up the configuration item(s) included on this PO, with the following exceptions:\n\nSeller Design Authority:\n\nFor sub-assemblies and/or detail parts where the Seller has design authority, FAI requirements shall be defined in the Statement of Requirements (SOR).\n\nCatalog and Commercial Off-the-Shelf:\n\nIf the part number, as listed on this PO, is for a Buyer or Seller designed product that has a standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf hardware, as defined by AS9102, included at sub-assembly levels, then FAI is not required for the standard catalog or commercial off-the-shelf parts/assemblies.\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance.\nhttps://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos\n\nRefer to the following link for the Missiles and Fire Control Supplier First Article Inspection Guidebook for guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/suppliers/mfc/mfc-quality-fai-guidebook.pdf"]
["1LM-IN-201","Purchase Order Review","The Seller is required to perform a PO Requirements Review with the Buyer for this Purchase Order. Upon acceptance of the PO, Apriso Supplier Portal will generate a single PO review inspection order for the entire PO and will display within the 'View Purchase Orders (PO & LI)' page. The PO review inspection order shall be completed prior to commencing performance under this PO.\n \nUpon Seller request, the Buyer will coordinate a meeting to review the engineering drawings, PO requirements, inspection criteria, special processes, defect history, etc. This review may be conducted virtually or at the Seller's facility, as determined by the Buyer.\n\nPlease note, in-process or final inspections cannot be requested until PO Review is complete. Lockheed Martin's approval of supplier's readiness does not release the supplier from the responsibility of meeting all PO requirements.\n\nPurchase Order Analysis & Compliance Validation form # MFC-0732, shall be completed and uploaded to Apriso “PO Review Inspection” prior to the review by the Buyer. Seller shall be responsible for populating all PO review form items which are identified for their responsibility. (Note: Seller is not responsible for items identified as LM items).","MFC-SS-004","A Buyer’s Purchase Order (PO) review is required on this product in addition to inspection requirements elsewhere in this purchase order. The Seller shall request Purchase Order Review upon receipt of the PO or prior to commencing performance under this PO. The objective of the PO review is to ensure the seller understands all PO requirements. This review may be conducted by phone or at the Seller’s facility as determined by the Buyer.\n\nTo submit your request for PO review, you must log into your Exostar account (http://portal.exostar.com) and access the LM P2P Portal.\n\nUpon logging in, click on the “Ship to LMC” tab, select the PO line item and click on the “Request LMC Action” button located at the bottom of the page. On the details and scheduling page that displays, enter the date desired for the visit of our source representative and press the “submit” button. Upon submission, an inspection lot number will be displayed.\n\nPurchase Order Analysis & Compliance Validation form # MFC-0732, shall be completed and uploaded to P2P’s “PO Review lot” prior to the review by the Buyer. Seller shall be responsible for populating all PO review form items which are identified for their responsibility. (Note: Seller is not responsible for items identified as LM items). This form is available on the Buyer’s web server location below   \nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html under External forms.\n\nIf you require additional assistance, please contact the LM P2P Helpdesk at 863-647-0558 or your Buyer’s Procurement Representative.\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance https://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos\n\nRefer to the following link for the Missiles and Fire Control Supplier Purchase Order Review Guidebook for guidance.\nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/suppliers/mfc/mfc-quality-por-guidebook.pdf"]
["1LM-IN-202","Seller Inspection Plan Approval","Seller shall submit a final inspection plan to the Buyer for Buyer's Quality Engineering approval for the items to be manufactured. Any changes to the plan shall be approved by the Buyer's Quality Engineering prior to implementation. Inspection plan approval date must be agreed upon with the Buyer's Quality Engineering representative prior to beginning work. ","MFC-IN-019","Seller shall submit a final inspection plan to the Buyer’s Procurement Representative for Buyer’s Quality Engineering approval for the items to be manufactured under this contract. Any changes to the plan shall be approved by the Buyer’s Quality Engineering prior to implementation."]
["1LM-IN-203","PRODUCTION LINE VALIDATION","Seller shall host a production line validation (PLV) review at their manufacturing facility in conjunction with the production and acceptance of the first delivered production lot.\nThe PLV shall consist of a physical demonstration of the \"critical\" operations as determined by the Buyer on the Seller's production line. Seller shall demonstrate the use of production documentation and tooling in the fabrication of each configuration item.\nSeller shall provide appropriate subject matter experts (SME) to coordinate and provide escort for the demonstration.  Seller's SME shall be capable and responsible for answering technical questions for a multifunctional team consisting of Buyer’s representatives and government representatives who will witness the demonstration.  The Seller shall plan and schedule the PLV so as to meet all contractual delivery dates.\nSeller shall provide a minimum of ten (10) business days advance notice of PLV commencement.  Seller shall submit a plan, in the Seller's format and a process flow for approval before commencing the PLV.\nSeller shall address all PLV corrective and preventive action items generated from the PLV in a timely manner for utilization in future production fabrications. All responses to PLV action items shall be presented to the Buyer for acceptance.\nAfter the initial PLV acceptance, Seller shall notify the Buyer of significant production process and or tooling/equipment changes and submit a plan and schedule to conduct a delta or repeat PLV regarding the portions of the production process changed; prior to resumption of product deliveries.\nSignificant changes include:\n* A change in the design affecting form, fit, or functions of the part.\n* A significant change in manufacturing source(s), processes,  inspection method(s), location, tooling, machine or materials with the potential of affecting fit, form or function.\n* A lapse in production of one (1) year or more.\nPLV May be waived by the Buyer and must be in writing.\nIf PLV is waived, the following will be invoked:\n1. Manufacturing and related processes, your products and associated inspection and/or test data/equipment are subject to review, verification, examination, test and/or analysis by authorized government or Buyer’s representatives.\n2. Prior to use of the subject methodology, the Seller shall notify Buyer in writing each parameter to be inspected/tested with the equipment make, model number, and calibrated accuracy of equipment.","MFC-IN-002","Seller shall host a production line validation (PLV) review at their manufacturing facility in conjunction with the production and acceptance of the first delivered production lot.\n\nThe PLV shall consist of a physical demonstration of the \"critical\" operations as determined by the Buyer on the Seller's production line. Seller shall demonstrate the use of production documentation and tooling in the fabrication of each configuration item.\n\nSeller shall provide appropriate subject matter experts (SME) to coordinate and provide escort for the demonstration.  Seller's SME shall be capable and responsible for answering technical questions for a multifunctional team consisting of Buyer’s representatives and/or government representatives who will witness the demonstration.  The Seller shall plan and schedule the PLV so as to meet all contractual delivery dates.\n\nSeller shall provide a minimum of ten (10) business days advance notice of PLV commencement.  Seller shall submit a plan, in the Seller's format and a process flow for approval before commencing the PLV.\n\nSeller shall address all PLV corrective and preventive action items generated from the PLV in a timely manner for utilization in future production fabrications. All responses to PLV action items shall be presented to the Buyer for acceptance.\n\nAfter the initial PLV acceptance, Seller shall notify the Buyer of significant production process and or tooling/equipment changes and submit a plan and schedule to conduct a delta or repeat PLV regarding the portions of the production process changed; prior to resumption of product deliveries.\n\nSignificant changes include:\n* A change in the design affecting form, fit, or functions of the part.\n* A significant change in manufacturing source(s), processes,  inspection method(s), location, tooling, machine or materials with the potential of affecting fit, form or function.\n* A lapse in production of one (1) year or more.\n\nPLV May be waived by the Buyer and must be in writing.\n\nIf PLV is waived, the following will be invoked:\n1. Manufacturing and related processes, your products and associated inspection and/or test data/equipment are subject to review, verification, examination, test and/or analysis by authorized government or Buyer’s representatives.\n2. Prior to use of the subject methodology, the Seller shall notify Buyer in writing each parameter to be inspected/tested with the equipment make, model number, and calibrated accuracy of equipment."]
["1LM-IN-204","Inspection Data Deliverable","Seller inspection data and/or test reports are required. Dimensional inspection data for all critical/major characteristics and indication of acceptance for minor characteristics shall be included in an inspection report on items delivered under this purchase order.  This report shall reference part number, revision level, serial numbers (as applicable), and purchase order number. \nMinimum level of inspection shall be:  100% for critical characteristics, 1.0 AQL level II, ASQ Z1.4 for majors, and 2.5 AQL level II, ASQ Z1.4 for minors (all other than critical or major). \nWhen required on the drawing, an inspection report with a Certificate of Conformance for magnetic particle inspection, radiograph inspection (including film for each casting), fluorescent penetrant inspection, ultrasonic inspection, pressure test, and grain flow results shall be submitted.\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment. ","",0]
["1LM-IN-205","Chemical Agent Resistance Coating PROCESS REVIEW","The Seller shall review their planned paint process with the cognizant Buyer's Supplier Quality Engineer (SQE). This review is required before proceeding to paint. Once the process has been reviewed, the SQE will notify the buyer of the completed review. The buyer will then document the completed review date in the PO header text. Once the process and source of supply has been agreed upon, any subsequent changes will require LM approval.","",0]
["1LM-IN-206","Production Process Baseline Assessment (PPB) Review","Buyer reserves the right to perform an onsite assessment of the Seller's business systems, quality systems, and production lines that support this procurement. This assessment will be a 2-3 day event performed by the Buyer’s cross-functional team (approximately 4 people) which may include U.S. Government participation (approximately 2 people). Seller shall support one (1) Production Process Baseline (PPB) Assessment Review.\r\nReview per production contract, at a time agreed upon between the Buyer and Seller. This review shall occur in conjunction with the production of hardware for the current production contract so that actual and relevant processes may be witnessed as a basis for the assessment. Buyer will notify the Seller of the processes desired to be witnessed so that the Seller can recommend possible event schedules.\r\nNote: PPB may be referred to using unique programmatic terminology (i.e. CVP, PPVR, QFSA, SMPS, etc).","MFC-IN-012","Buyer reserves the right to perform an onsite assessment of the Seller's business systems, quality systems, and production lines that support this procurement. This assessment will be a 2-3 day event performed by the Buyer’s cross-functional team (approximately 4 people) which may include U.S. Government participation (approximately 2 people). Seller shall support one (1) Production Process Baseline (PPB) Assessment Review.\n\nReview per production contract, at a time agreed upon between the Buyer and Seller. This review shall occur in conjunction with the production of hardware for the current production contract so that actual and relevant processes may be witnessed as a basis for the assessment. Buyer will notify the Seller of the processes desired to be witnessed so that the Seller can recommend possible event schedules.\n\nNote: PPB may be referred to using unique programmatic terminology (i.e. CVP, PPVR, QFSA, SMPS, etc)."]
["1LM-PG-001","Data AMMO Cards - MIL-STD-1168","REF: MIL-STD-1168, Seller is to utilize the default Ammo Data Card (ADC) electronic database, a Worldwide Ammunition-Data Repository Program (WARP), currently located in the Munitions History Program (MHP) at (https://mhpwarp.redstone.army.mil).\r\nIf authorized by each Program through the Buyer, the following can be utilized instead of the WARP Database. Ammo Data Cards (DD Form 1650) shall accompany each ordnance article and comply with MIL-STD-1168. DI-MISC-80043 may be used to assist in filling out the form. Current Revisions of DD Form 1650 can be found at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/forms/dd/dd1650.pdf If no Government Source is called out on the Purchase Order, the Seller's Quality Representative, or the Buyer's Source Inspector shall complete blocks 20 through 22 and sign block 23 of the Ammunition Data Card. Ordnance articles shall be packaged and identified in accordance with applicable specification and safety requirements.","MFC-PR-006","REF: MIL-STD-1168, Supplier is to utilize the default Ammo Data Card (ADC) electronic database, a Worldwide Ammunition-Data Repository Program (WARP), currently located in the Munitions History Program (MHP) at(https://mhpwarp.redstone.army.mil).\n\nIf authorized by each Program through the Buyer, the following can be utilized instead of the WARP Database. Ammo Data Cards (DD Form 1650) shall accompany each ordnance article and comply with MIL-STD-1168. DI-MISC-80043 may be used to assist in filling out the form. If no Government Source is called out on the Purchase Order, the Seller’s Quality Representative, or the Buyer’s Source Inspector shall complete blocks 20 through 22 and sign block 23 of the Ammunition Data Card. Ordnance articles shall be packaged and identified in accordance with applicable specification and safety requirements."]
["1LM-PG-002","Additive Manufacturing Notification","The Seller shall notify the Lockheed Martin Buyer when additive manufacturing as defined in ISO/ASTM 52900 will be used to manufacture the product or any part of the product being supplied to this purchase order.  Notification is not required when the Lockheed Martin design drawing specifies additive manufacturing as the production method. This requirement does not apply to COTS material (COTS - as defined in FAR 2.101).","",0]
["1LM-PG-004","Specialized Equipment Configuration Control ","The seller shall be subject to configuration control for all specialized equipment designs required to perform inspection and testing activities, including the software and hardware used in testing of contracted articles. Specialized equipment includes Special Inspection Equipment (SIE), Special Test Equipment (STE) and Acceptance Test Equipment (ATE).","",""]
["1LM-PG-101","Lockheed Banned or Restricted Materials","The Seller shall ensure that no Priority Chemicals are contained in the material being delivered against this Purchase Order.\nThe current list of Lockheed Martin Priority Chemicals can be found at: \nhttps://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/aero/documents/scm/tandc/ES-H/Lockheed_Martin_Priority_Chemicals_List.pdf\nIf any hazardous materials will be contained in the product, the Buyer must be notified when the Seller becomes aware of the presence of Priority Chemicals. Lockheed Martin reserves approval authority for use of restricted materials. ","",0]
["1LM-PG-102","RoHS Compliance","Seller shall ensure that all materials and products provided under this purchase order comply with the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) directive 2011/65/EU and its amendments. Seller shall provide a RoHS compliance certificate with each delivery, indicating that the materials and products meet the maximum concentration values for the restricted substances. Seller is responsible for verifying that all components and materials used in the production of the products comply with the RoHS directive. ","",0]
["1LM-PG-103","CE Compliance","Seller shall ensure that material delivered on this Purchase Order are CE (Conformité Européenne) Compliant. The seller shall ensure that the product is CE marked and certified to the applicable CE directives. ","",0]
["1LM-PG-104","Standard Mercury Exclusion","Material supplied shall contain no functional mercury and shall not be contaminated by mercury or mercury compounds. Seller shall obtain approval from the Buyer before shipment if: (a) functional mercury is present; (b) mercury contamination is suspected, or (c) mercury is knowingly introduced in the manufacturing process.  RoHS compliant parts are considered compliant to this requirement.","",0]
["1LM-PG-105","Mercury Exclusion Certification","1)  The material supplied under this purchase order shall contain no metallic mercury and shall be free from mercury contamination. Mercury contamination of the material will be cause for rejection.\n2)  If the inclusion of metallic mercury is required as a functional part of the material furnished under this purchase order, the Seller shall obtain written approval from the Buyer before proceeding with manufacture or delivery of the parts.  The Seller's request shall explain in detail the requirements for mercury, identify specifically the parts to contain mercury, and explain the method of protection or containment against mercury escape.\n3)  If external contamination during manufacture, storage, or transport of the material is suspected, then the following test may be utilized to determine whether contamination exists:\n1. Enclose the part or equipment in a polyethylene bag or close fitting air tight container for eight hours at room temperature (70 deg minimum).\n2. Sample trapped air and if mercury vapor concentration is .01mg/cu meter or more, the material is considered contaminated insofar as to requirements to this purchase order are concerned.\n4)  These requirements shall be included in any sub-tier purchase order or contract hereunder and the Seller shall ensure compliance by sub-tier suppliers.\n5)  Technical questions pertaining to these requirements shall be referred to the Buyer shown on the Purchase Order who will coordinate responses to any questions.\n6)  The Seller shall provide written confirmation that includes the following information on company letterhead signed by an appropriate authorized agent.\n     - PO Number and Line item number\n     - Part number\n     - Qty\n     - Serial number, Date code, and/or Lot number (if applicable)\n\nAt a minimum the written confirmation will state that:\n a)The delivered material does not contain metallic mercury or mercury contamination\nOR:\n b) The material contains functional mercury, the specific parts affected, and that written approval from Lockheed authorizing shipment of the affected parts is attached.","",0]
["1LM-PG-106","REACH Compliance","Seller shall ensure that material delivered on this Purchase Order are REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals) Compliant. ","",0]
["1LM-PG-110","Hazardous Material Labels","Seller shall ensure that each container of toxic substances or hazardous chemicals shall bear a label with the chemical name and hazard warning as defined by O.S.H.A. Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200 and state employee Right-to-Know laws.\nIn addition, Seller shall provide material safety data sheets (MSDS) for these substances with each shipment. ","MFC-PK-010","Seller shall ensure that each container of toxic substances or hazardous chemical shall bear a label with the chemical name and hazard warning as defined by O.S.H.A. Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910, 1200 and state employee “Right to Know” laws. \n\nIn addition, Seller shall provide material safety data sheets (MSDS) for these substances with each shipment."]
["1LM-PG-111","Ship with MSDS/SDS","Seller shall electronically upload the material's MSDS/SDS via the Apriso Supplier Portal. If the Material Safety Data Sheet does not have a number then document the Hazard Code. ","",0]
["1LM-SQ-001","Quality, Safety, and Ethics Awareness","Seller shall establish a communication method that ensures all personnel are aware of their contribution to product safety and product or service conformity. This method shall establish a frequency of communication that is appropriate to the organization and this communication will occur annually at a minimum. Seller shall maintain records of this communication.\r\nSupplier ethics should align with the Lockheed Martin Supplier Code of Conduct that can be found linked on the Supplier Ethics page (https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/supplier-ethics.html)","MFC-AS-001\nMFC-AS-002","Seller shall establish a communication method that ensures all personnel are aware of their contribution to product safety. This method shall establish a frequency of communication that is appropriate to the organization and this communication will occur annually at a minimum. Seller shall maintain records of this communication.\n\nSeller shall establish a communication method that ensures all personnel are aware of their contribution to Product or Service Conformity. This method shall establish a frequency of communication that is appropriate to the organization and will occur annually at a minimum. Seller shall maintain records of this communication. "]
["1LM-SQ-002","Sub-tier Requirements Flowdown","When products or services applicable to this PO are procured by the seller from Sub-tier suppliers, the seller shall flow the quality PO requirements and all other requirements, as necessary, to assure full compliance is achieved.","MFC-CC-003","The Seller shall have systems and methods to assure full compliance to all quality Purchase Order (PO) notes and requirements applicable to this PO. When products or services applicable to this PO are procured by the seller from sub-tier suppliers, the seller shall flow the quality PO note requirements and all other requirements, as necessary, to assure full compliance is achieved."]
["1LM-SQ-003","Documentation Language","The Seller shall have the capability to communicate verbally and in writing in the English language. All documents requiring submission or approval to the customer (e.g. reports, correspondence, drawings, notices, marking, documents, records, and other communications) shall be in the English language unless otherwise specified on PO. \n\nThe Seller shall communicate the language requirements (English) to external providers. ","MFC-DC-024","The Seller shall have the capability to communicate verbally and in writing in the English language. All documents requiring submission or approval to the customer (reports, correspondence, drawings, notices, marking, and other communications) shall be in the English language.\n\nMinimum documents that shall be in English include, but are not limited to:\nI.   QMS Manual\nII.  First level QMS procedures\nIII. Process documentation (including FAI documentation) as required\n\nThe Seller shall communicate the language requirements (English) to external providers for their interactions with the organization.\n\nSeller documents and records submitted to Buyer shall be in English unless otherwise specified on PO."]
["1LM-SQ-004","Counterfeit Avoidance","This entire note, or requirements that meet the intent of this note, shall be flowed down to all Sub-tier suppliers under this contract and the Seller shall provide evidence of compliance to this note upon request. \n\nSourcing: \n1. Seller shall only purchase products to be delivered or incorporated as work to the Buyer directly from:\nOriginal Component Manufacturer (OCM) \nOriginal Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) \nThrough an OCM/OEM authorized suppliers (distributor) \nOr from suppliers that obtain such parts exclusively from the original manufacturer of the parts or their authorized dealers with no intermediaries. \n\nSeller may use another source only if: \n1. The foregoing sources are unavailable\n2. Seller's inspection and other counterfeit risk mitigation processes will be employed to ensure the authenticity of the work. As a minimum, testing shall be in accordance with AS6171 Moderate Risk Model 2.\n3. The suppliers meet applicable DOD-adopted counterfeit prevention industry standards (as shown in the DoD ASSIST data base and processes (including tests).\n4. Independent distributors or brokers are not acceptable suppliers and shall not be used to provide product delivered under this PO unless approved in advance, in writing, by the Buyer.\n\nApproval to use another source other than defined above requires the submittal of a comprehensive risk mitigation test and inspection plan to the Buyer. The risk mitigation plan shall define appropriate tests and inspections, as well as acceptance criteria, to validate the products authenticity.\nTest results shall be reviewed and approved by the Buyer's Quality Engineering prior to shipping or incorporating into deliverable hardware.\n\nCounterfeit Prevention Processes: \n1. The Seller shall have counterfeit parts prevention processes that supplement those required by SAE QMS standards AS9100, AS9120, AS9110 or ISO9001. \n2. Seller shall develop and implement a counterfeit product control plan using industry recognized standards applicable to the product being delivered as guidance. The plan shall be available for the Buyer review upon request. Examples of industry and DoD recognized SAE standards are AS5553, AS6081, AS6174, and AS6171\n3. The Seller's counterfeit avoidance and detection systems are subject to Buyer and/or Buyer's customer audit and approval.\n\nTraceability: \n1. Seller shall implement systems that assure traceability of all material from the original manufacturer to product acceptance by the Buyer. \n2. Seller shall have processes that enable tracking from the OCM, OEM or the OCM/OEM authorized suppliers, whether the part is supplied as a discrete part or is contained in an assembly. \n3. This requirement applies to all work delivered to the Buyer either directly or indirectly as components or included in assemblies. ","MFC-PR-003","Sourcing:\nSeller shall only purchase products to be delivered or incorporated as work to the Buyer directly from\nI.   Original Component Manufacturer (OCM)\nII.  Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)\nIII. Through an OCM/OEM authorized suppliers (distributor)\nIV.  Or from suppliers that obtain such parts exclusively from the original manufacturer of the parts or their authorized dealers with no intermediaries.\n\nSeller may use another source only if:\nI.    The foregoing sources are unavailable\nII.  Seller's inspection and other counterfeit risk mitigation processes will be employed to ensure the authenticity of the work. As a minimum, testing shall be in accordance with AS6171 Moderate Risk Model 2.\nIII. The suppliers meet applicable DOD-adopted counterfeit prevention industry standards and processes (including tests).\nIV. Independent distributors or brokers are not acceptable suppliers and shall not be used to provide product delivered under this PO unless approved in advance, in writing, by Buyer.\n\nApproval to use another source other than defined above requires the submittal of a comprehensive risk mitigation test and inspection plan to the Buyer. The risk mitigation plan shall define appropriate tests and inspections, as well as acceptance criteria, to validate the products authenticity.\n\nTest results shall be reviewed and approved by the Buyer's Quality Engineering prior to shipping or incorporating into deliverable hardware.\n\nCounterfeit Prevention Processes:\na. \t Seller shall develop and implement a counterfeit product control plan using industry recognized standards applicable to the product being delivered as guidance. The plan shall be available for the Buyer review upon request. Examples of  industry and DoD recognized SAE standards are AS5553, AS6081 and AS6174.\nb. \t The Seller's counterfeit avoidance and detection systems are subject to Buyer and/or Buyer's customer audit and approval.\n\nTraceability:\na. \t Seller shall implement systems that assure traceability of all material from the original manufacturer to product acceptance by the Buyer.\nb. \t For electronic parts, Seller shall have processes that enable tracking from the OCM, OEM or the OCM/OEM authorized suppliers, whether the electronic part is supplied as a discrete electronic part or is contained in an assembly.\nc. \t This requirement applies to all work delivered to the Buyer either directly or indirectly as components or included in assemblies.\nd. \t This entire note, or requirements that meet the intent of this note, shall be flowed down to all Sub-tier suppliers under this contract and the Seller shall provide evidence of compliance to this note upon request."]
["1LM-SQ-005","Electronic Data Submission and Barcode","1. The Seller shall submit all data electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment when documentation requirements are specified in the purchase order and include the manufacturer's cage code, any applicable traceability data (Heat Lot, Date Code, Lot Number, etc.) and upload any applicable documentation. The Seller shall create an Advanced Shipping Notice (ASN) in Ariba.\n2. Paper copies of traceability data are not required with the shipment of material when the data has been provided electronically and/or documentation has been uploaded in the shipping document. The Seller is responsible for assuring objective evidence is retained for all information provided electronically. Material received at the Buyer without electronic data/documentation may be subject to rejection and return at the Seller's expense. \n3. Additional data deliverable requirements may exist on the Purchase Order to provide data prior to shipment or with shipment for acceptance. Seller is responsible to review and comply with all requirements for shipment of data.\n4. The seller shall attach one ASN print out to the exterior to the packaging and the other shall be attached to the packing list. If multiple shipments for a Purchase Order Line Item are made on the same day, use the Pack Items feature within the ASN for all the boxes, unless directed otherwise on the Purchase Order. The Pack Items shows the total number of boxes being shipped on the ASN and creates the same number of printable ASN labels.\n","MFC-DC-002","The Seller shall submit all data electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment when documentation requirements are specified in the purchase order. The Seller shall create an Inbound Delivery barcode (IBD) and include the manufacturer's cage code, any applicable traceability data (Heat Lot, Date Code, Lot Number, etc.) and upload any applicable documentation.\n\nPaper copies are not required with the shipment of material when traceability data has been provided electronically and/or documentation has been uploaded in the IBD. The Seller is responsible for assuring objective evidence is retained for all information provided electronically. Material received at the Buyer without electronic data/documentation may be subject to rejection and return at the Seller's expense.\n\nAdditional requirements may exist on this purchase order to provide data prior to shipment or with shipment for acceptance. Seller is responsible to review and comply with all requirements for shipment of data.\n\nIf multiple shipments for a Purchase Order Line Item are made on the same day, use the cartons feature on the ship-to module to create a single IBD barcode number for all the boxes, unless directed otherwise on the Purchase Order. The cartons feature shows the total number of boxes being shipped on the IBD and creates the same number of printable barcodes.\nLM Procure To Pay (P2P) ship to module training is available at: https://myexostar.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/LMP2P-Quality-Ship-To.pdf\n\nIf you require further assistance regarding electronic data submittals contact LM P2P helpdesk at 863-647-0558.  Questions specific to purchase order information should be directed to the Buyer's Procurement Representative.\n\nRefer to the following link for P2P Exostar How-To videos for guidance\nhttps://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources#videos"]
["1LM-SQ-006","Supplier Process Change Control and Notification Requirements","Requirements for all Sellers:\n1. Seller shall notify Buyer, in writing, within 10 working days of any of the following:\n        a. Issuance of any major Level II or Level III Corrective Action Request associated with Buyer Items, QMS, or processes associated with Buyer Items \n        b. Issuance of a major finding by a third-party registrar \n        c. Suspension of Government Source Inspection\n        d. Change in Seller’s quality system status\n       e. Change in Seller’s special process accreditations \n       f. Loss of third-party registrar’s certification status\n       g. Adverse action taken by a US Government entity (e.g. FAA, CAA, OSHA, DoD, EPA, NASA, etc.), third party registrar, International Government Agencies, National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program (NADCAP) or other governing entity.\n       h. Major organizational or key personnel change that affects the quality program\n2. Seller shall provide actions taken and/or planned actions related to any events listed above with the written notification.  \n3. Seller shall provide the approved corrective actions taken in response to any adverse actions reported above within 30 days of the written notification. \n4. Seller shall permit Buyer access to data in OASIS and NADCAP databases including registration documentation, certification, audit reports, findings, corrective actions, etc.  \n5. Seller shall promptly notify buyer whey they become aware or reasonably suspects that any product delivered to Buyer is, or contains a component that is, subject to a recall notice, warning alert, GIDEP Alert, and/or any other type of notification or concern regarding product authenticity, quality, safety, process integrity, and/or specification compliance. \n6. In an event of Sale, Relocation, or Closure of Seller's Facility or Transfer of Manufacturing Operations, Seller shall notify Buyer, in writing, at least (90 days) in advance of any sale, relocation, or closure of Seller's facility or transfer of manufacturing operations (subject to any legal or regulatory restrictions).\n7. Seller shall include the following, as a minimum, in the written notification \n        a. Purpose of the applicable change \n        b. Address of the new location(s), when applicable \n        c. Assessment of actual or potential impact to current Purchase Orders\n        d. Risk mitigation plan to ensure compliance to existing requirements \n        e. Plan defining the identification, storage, protection, retrieval, and retention of records, if applicable \n        f. Master schedule and timeline of applicable change activity, and Relocation Coordinator/Point of Contact, if applicable \n        g. Updated DUNS information, when applicable \n\nAdditional requirements for buyer controlled part Numbers, vendor item control, or source control drawings:\n1. Seller shall not implement, or otherwise deliver to Buyer, products incorporating any \"material change\" without the express prior written approval from the Buyer. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld but shall be dependent upon the Seller’s thorough documentation of such proposed changes (including any analysis necessary to confirm continued suitability). Seller’s notification and Buyer’s approval of \"material changes\" shall not be interpreted to waive any other contractual requirement(s) or to otherwise relieve Seller from delivering fully compliant products. \n\nAdditional requirements for seller part numbers or industry standard parts: \n1. Prior to delivering any products incorporating a “material change”, Seller should provide advance notice to Buyer, as they become aware and allow sufficient time to reasonably evaluate the change and, if necessary, to place an end-of-life order for the unchanged products. \n2. Where applicable, Seller shall notify Buyer of changes to form, fit, function, and/or obsolescence that may affect end item performance to products purchased within the last 24 months of the change date. These notifications should be submitted as the Seller becomes aware, this includes seller designed and Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) products within Lockheed Martin Technical Design Package.\n \nDefinition: \nMaterial Change - any alterations to product form, fit, and/or function, reliability, the design (including Software/Firmware), technical specifications, materials, component sourcing, production process, inspection & testing techniques, whether instigated by Seller or its Sub-tier suppliers. ","MFC-CC-001\nMFC-CC-004","Some or all of the products acquired under this agreement will be incorporated into higher level assemblies that may be subject to stringent “qualification testing” requirements for critical government applications; even minor changes to Seller’s products or processes may necessitate “requalification” or produce unacceptable results in higher level assemblies. Since the impact of any such product/process change can be most efficiently assessed prior to product integration into higher level assemblies and the potential cost of remediation/retrofit activities for end products deployed worldwide could be substantial, as a cardinal commitment under this contract, Seller expressly commits to: \n\n1) Maintain a robust sourcing/quality process for the products delivered hereunder;\n\n2) Rigorously comply with the notification requirements specified below; and\n\n3) Include provisions with its sub-tier suppliers that are adequate to implement the requirements of this provision.\n\nFor Lockheed Martin Designed Products or Provided Technical Design Packages:\n\nPrior Approval/Notification – Form/Fit/Function/Material Changes:\n\n* Prior Approval:  Seller shall not implement, or otherwise deliver to Buyer, products incorporating any alterations to product form, fit, and/or function without the express prior written approval of the Buyer Procurement Representative.  Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld but shall be dependent upon Seller’s thorough documentation of such proposed changes (including any analysis necessary to confirm continued suitability). Seller’s notification and Buyer’s limited approval of such form, fit and/or function alterations shall not be interpreted to waive any other contractual requirement(s) or to otherwise relieve Seller from delivering fully compliant products to Buyer documentation.\n\n* Notification:  Prior to delivering any products incorporating a “material change”, Seller shall provide advance notice to Buyer, as they become aware and allow sufficient time to reasonably evaluate the proposed change and, if necessary, to place an end-of-life order for the unchanged products.\n* For purposes of this clause a “material change” is any alteration to the design (including Software/Firmware), technical specifications, materials, component sourcing, production process, facilities or location (from original manufacturing location), whether instigated by Seller or its sub-tier suppliers.\n\nFor Seller Design Authority and COTS Products:\n\nAll Changes: Seller shall notify Buyer of changes to form, fit, function, and/or obsolescence that may affect end item performance to products purchased within the last 24 months of the change date. Seller shall provide notification via a Product Change Notices (PCN) or some other communication method. These notifications shall be submitted to the Buyer’s Procurement Representative as the Seller becomes aware. Seller shall also notify Buyer of any changes that may affect the performance of the hardware. This includes seller designed and COTS products within Lockheed Martin Technical Design Package. \n\nRisk Notification – Product Alerts:  Buyer shall be promptly notified whenever Seller becomes aware or reasonably suspects that any product delivered to Buyer is, or contains a component that is, subject to a recall notice, warning alert, GIDEP Alert, and/or any other type of notification or concern regarding product authenticity, quality, safety, process integrity, and/or specification compliance.\n\nSale, Relocation, or Closure of Seller's Facility or Transfer of Manufacturing Operations\n\na.\tSeller shall notify Buyer, in writing, at least (90 days) in advance of any sale, relocation, or closure of Seller's facility or transfer of manufacturing operations (subject to any legal or regulatory restrictions).\n\nSeller shall include the following, as a minimum, in the written notification\nI.\tPurpose of the applicable change,\nII.\tAddress of the new location(s), when applicable,\nIII.\tAssessment of actual or potential impact to current POs,\nIV.\tRisk mitigation plan to ensure compliance to existing requirements,\nV.\tPlan defining the identification, storage, protection, retrieval and retention of records, if applicable,\nVI.\tMaster schedule and timeline of applicable change activity, and Relocation Coordinator/Point of Contact, if applicable,\nVII.\tUpdated DUNS information, when applicable.\n\nIf a QMS and\\or Special Process requirements are invoked on the purchase order, then the following requirements are applicable: \n\nSeller shall notify Buyer in writing within 10 calendar days of any of the following:\nI.\tChange in Seller's quality system status; special process accreditations or\nII.\tLoss of third party registrar's certification status; or\nIII.\tAdverse action taken by a US Government entity, third party registrar, International Government Agencies, or National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program (Nadcap)\nIV.\tSeller shall provide actions taken or planned actions related to any events listed above with the written notification.\nV.\tSeller shall provide within 30 calendar days of the written notification the approved corrective actions taken in response to any adverse actions reported above.\nVI.\tSeller shall permit Buyer access to data in OASIS and Nadcap databases including registration documentation, certification, audit reports, findings, corrective actions, etc."]
["1LM-SQ-007","Facility Access","1. The seller is required to grant or arrange access for the buyer, the buyer's customers, and/or regulatory agency personnel to all facilities where work related to this contract is being performed or is scheduled to be performed. This access includes facilities of the seller's sub-tier suppliers and is to be provided for the purpose of conducting item inspections, surveys, or system/process surveillance to verify compliance with the requirements of this Purchase Order. Any access of the seller's facilities or seller's sub-tier suppliers would be mutually agreed to buy buyer and seller for scope and time of visit. \n2. Seller shall flow this quality requirement for facility access to its sub-tier suppliers and\\or agents with instructions that it is to be flowed down to subcontractors at every tier. ","MFC-PR-005","Seller shall provide or obtain for Buyer, Buyer’s customers and regulatory agency personnel, access to any and all facilities where work is being performed or is scheduled to be performed, including those facilities of Seller's sub-tier suppliers, in order to perform item inspections, surveys or system/process surveillance as part of verification of conformance to the requirements of this contract. Access shall be coordinated by the buyer and seller prior to buyer access.\n\nSeller's denial of any such access may result in termination of contracted work.\n\nSeller shall flow this quality requirement for facility access to its subcontractors with instructions that it is to be flowed down to subcontractors at every tier."]
["1LM-SQ-008","Control of Nonconforming Product / Material Review Process","Once a deviation or waiver (nonconforming) condition is identified, continuing to add value to the item(s) without Buyer approval is at Seller risk. Unless otherwise specified in this purchase order or other contractual documentation, the Seller and/or any of their suppliers/subcontractors do not have authority to process use-as-is, repair, or standard repair procedures via their Material Review Board (MRB).\n\nThis MRB authority requirement is not applicable to Commercial Off the Shelf Products (COTS).\n\nThese dispositions, including Request for Deviations and Request for Waivers, require Buyer MRB disposition and shall be submitted to the Buyer for approval (this does not include rework or scrap). The Seller shall utilize the Apriso Supplier Portal to document MRB requests.\n\nBuyer and Buyer’s customers retains the right to verify, accept, and/or reject implementation of the approved nonconformance disposition. (Seller shall not scrap or rework Buyer Furnished Material without prior written authorization from Buyer.)\n\nDefinitions for Rework, Repair, Use-As-Is, Deviation, and Waiver are as follows: \nRework - Work performed in reprocessing material to make it conform to the contract requirements. A rework item complies with drawing or other specified requirements following the application of the rework process. \nRepair - A process designed to make material acceptable for its intended function, but not in conformance with documentation or other specified requirements. Repair is distinguished from rework in that the item to be repaired shall not comply with applicable drawings after the repair but shall be acceptable for the intended use. \nUse-As-Is (UAI) - A disposition of material with a minor defect when the appropriate authority determines that the material is satisfactory for use without any additional rework or repair. Defects other than minor, must be reworked to a minor level prior to being documented as use-as-is. \nDeviation - A written authorization, granted prior to the manufacture of an item, to depart from a specification or drawing for a specific unit(s) or a specific period.\nWaiver - A written authorization to accept an item, which during production or inspection, is found to depart from specified requirements. ","MFC-PR-002","Once a deviation or waiver (nonconforming) condition is identified, continuing to add value to the item(s) without Buyer approval is at Seller risk.  Unless otherwise specified in this purchase order or other contractual documentation, the Seller and/or any of their suppliers/subcontractors do not have authority to process use-as-is, repair, or standard repair procedures via their Material Review Board (MRB).\n\nThis MRB authority requirement is not applicable to Commercial Off the Shelf Products (COTS).\n\nThese dispositions, including Request for Deviations and Request for Waivers, require Buyer MRB disposition and shall be submitted to the Buyer for approval (this does not include rework or scrap).  The Seller shall utilize LMMFC Form 3-50370 (Request for Deviation/Waiver), DD Form 1694 or an equivalent Seller form for submittal to the Buyer of record for Lockheed Martin approval. Buyer retains the right to verify implementation of the approved nonconformance disposition. A copy of form ‘MFC 3-50370’ is located at https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/suppliers/mfc/mfc-quality-MFC-3-50370-042025.docx\n\nDefinitions for Use-as-is, Repair, Rework, Deviation, and Waiver are as follows:\n\nDeviation- A written authorization, granted prior to the manufacture of an item, to depart from a specification or drawing for a specific unit(s) or a specific period.\n\nRework- Work performed in reprocessing material to make it conform to the contract requirements. A rework item complies with drawing or other specified requirements following the application of the rework process.\n\nRepair- A process designed to make material acceptable for its intended function, but not in conformance with documentation or other specified requirements. Repair is distinguished from rework in that the item to be repaired shall not comply with applicable drawings after the repair, but shall be acceptable for the intended use.\n\nUse-As-Is (UAI)- A disposition of material with a minor defect when the appropriate authority determines that the material is satisfactory for use without any additional rework or repair. Defects other than minor, must be reworked to a minor level prior to being documented as use-as-is.\n\nWaiver- A written authorization to accept an item, which during production or inspection, is found to depart from specified requirements."]
["1LM-SQ-009","Quality Record Retention - Auto-flow","1. Quality records shall be maintained for the lifetime of the Purchase Order (PO) plus a minimum of 7 years after Purchase Order closure, or for longer periods if specified elsewhere on this PO. \n2. Quality records shall be established and maintained by the Seller to provide evidence of conformity to requirements and the effective operation of the Seller's QMS. As a minimum, quality records such as  inspection reports, test reports, certifications, chemical, physical reports, and etc. shall be maintained. \n3. Records may be archived to an offsite location but shall remain legible and readily retrievable. Buyer reserves the right to periodically audit the Seller's historical records, retention policies, and practices. \n4. The Seller shall notify the Buyer of any organizational actions that may affect record retention compliance. This may include but is not limited to company merges, closures, or acquisitions. ","MFC-DC-001","Quality and inspection records shall be established and maintained by the Seller to provide evidence of conformity to requirements and the effective operation of the Quality Management System.\n\nAs a minimum, quality and inspection records (such as first article inspection, test reports and certifications, including chemical/or physical reports) shall be established and maintained for a period of seven (7) years after completion of this Purchase Order (PO) or as otherwise stated elsewhere in this PO.\n\nRecords may be archived to an offsite location, but shall remain legible and readily retrievable. These records shall be available for review by Buyer or its customers.\n\nBuyer reserves the right to periodically audit the Seller's historical records, retention policies and practices.\n\nFor THAAD Program only - prior to removing the records from retention, regardless of time, Seller shall inform the Buyer."]
["1LM-SQ-010","Corrective Action, Preventive Action, Request and Reporting","1. When required, the Seller agrees to provide a formal response to all Supplier Corrective Action Requests (SCAR) within the timeframe indicated in the Apriso Supplier Portal. \n2. Documentation of root cause, containment, corrective action, preventive action, and effectivity will be submitted for Buyer approval.","MFC-PR-004","When required, the Seller agrees to provide a formal response to all Supplier Corrective Action Request (SCAR) within the timeframe indicated on the SCAR in the LM Procure To Pay system at: http://portal.exostar.com.\n\nDocumentation of root cause, containment, corrective action, preventive action and effectivity to be submitted for Buyer approval. Failure to provide a formal SCAR response within the established time frame shall adversely affect your supplier quality rating and may impact future procurements.\n\nSeller shall contact the Buyer’s SCAR Coordinator, found in the P2P SCAR, when the material associated with a SCAR investigation has not been returned to the Seller, or if more time is required to adequately perform an investigation.\n\nA supplier corrective action tool ​and Root Cause Corrective Action (RCCA) Course is available to aid your investigation, located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html\n\nA SCAR processing guidebook can be located at https://myexostar.com/?ht_kb=lmp2p-training-resources"]
["1LM-SQ-011","Material Revision Control","1. When revision is identified on the purchase order, the revision of material delivered shall match the revision identified on the purchase order. \n2. Sellers with Design Authority shall use the latest released design revision as determined by the Seller’s configuration control system or Technical Design Package approved by Lockheed Martin when required. \n3. The Seller shall use the latest released revision for referenced military, industrial, and commercial standard part numbers, at time of the Purchase Order placement unless otherwise stated in the design documentation or by the Buyer in the contract or Purchase Order.\n4. Cancelled specifications may have cancellation notices that indicate a superseding, or suggested replacement specification. Seller does not have authority to implement the superseding or suggested replacement. Seller shall contact the Buyer for approval prior to working with the replacement specification. ","MFC-PR-001","When providing products per Buyer’s drawings, Seller shall submit documentation (i.e.: Shipping List, Certificate of Conformance, etc.), electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) with each shipment, indicating the Buyer’s drawing number and the revision level as referenced on the Purchase Order, to which the part is manufactured.\n\nDesign Authority Suppliers: When providing products per Seller’s drawings, Seller shall use the latest revision as determined by the Seller’s Technical Design Package.\n\nFor referenced military, industrial, and commercial standard part numbers, Seller shall use the latest revision at time of the Purchase Order placement unless otherwise stated in the Purchase Order.\n\nCANCELLED SPECIFICATIONS:\nWhen a military specification and/or standard has been cancelled and/or replaced, Seller shall contact the Buyer to determine the applicable specification and its revision."]
["1LM-SQ-012","Packaging Auto-flow","1. The Seller shall comply with packaging requirements identified in Buyer drawings, Statement of Work, or on the Purchase Order.\r\n2. Unless otherwise stated, the Seller will determine how to package products to prevent corrosion, contamination, deterioration, foreign object damage, ESD damage, physical damage, and other Seller identified shipment/packing risks during transit and storage. This may follow commercial industry standards such as ASTM D3951 or military practices such as MIL-STD-2073.\r\n3. Polyethylene Plastic material such as Pink Poly material shall not be used as a packaging material in direct contact with electro-mechanical/electronic/electrical components (i.e. as an insert in waffle packs or trays).  \r\n4. The Seller's packaging and/or cushioning material shall be ethically sourced, reusable, recyclable, and recoverable to the maximum extent possible. ","MFC-PK-001","Preservation, packaging, and packing of all deliverable goods shall be in accordance with the latest revision of ASTM D3951, standard practice for commercial packaging, unless other requirements are specified in this order.\n\nPolyethylene Plastic material such as Pink Poly material shall not be used as a packaging material in direct contact with electro-mechanical/electronic/electrical components (i.e. as an insert in waffle packs or trays). \n\nNote: “Pink Poly” is a term commonly used to refer to polyethylene plastic treated with an antistatic agent."]
["1LM-SQ-013","Part Substitution Requirements","All parts supplied to this order must strictly adhere to the identified part numbers, drawings, and specifications. Any proposed substitutions, including upgraded, alternate, or equivalent parts, must be approved in writing by Lockheed Martin prior to shipment. If the PN specified on the PO is incorrect, obsolete, or different, the Lockheed Martin buyer must be notified immediately for evaluation and written direction. ","MFC-PR-018","No substitutions permissible, parts must be exactly as ordered (i.e. failure rate, reliability, tolerance, etc). If better parts are received, they will be rejected and returned to Seller at Seller's expense."]
["1LM-SQ-014","Foreign Object Damage","1. Seller should maintain a Foreign Object Damage (FOD) prevention program. As a guideline, Seller may maintain a FOD Prevention Program using one of the following specifications: \na. Aerospace Standard AS9146, \"Foreign Object Damage (FOD) Prevention Program - Requirements for Aviation, Space, or Defense Organizations\"\nb. National Aerospace Standard 412 (NAS 412), \"Foreign Object Damage/Foreign Object Debris Prevention\"\n2. Whenever or wherever Foreign Object Debris (FOd) can be entrapped or Foreign Objects (FO) can migrate, Seller shall ensure that applicable FOD prevention requirements are flowed down to Seller’s subcontractors at every tier.\n3. Prior to closing inaccessible or obscured areas and compartments during assembly, Seller shall inspect for FO/materials and ensure no protective devices (e.g., bags, caps, covers, plugs) remain embedded. Seller shall ensure tooling, jigs, fixtures and test or handling equipment are maintained in a state of cleanliness and repair sufficient to prevent FOd and FOD.\n4. By delivering material to Buyer, Seller shall be deemed to have certified to Buyer that such material and packaging are free from any FO/FOd.","",0]
["1LM-SQ-101","Physical Data Submission And Barcode","1. The Supplier shall not upload any data, documentation, certificates, drawings, etc. electronically. Instead, the Supplier shall deliver all required data in physical form. Physical copies of data shall be delivered with each shipment as required by data deliverable requirements. The Supplier shall ensure that all physical copies of data are clearly labeled and organized in a manner that facilitates easy review and processing by the Buyer. Material received at the Buyer without physical data/documentation may be subject to rejection and return at the Seller's expense. \n2. If multiple shipments for a Purchase Order Line Item are made on the same day, use the Pack Items feature within the ASN for all the boxes, unless directed otherwise on the Purchase Order. The Pack Items shows the total number of boxes being shipped on the ASN and creates the same number of printable ASN labels. The Seller shall print and attach the barcode to each container being shipped.\n","",0]
["1LM-SQ-102","Material Review Authority (See Contract Agreement For Program)","The supplier is delegated material review authority for all article characteristics contained in supplier drawings that are not specified requirements of the Lockheed Martin drawings or Purchase Agreement and do not have a direct effect on such specified requirements. If the supplier is uncertain as to the effect on specified requirements, the concurrence of the Lockheed Martin Quality Representative shall be obtained. This authority does not extend to the use of Material Review Board (MRB) for the purpose of changing engineering criteria, which can only be accomplished by drawing change. This delegation is contingent on Lockheed Martin's approval of the supplier's capability to meet the intent of MIL-STD-1520 and is subject to review at any time by Lockheed Martin. Material Review records, reports, documentation and qualification of personnel will be made available to the Lockheed Martin Quality Representative upon request. This delegation of material review authority can be rescinded at any time by written notification from Lockheed Martin Quality.","",0]
["1LM-SQ-103","Drop Ship","Articles ordered under this contract are to be drop shipped to a destination other than Lockheed Martin. Final acceptance is contingent on the submittal and approval of the Quality data.","MFC-PK-007","This material is scheduled to be drop shipped to a destination other than Lockheed Martin.\n\nWhen Source Activities are required by the Buyer, the Seller shall perform those activities electronically and upload all documentation using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment."]
["1LM-SQ-104","Statement Of Work/Statement Of Requirements Flowdown","Articles defined in this Purchase Order are subject to additional requirements per a Statement of Work (SOW) / Statement of Requirements (SOR), which must be met to achieve compliance to contract requirements. Articles will not be accepted by Buyer if Seller fails to comply with the requirements of the SOW / SOR.","MFC-PR-019","A Statement of Work (SOW)/Statement of Requirements (SOR) and/or Procurement Specification document are applicable to this Purchase Order (PO).\n\nRequirements contained within the SOW/SOR/Procurement Specification are in addition to the quality requirements contained elsewhere in the PO.\n\nArticles will not be accepted by the Buyer if the Seller fails to comply with these requirements."]
["1LM-SQ-105","Statistical Process Control (SPC)","Seller shall utilize Statistical Process Control (SPC) techniques as a preferred methodology to ensure production hardware quality and conformity. SPC shall be used to measure, analyze, and eliminate source of variations detrimental to product quality. SPC shall be administered by the Seller in areas of highest potential benefit and is encouraged to use nationally recognized standards, such as, ANSI Z1.1, Z1.2, Z1.3, when applying SPC.\n\nSeller shall prepare an SPC program plan which will be utilized during production of the articles ordered under this Purchase Order (PO). The program should contain the following as a minimum:\n(1) The applicable PO number, part number, revision level, part name, and Seller's name.\n(2) A time-phased schedule for implementation.\n(3) A listing of production processes (i.e., soldering, machining, plating, casting, etc.) and the points within the production flow where these processes shall be subjected to SPC.\n(4) For each identified process, a flow diagram shall describe those characteristics that are to be monitored and controlled. Variable and/or attribute data may be considered.\n(5) For each characteristic identified, the criteria for determining appropriate control limits and the action to be taken upon reaching these limits, including corrective action procedures.\n(6) The methodology for collecting and documenting SPC data, including items such as control charts/diagrams, defect, analysis, capability study format and application, measuring instruments and standards.\n(7) When sampling is to be used, identification for the sample size and frequency of measurement is required. Additionally, the criteria used for modifying sample size and frequency shall be specified.\n(8) Flowdown of controls to be employed at subcontract level, when applicable.\n(9) The training program in SPC techniques and the required qualification for personnel.\n\nThe SPC program plan, consisting of the aforementioned items, shall be submitted to the Buyer's Quality Engineering for approval prior to SPC program plan implementation. Seller shall notify the Buyer's Quality Engineering of subsequent changes affecting the SPC plan. Periodic on-site evaluation of the SPC plan/procedures may be conducted at the discretion of the Buyer.\n\nSPC control charts/performance data shall be validated by an authorized Seller's representative, by either an inspection stamp or signature. Data shall include: lot numbers, date codes, PO numbers, part numbers, revision level, part name, Seller's name, etc. Seller shall maintain all documentation on file as specified by the PO.","MFC-TS-004","Seller shall utilize Statistical Process Control (SPC) techniques as a preferred methodology to ensure production hardware quality and conformity. SPC shall be used to measure, analyze, and eliminate source of variations detrimental to product quality. SPC shall be administered by the Seller in areas of highest potential benefit and is encouraged to use nationally recognized standards, such as, ANSI Z1.1, Z1.2, Z1.3, when applying SPC.\n\nSeller shall prepare an SPC program plan which will be utilized during production of the articles ordered under this purchase order (PO). The program should contain the following as a minimum:\n\n(1) The applicable PO number, part number, revision level, part\n    name, and Seller's name.\n(2) A time-phased schedule for implementation.\n(3) A listing of production processes (i.e., soldering,\n    machining, plating, casting, etc.) and the points within the\n    production flow where these processes shall be subjected to\n    SPC.\n(4) For each identified process, a flow diagram shall describe\n    those characteristics that are to be monitored and\n    controlled. Variable and/or attribute data may be\n    considered.\n(5) For each characteristic identified, the criteria for\n    determining appropriate control limits and the action to be\n    taken upon reaching these limits, including corrective\n    action procedures.\n(6) The methodology for collecting and documenting SPC data,\n    including items such as control charts/diagrams, defect,\n    analysis, capability study format and application, measuring\n    instruments and standards.\n(7) When sampling is to be used, identification for the sample\n    size and frequency of measurement is required. additionally,\n    the criteria used for modifying sample size and frequency\n    shall be specified.\n(8) Flowdown of controls to be employed at subcontract level,\n    when applicable.\n(9) The training program in SPC techniques and the required\n    qualification for personnel.\n\nThe SPC program plan, consisting of the aforementioned items, shall be submitted to the Buyer's Quality Engineering for approval prior to SPC program plan implementation. Seller shall notify the Buyer's Quality Engineering of subsequent changes affecting the SPC plan. Periodic on-site evaluation of the SPC plan/procedures may be conducted at the discretion of the Buyer.\n\nSPC control charts/performance data shall be validated by an authorized Seller's representative, by either an inspection stamp or signature. Data shall include: lot numbers, date codes, PO numbers, part numbers, revision level, part name, Seller's name, etc. Seller shall maintain all documentation on file as specified by the PO."]
["1LM-SQ-106","Buyer Furnished / Government Furnished Tooling / Equipment","The requirements of this quality note are applicable only if Lockheed Martin buyer or government tooling/equipment is provided or acquired in the performance of this Purchase Order.\n\nDefinition:\nThe term \"tooling / equipment\", as used herein, shall include all Buyer or government owned tools/equipment (examples: production tools, special test equipment, special inspection tooling, certified tools, and lifting devices).\n\nSeller Receiving Inspection:\nAll tooling and test equipment furnished by the Buyer or the government for performance of work hereunder shall be promptly inspected by seller upon receipt to determine all tooling details have been received (inventory against the tool design drawing) undamaged. Any discrepancy shall be reported in writing to the Buyer, who will furnish instructions as to action required.\n\nSeller shall adhere to any and all additional buyer or government-furnished equipment requirements as stated in additional documentation or resources provided elsewhere. ","MFC-IN-011","The requirements of this Purchase Order (PO) quality note are in addition to any other tooling requirements elsewhere within this PO.\n\nThe requirements of this quality note are applicable only if Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (LMMFC) buyer or government tooling/equipment is provided or acquired in the performance of this Purchase Order.\n\nDefinition:\nThe term \"tooling / equipment\", as used herein, shall include all Buyer or government owned tools/equipment (examples: production tools, special test equipment, special inspection tooling, certified tools, and lifting devices). This includes control of all Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 Special Tooling (ST). \n\n•\tClass 1 ST is inspected, acceptance ST (Requires Calibration)\n•\tClass 2 ST is inspected, non-acceptance ST\n​•\tClass 3 ST is non-inspected ST\n\n​All tooling shall be referenced in production/work instructions. ​\n \nSeller Receiving Inspection:\nAll tooling and test equipment furnished by the Buyer or the government for performance of work hereunder shall be promptly inspected by seller upon receipt to determine all tooling details have been received (inventory against the tool design drawing) undamaged.  Any discrepancy shall be reported in writing to the Buyer, who will furnish instructions as to action required.\n\nAccountability:\nThe Seller shall be responsible and accountable for all tooling provided under this purchase order.  Seller shall not dispose, transfer, or return tooling without proper notification and written authorization from the Buyer.  The Seller's quality system shall define tool storage requirements, to include periodic preservation/condition checks for all tools in storage.  Additional accountability shall be in accordance with the annual Dallas Property Management Control Survey form MFC-0997 (3-86310 - Jan 2009). \n\nBuyer may authorize by written notice from the Buyer the use of the tooling hereunder for performance on other Purchase Orders.  Such authorization must be in advance of any changed use.\n\nMovement of Government Owned Tooling/Equipment:\nThe Seller shall complete form DD1149 for all movements of government owned tools/equipment.  A copy of the DD1149 shall be sent via e-mail to the Buyer’s Government Property Control, \"lmmfc-gpc.gr-dal@lmco.com\"\n \nModification to Seller Designed Tooling/Equipment:\nNo modification to the tooling acquired or manufactured to produce production items, shall be accomplished without the prior written consent of the Buyer.  Upon completion of any modification, Seller shall promptly report each modification, giving the following:\n-  Tool identification number\n-  New configuration revision level\n-  Nomenclature\n-  Part number made from tool\n-  Description of modification (copy of old revision drawing & New revision drawing)\n-  Cost of tool modification\n-  PO number\n\nModification to Buyer Designed Tooling/Equipment:\nNo modification, repair, or rework of the Buyer designed tooling / equipment shall be performed without buyer approval via an approved Tool Action Request (TAR).  Prior to modification, repair, or rework, the Seller shall contact the Buyer's Procurement Representative for approval. \n\nSpecial Seller acceptance tools - requirements for control and accountability:\n\nIn addition to the other requirements set forth herein, acceptance tooling/equipment shall require the following:\nAll tools to be used for hardware acceptance must be documented on drawings made to good commercial practices and capable of being reproduced.\n\nPrior to tool fabrication, Seller shall submit to the Buyer for review and approval two copies of the tool design package.\n\nGood commercial practices as related to tool design, means that the design must be adequate to provide all information necessary to fabricate an exact duplicate tool by any competent tooling manufacturer.\n\nThe tool drawing must include a complete bill of material, all heat treatment requirements, finish, tolerance, and/or coordination information pertinent to fabrication and functional integrity of the tool/ equipment.\n\nCompliance with requirements of the design criteria checklist, as specified in section a below, is required.\n\nThe package shall consist of drawings, operating instructions and inspection/ test plans for each acceptance tool to be built or acquired for accepting hardware during the course of this purchase order unless otherwise covered by written exception agreed to by the buyer and the seller.  This includes gages, inspection, or fabrication tools / equipment.\n\nTooling/equipment to be used for hardware acceptance requires inspection and acceptance by quality control.  Tooling / equipment to be used for hardware acceptance shall be periodically re-verified and/or recalibrated in accordance with the applicable tool maintenance plan, calibration procedure and calibration standard, at intervals established by quality engineering.  The terms quality control and quality engineering, as used in this paragraph, are LMMFC buyer for LMMFC buyer designed tooling and seller for seller designed tooling.\n\nUnless otherwise covered by written exception agreed to by the Buyer and the Seller, periodic recalibration will be the responsibility of the Seller.\n\nThe Seller shall be responsible to create and maintain inspection records for all tools used for hardware acceptance, including periodic re-verification/calibration records.\n\nPrimary Identification Number (PIN):\nWhere the Seller has assigned to the tooling a Seller identification number, this Seller identification may be used by the Buyer as the Primary Identification Number (PIN).  Where a Seller identification number has not been assigned, the Buyer will assign a prefixed PIN for identification and marking of tooling/equipment.  All tooling assigned a PIN by the Seller or the Buyer shall be physically identified with a Buyer provided identification tag.\n\nSection A:\nDesign criteria checklist for acceptance tooling/gages acquired by and used at seller's facility to accept Buyer production hardware\n\nStandard gage makers tolerances will apply (i.e. 10% of part tolerances on gages)\nProduction tooling used as a media of acceptance shall not exceed 50% of the part tolerance\nAll tooling will be dimensioned and toleranced compatible to geometric dimensioning as required by ANSI Y14.5M or ASME Y14.5m\nDrawings will be made to good commercial practices (i.e. the design must provide all information necessary to fabricate an exact duplicate tool without reference to any other document other than the tool drawing).\n\nTool/equipment designs shall include:\n-  A complete bill of materials.\n-  Complete dimensioning of all details either on the assembly or detail views.\n-  Commercial hardware such as dowels, socket head cap screws, etc.  May be identified in the bill of material only.\n\nTool equipment drawings must contain the following information:\n-  Tool numbers\n-  Tool drawing and revision letter\n-  Hardness finish and stabilization requirements must be specified.\n-  A complete set of operating instructions.  Operating instructions shall be a minimum size of 8 1/2 x 11 sheets properly identified by drawing sheet number.\n-  Tool drawing/instructions must list all features checked and used as acceptance criteria by the tool.\n- A recommended frequency of calibration.\n \nBuyer Provided Lifting and Handling Tools:\n\nThe Seller shall be responsible for maintenance and inspection of all lifting and/or handling devices provided by the Buyer to applicable OSHA safety and maintenance requirements.​"]
["1LM-SQ-108","Foreign Object Detection (FOD) Prevention","1. Seller shall maintain a Foreign Object Damage (FOD) prevention program. As a guideline, Seller may maintain a FOD Prevention Program using one of the following specifications: \n a. Aerospace Standard AS9146, Foreign Object Damage (FOD) Prevention Program - Requirements for Aviation, Space, or Defense Organizations  \n b. National Aerospace Standard 412 (NAS 412), Foreign Object Damage/Foreign Object Debris Prevention.  \n2. Whenever or wherever Foreign Object Debris (FOd) can be entrapped or Foreign Objects (FO) can migrate, Seller shall ensure that applicable FOD prevention requirements are flowed down to Seller’s subcontractors at every tier. \n3. By delivering Items to Buyer, Seller shall be deemed to have certified to Buyer that such items and packaging are free from any FO/FOd. ","MFC-PR-008","Seller shall maintain a FOD Prevention Program using Aerospace Standard AS9146, Foreign Object Damage (FOD) Prevention Program - Requirements for Aviation, Space, or Defense Organizations or National Aerospace Standard 412 (NAS 412), Foreign Object Damage/Foreign Object Debris Prevention as a guideline.\n\nWhenever or wherever Foreign Object Debris (FOD) can be entrapped or Foreign Objects (FO) can migrate, Seller shall ensure that applicable FOD prevention requirements are flowed down to Seller’s subcontractors at every tier.\n\nBy delivering Items to Buyer, Seller shall be deemed to have certified to Buyer that such Items and packaging are free from any FO/FOD."]
["1LM-SQ-109","Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) Membership","1. If Seller is eligible for GIDEP membership, Seller is required to be a member of GIDEP.\na. Per GIDEP Website/ Manual, GIDEP membership is limited to U.S. and Canadian government departments, agencies, and activities and industry organizations that directly or indirectly do business with the U.S. or Canadian government and have agreed to comply with GIDEP policies and procedures. \nb. The policy of the Department of Defense (DoD) is that all DoD components and activities fully support and maximize their participation in GIDEP in accordance with their implementing directives. \n2. The Seller shall implement a process for reviewing and evaluating problems identified in GIDEP alerts. Seller shall ensure that these alerts do not adversely affect previous, current, or future procurements/deliveries, and that new designs or redesigns and seller's supply chain transactions consider relevant GIDEP information, including diminishing manufacturing sources/material shortages (DMS/MS).  \n3. The Seller is responsible for flow down of this requirement to eligible Sub-tier suppliers, and for assuring Sub-tier supplier compliance with the requirements.","MFC-PR-014","Per GIDEP Website/Manual, GIDEP membership is limited to U.S. and Canadian government departments, agencies, and activities and industry organizations that directly or indirectly do business with the U.S. or Canadian government and have agreed to comply with GIDEP policies and procedures.\n\nThe policy of the Department of Defense (DoD) is that all DoD components and activities fully support and maximize their participation in GIDEP in accordance with their implementing directives.\n\nIf Seller is eligible for GIDEP membership, Seller is required to be a member of GIDEP. The  Seller shall implement a process for reviewing and evaluating problems identified in either GIDEP alerts or “GIDEPs.”\n\nThe Seller shall implement a process for reviewing and evaluating problems identified in GIDEP database. Seller shall ensure that these GIDEPs do not adversely affect previous, current, or future procurements/deliveries, and that new designs or redesigns and seller's supply chain transactions consider relevant GIDEP information, including diminishing manufacturing sources/material shortages (DMS/MS)."]
["1LM-SQ-111","Variation Management - AS9103","Variation management in accordance with aerospace standard AS9103 is required for the item/s on this purchase order. The seller shall develop a process control document as defined in AS9103. The seller shall submit the process control document for buyer approval.","MFC-IN-007","Variation management in accordance with aerospace standard AS9103 is required for the item/s on this purchase order. The seller shall develop a process control document as defined in AS9103. The seller shall submit the process control document for buyer approval."]
["1LM-SQ-112","Government Assessment ","During the performance of this contract, the Seller's manufacturing processes, products, and associated inspection and/or test data are subject to review via product examination or process review by an authorized Government Representative.\n\nSeller shall furnish reasonable facilities access and assistance for the safe and convenient performance of these duties at no additional cost to the Government.\n\nThe Government has the right to inspect and test all supplies called for by the contract, to the extent practicable, at all places and times, including the period of manufacture, and in any event before acceptance. The Government shall perform inspections and tests in a manner that will not unduly delay the work. The Government assumes no contractual obligation to perform any inspection and test for the benefit of the Contractor unless specifically set forth elsewhere in this contract.\n\nUpon receipt of this order, promptly notify the Government Representative who normally services your facility so that appropriate planning for Government Assessment can be accomplished and determined if Product Examinations and/or Process Reviews will be required. In the event the Representative or office cannot be located, the Seller shall notify the Buyer immediately.\n\nSeller shall notify the Buyer of any requests for action issued by the Government (GCAR, audit findings, etc.).","MFC-SS-002","During the performance of this contract, the Seller's manufacturing processes, products, and associated inspection and/or test data are subject to review via product examination or process review by an authorized Government Representative.\n \nSeller shall furnish reasonable facilities access and assistance for the safe and convenient performance of these duties at no additional cost to the Government.\n \nThe Government has the right to inspect and test all supplies called for by the contract, to the extent practicable, at all places and times, including the period of manufacture, and in any event before acceptance. The Government shall perform inspections and tests in a manner that will not unduly delay the work. The Government assumes no contractual obligation to perform any inspection and test for the benefit of the Contractor unless specifically set forth elsewhere in this contract.\n \nUpon receipt of this order, promptly notify the United States Government Representative who normally services your facility so that appropriate planning for United States Government Assessment can be accomplished and determined if Product Examinations and/or Process Reviews will be required. In the event the Representative or office cannot be located, the Seller shall notify the Buyer immediately.\n\nSeller shall notify the Buyer of any requests for action issued by the Government (GCAR, audit findings, etc.)."]
["1LM-SQ-201","Record Retention - Indefinite","1. Quality records shall be maintained indefinitely. Prior to destruction, regardless of the length of time, the Seller shall gain written destruction approval from the Buyer. \r\n2. Quality records shall be established and maintained by the Seller to provide evidence of conformity to requirements and the effective operation of the Seller's QMS. As a minimum, quality records such as  inspection reports, test reports, certifications, chemical, physical reports, and etc. shall be maintained. \r\n3. Records may be archived to an offsite location but shall remain legible and readily retrievable. Buyer reserves the right to periodically audit the Seller's historical records, retention policies, and practices. \r\n4. The Seller shall notify the Buyer of any organizational actions that may affect record retention compliance. This may include but is not limited to company merges, closures, or acquisitions. ","",0]
["1LM-SQ-202","Quality Record Retention - 10 Years","1. Quality records shall be maintained for the lifetime of the Purchase Order plus a minimum of 10 years after Purchase Order closure.\r\n2. Quality records shall be established and maintained by the Seller to provide evidence of conformity to requirements and the effective operation of the Seller's QMS. As a minimum, quality records such as  inspection reports, test reports, certifications, chemical, physical reports, and etc. shall be maintained. \r\n3. Records may be archived to an offsite location but shall remain legible and readily retrievable. Buyer reserves the right to periodically audit the Seller's historical records, retention policies, and practices. \r\n4. The Seller shall notify the Buyer of any organizational actions that may affect record retention compliance. This may include but is not limited to company merges, closures, or acquisitions.","",0]
["1LM-TR-001","Serial Number Traceability – Seller","Serial number traceability is required for this Purchase Order. Serial number schemes shall be developed, controlled, and implemented by the Seller.\n\nEach deliverable part, assembly or end item shall be serialized. Serial numbers shall be unique for each part and must be used once only, for this or any follow-on orders. Each delivered part shall have the serial number marked in a conspicuous location on the part, unless otherwise specified by Seller.\n\nThe seller shall use any additional part marking requirements to format and apply the serial number marking on the parts.\n\nThe Apriso Supplier Portal shall be used to enter serial number traceability for the Purchase Order Line item to be shipped. ","MFC-TR-001","Serial number traceability is required for this Purchase Order.  Serial number schemes shall be developed, controlled, and implemented by the Seller, unless otherwise specified, and approved by the Buyer.\n\nEach deliverable part, assembly or end item shall be serialized sequentially and consecutively. Serial numbers shall be unique for each part and must be used once only, for this or any follow-on orders. A list of serial numbers to be shipped must be printed on the delivery sheet or attachment.\n\nThe P2P Ship-To module shall be used to enter serial number traceability for the Purchase Order Line item to be shipped."]
["1LM-TR-002","Serial Number Traceability – Buyer","Serial number traceability is required for this Purchase Order. Serial number schemes shall be developed, controlled, and implemented by the Buyer, unless otherwise specified.\n\nSerial numbers shall be unique for each part and must be used once only, for this or any follow-on orders. Each delivered part shall have the serial number marked in a conspicuous location on the part, unless otherwise specified by the Buyer.\n\nThe Seller shall use any additional part marking requirements to format and apply the serial number marking on the parts.\n\nThe Apriso Supplier Portal shall be used to enter serial number traceability for the Purchase Order Line item to be shipped.","MFC-TR-006","Serial number traceability is required for this Purchase Order.  Serial number schemes shall be developed, controlled, and implemented by the Buyer, unless otherwise specified.\n\nSerial numbers shall be unique for each part and must be used once only, for this or any follow-on orders. A list of serial numbers to be shipped must be printed on the delivery sheet or attachment.\n\nThe P2P Ship-To module shall be used to enter serial number traceability for the Purchase Order Line item to be shipped."]
["1LM-TR-010","Item Unique Identifier (IUID) - MIL-STD-130","Supplier shall create a UID label and attach to the material if the capability exists. The UID label information shall consist of the following information: Part number, date code and/or serial number, and cage code per MIL-STD-130N. Install UID label on front of item if possible.","",0]
["1LM-TR-011","Item Unique Identifier (IUID) - Data Submittal","As designated on the Buyer's engineering drawing, material delivered for this Purchase Order (PO) shall meet all the unique identification of tangible assets requirements: \n\n(1) Electronic UID Data File\n\nFor all shipments, the Seller shall submit an electronic file containing the UID information into I2S via the Subcontractor Management Portal (SMP) prior to shipment. For parent/child parts, the electronic data file shall include UID data for only parent and/or child parts that have a UID requirement.​\n\nA copy of the electronic file template (Form SDRL J0204) with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\n\n(2) Physical UID Marking / Label on Product or Tag\n\nSeller shall ensure the UID verification marking complies with minimum print quality per ISO/IEC 15415 and/or 15416.​\n\nSeller shall ensure that the materials furnished to Buyer are in conformance with applicable requirements for UID identification as specified on the engineering drawings, and that supporting documentation is on file and made available to Buyer or Government Representatives upon request.\n\n(3) UID Validation\n\nRefer to current MIL-STD-130 revision for Validation definition/guidelines. \n\n(4) Apriso Preship UID Traceability \n\nFor all shipments, Seller shall submit the UID at time of pre-ship inspection order completion. Detailed instructions on completing the pre-ship inspection order(s) can found in the External Integration Hub (EIH) My Info Center under EIH Guides","MFC-PR-012","As designated on the Buyer's engineering drawing, material delivered for this Purchase Order (PO) shall meet all the unique identification of tangible assets requirements: \n\n(1) Electronic UID Data File\n\nFor all shipments, the Seller shall submit an electronic file containing the UID information to the following email address: uid-admin.fc-mfc-dal@lmco.com prior to shipment. For parent/child parts, the electronic data file shall include UID data for only parent and/or child parts that have a UID requirement.​\n\u000bA copy of the electronic file template with detailed instructions is located at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/suppliers/business-area-procurement/mfc.html#extforms\n\n(2) Physical UID Marking / Label on Product or Tag\n\nSeller shall ensure the UID verification marking complies with minimum print quality per ISO/IEC 15415 and/or 15416.​\n\nSeller shall ensure that the materials furnished to Buyer are in conformance with applicable requirements for UID identification as specified on the engineering drawings, and that supporting documentation is on file and made available to Buyer or Government Representatives upon request.\n\n(3) UID Validation\n\nRefer to current MIL-STD-130 revision for Validation definition/guidelines. \n\n(4) Verification Report\n\nSeller shall submit a verification report electronically using the P2P Ship To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to each shipment. Refer to current MIL-STD-130 revision for Verification definition/guidelines. ​\n\n1.  Name of Seller\n2.  Quantity shipped\n3.  Purchase Order number\n4.  Concatenated unique item identifier or DOD recognized unique identification equivalent, per DFARS 252.211-7003.\n5.  Unique item identifier type\n6.  Issuing agency code (if concatenated unique item identifier is used)\n7.  Enterprise identifier (if concatenated unique item identifier is used)\n8.  Original part number\n9.  Lot or batch number\n10. Current part number (if not the same as the original part number)\n11. Current part number effective date\n12. Serial number"]
["1LM-TR-012","Item Unique Identifier (IUID) - DFARS 252.211-7003","Unique identification marking in accordance with the latest version of MIL-STD-130 is required and the development of specific item marking requirements shall be based on the criteria provided in the standard. The UID policy, with associated guidance, is available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/ and then select defense procurement acquisition policy for unique identification information. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-101","Date of Manufacture Required","The Seller shall upload the date of manufacture in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple dates of manufacture, each date shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-102","Cure Date Required","The Seller shall upload the cure date information as an attachment in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple cure dates, each date shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","MFC-PR-030","Marking of the cure date is required on all rubber or synthetic elastomers. Marking shall be on the part packaging and on the shipping documentation. "]
["1LM-TR-103","Lot Date Code Required","The Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-104","Single Lot Date Code","1. All parts supplied to this order must be from a single date of manufacture or assembly date code. Additionally, if batch or heat treatment processes are required, each shipment must be supplied from the same lot, batch, or heat treat lot. \n2. The full quantity of the delivery schedule line item must be supplied at once. If partial quantities must be shipped, buyer approval must be granted in writing prior to shipping.\n3. In case of exception, mixed lot/date codes require written authorization from the buyer, which must be provided with the shipping document. \n4. If mixed lot/date/batch codes are authorized, the shipping document must list individual lot/date/batch codes and quantity. The individual part containers should also be marked with the quantity and lot/date code. Multiple lot/date codes shall not be co-mingled.\n5. If mixed lot/date/batch codes are authorized, no single lot shall be smaller than twenty (20) units. If the delivery line item is less than twenty (20) units then all units must be supplied at once. ","MFC-TR-005","Homogeneous Material Requirement - Unless otherwise approved in writing by the Buyer, this item requires a single lot date code.\n\nMultiple line items of the same part number on a single Purchase Order shall all be from the same lot date code, unless authorization to ship multiple lot date codes is provided by the Buyer.\n\nLot size exceptions shall be granted if there are prior receipts of the same lot date code. No single lot shall be smaller than twenty (20) units unless authorized."]
["1LM-TR-105","Single Lot Date Code - Semiconductor Wafer","1. All parts supplied to this order must be from a single date of manufacture and from a single semiconductor wafer.  Additionally, if batch or heat treatment processes are required, each shipment must be supplied from the same lot, batch, or heat treat lot.\n2. The full quantity of the delivery schedule line item must be supplied at once. If partial quantities must be shipped, buyer approval must be granted in writing prior to shipping.\n3. In case of exception, mixed lot/date codes require written authorization from the buyer, which must be provided with the shipping document.\n4. If mixed lot/date/batch codes are authorized, the shipping document must list individual lot/date/batch codes and quantity. The individual part containers should also be marked with the quantity and lot/date code. Multiple lot/date codes shall not be co-mingled.\n5. If mixed lot/date/batch codes are authorized, no single lot shall be smaller than twenty (20) units. If the delivery line item is less than twenty (20) units then all units must be supplied at once. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-106","Lot/Batch/Heat Traceability","Each manufacturing lot shipped for this Purchase Order shall be separated and barcoded to accommodate single lot traceability during receipt and acceptance. Batch traceability data is required for each shipment.\n\nBatch traceability covers the following traceability methods (Date Code, Heat Lot and Lot Number). All Batch traceability is required to be entered into the Apriso Supplier Portal in support of this Purchase Order Line Item. (Enter \"N/A\" in the field that does not apply.)","MFC-TR-002\nMFC-TR-007","Each manufacturing lot shipped for this Purchase Order shall be separated and barcoded to accommodate single lot traceability during receipt and acceptance. Batch traceability data is required for each shipment.\n\nBatch traceability covers the following traceability methods (Date Code, Heat Lot and Lot Number). All Batch traceability is required to be entered into the P2P Ship-To Module in support of this Purchase Order Line Item. (Enter \"N/A\" in the field that does not apply.)\n\nEach shipment must be supplied from the same lot, batch or heat treat lot. The supplier shall maintain records to identify which raw material lot each shipment is from."]
["1LM-TR-121","Date Code limit one year","All parts or material supplied on this Purchase Order shall have a manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture that is within 1 year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture older than 1 year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware.\n\nThe Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","MFC-PR-038","All Electrical, Electronic, Electromechanical Components (EEE) parts or material supplied must have a manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture that is within one (1) year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture older than one (1) year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware."]
["1LM-TR-122","Date Code limit two years","All parts or material supplied on this Purchase Order shall have a manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture that is within 2 year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture older than 2 year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware.\n\nThe Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-124","Date Code Limit Four years","All parts or material supplied on this Purchase Order shall have a manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture that is within 4 year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture older than 4 year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware.\n\nThe Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","MFC-PR-037","All Electrical, Electronic, Electromechanical Components (EEE) parts or material supplied must have a manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture that is within four (4) years of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture older than four (4) years' documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware."]
["1LM-TR-125","Date Code Limit Five Years","All parts or material supplied on this Purchase Order shall have a manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture that is within 5 year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture older than 5 year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware.\n\nThe Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","MFC-PR-029","All Electrical, Electronic, Electromechanical Components (EEE) parts or material supplied must have a manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture that is within five (5) years of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot date code or date of manufacture older than five (5) years' documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware."]
["1LM-TR-126","Date Code Limit Six Years","All parts or material supplied on this Purchase Order shall have a manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture that is within 6 year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture older than 6 year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware.\n\nThe Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","MFC-PR-031","All material supplied must have a lot/date code and/or Date of Manufacture (DOM) that is within six (6) years of the receipt by the Buyer. When material or package does not contain this information, documentation shall be provided showing evidence of the DOM."]
["1LM-TR-127","Date Code Limit Seven Years","All parts or material supplied on this Purchase Order shall have a manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture that is within 7 year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture older than 7 year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware.\n\nThe Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-130","Date Code Limit Ten Years","All parts or material supplied on this Purchase Order shall have a manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture that is within 10 year of receipt by Buyer. Manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture must be indicated on either parts / material or documentation provided and marked or labeled as such. Parts or material with manufactured lot number / date code or date of manufacture older than 10 year's documents shall be reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Representative prior to shipping of deliverable hardware.\n\nThe Seller shall upload the lot number / date code in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple lot numbers / date codes, each lot number / date code shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-201","Control of Shelf Life or Perishable Materials","Shipment Shall contain OEM Documentation defining shelf life requirements below\n\nSeller shall identify the outer shipping container, packing slip, and all unit packages with the shelf life requirements such as:\n- \"Shelf Life Material\" or \"Perishable Material\"\n- Storage Limitations (e.g.; maximum/minimum storage environments such as temperature, humidity, etc.).\n- Expiration date\n- Date representing beginning of Shelf life\n\nMaterials with unlimited shelf life shall be marked as 'Unlimited'.\n\nThe order of precedence for determination of requirements follows:\nPurchase Order\nBuyer's specification\nMIL/Federal specification\nManufacturer's specification/recommendation for shelf life\n\nAt least 70% of the shelf life shall remain at the time of receipt for items with a designated shelf life of over six months. At least 80% of the shelf life shall remain at the time of receipt for items with a designated shelf life of six (6) months or less.","MFC-PR-020","Seller shall identify the outer shipping container, packing slip, and all unit packages with:\n- “Shelf Life Material” or “Perishable Material”\n- Applicable shelf life\n- Expiration date by month and year\n- Date of manufacture\n- Storage limitations (e.g.; maximum/minimum storage environments).\n\nMaterials with unlimited shelf life shall be marked as “None Required”.\n\nThe order of precedence for determination of requirements follows: Purchase Order; Buyer’s specification; MIL/Federal specification; manufacturer's specification/recommendation for shelf life.\n\nAt least 70% of the shelf life shall remain at the time of receipt for items with a designated shelf life of over six months. At least 80% of the shelf life shall remain at the time of receipt for items with a designated shelf life of six (6) months or less.\n"]
["1LM-TR-202","Expiration Date Required","The Seller shall upload the expiration date in the Apriso Supplier Portal. If a shipment contains material from multiple expiration dates, each date shall be uploaded into the system on it's own Apriso inspection order. ","",0]
["1LM-TR-203","Shelf Life Control for Seller Managed","The Seller shall not exceed the Manufacturer's shelf life requirements for age, temperature, or other specified storage limitations for sensitive chemicals or components consumed in the manufacturing of the Buyer's products.\n\nThe Seller is prohibited from establishing alternative processes intended to deviate from the Manufacturer's prescribed shelf life requirements. Recertification testing of expired chemicals may be performed IAW Manufacturer's specifications.","MFC-PR-011","The Seller shall not exceed the Manufacturer’s shelf life requirements for age and temperature sensitive chemicals consumed in the manufacturing of the Buyer’s products.\n\nThe Seller is prohibited from establishing alternative processes intended to deviate from the Manufacturer’s prescribed shelf life requirements.  Recertification testing of expired chemicals may be performed IAW Manufacturer’s specifications."]
["1LM-TR-204","Control of Time and Temperature Sensitive Material","Time and temperature storage conditions must be attached to the packing sheet and accompany each shipment to be delivered hereunder. The outer most shipping box must be marked to indicate \"Time and Temperature Sensitive Material\" next to the shipping label. The time and temperature sensitive label text font size must be minimum one inch high, not to exceed six inches high.\n\nNote: If packaging dimensions do not allow for minimum one-inch text, apply largest text possible.","",0]
["1LM-TR-301","Certificate of Conformance - Standard","Seller shall submit a signed/stamped (electronic or physical) and dated Certificate of Conformance (C of C) with each shipment electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment.\n\nFor Buyer Part Numbers, Vendor Item Control, or Source Control Drawings, C of C shall identify at a minimum: \n1. Manufacturer's name  \n2. Manufacturer’s Address, Cage Code, or DUNS \n3. Buyer Purchase Order (PO) and Line Item number  \n4. Material quantity \n5. Buyer drawing number and Revision \n6. Buyer parts list revision when parts list is specified on Buyer drawings or defined in the PO. \n7. Seller part number and revision when specified as part of the Buyer drawing requirements \n8. Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number) \n9. Other C of C Requirements identified on the PO\n\nFor Seller Part Numbers, C of C shall identify at a minimum: \n1. Seller's name  \n2. Manufacturer’s Address, Cage Code, or DUNS \n3. Buyer PO and Line Item number \n4. Material quantity \n5. Seller part number \n6. Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number)\n\nFor Special Processes Used to Produce Purchased Part by Buyer, C of C shall identify at a minimum: \n1. Special processor's name  \n2. Special processor's Address, Cage Code, or DUNS \n3. Date special process performed \n4. Material number special process performed on\n5. Material quantity special process performed on \n6. Material process specification & revision number\n7. Indication that special process was performed in accordance with stated specification \n8. Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number)\n\nNote: AS9163 may be used as guidance for completion of compliant C of Cs. For Buyer Vendor Item Control or Source Control Drawings, Seller shall certify to the part number specified on the PO.  ","MFC-DC-003","Seller shall submit a signed/stamped and dated Certificate of Conformance (C of C) with each shipment electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment.\n\nNote: For Buyer Vendor Item Control or Source Control Drawings, Seller shall certify to the part number specified on the Purchase Order.\n\nFor Buyer Part Numbers, Vendor Item Control, or Source Control Drawings, C of C shall identify at a minimum:\n1.Manufacturer's name\n2.Buyer Purchase Order and Line Item number\n3.Material quantity\n4.Buyer drawing number and Revision\n5.Buyer parts list revision when parts list is specified on Buyer drawings or defined in the Purchase Order\n6.Seller part number and revision when specified as part of the Buyer drawing requirements\n7.Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number)\n\nFor Seller Part Numbers, C of C shall identify at a minimum:\n1.Seller's name\n2.Buyer Purchase Order number\n3.Material quantity\n4.Seller part number\n5.Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. Date/lot code, serial number, production lot number)\n\nFor Special Processes Used to Produce Purchased Part by Buyer, C of C shall identify at a minimum:\n1.Special processor's name\n2.Special processor's Address, Cage Code, or DUNS\n3.Date special process performed\n4.Material number special process performed on\n5.Material quantity special process performed on\n6.Indication that special process was performed in accordance with stated specification\n7.Signed/stamped and date of special process completion by Special Processor\n8.Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number)"]
["1LM-TR-302","Certificate of Conformance - Hard Copy","Seller shall submit a signed/stamped (physical) and dated Certificate of Conformance (C of C) with each shipment.\n\nFor Buyer Part Numbers, Vendor Item Control, or Source Control Drawings, C of C shall identify at a minimum: \n1. Manufacturer's name  \n2. Manufacturer’s Address, Cage Code, or DUNS \n3. Buyer Purchase Order (PO) and Line Item number  \n4. Material quantity \n5. Buyer drawing number and Revision \n6. Buyer parts list revision when parts list is specified on Buyer drawings or defined in the PO. \n7. Seller part number and revision when specified as part of the Buyer drawing requirements \n8. Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number) \n9. Other C of C Requirements identified on the PO\n\nFor Seller Part Numbers, C of C shall identify at a minimum: \n1. Seller's name  \n2. Manufacturer’s Address, Cage Code, or DUNS \n3. Buyer PO and Line Item number \n4. Material quantity \n5. Seller part number \n6. Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number)\n\nFor Special Processes Used to Produce Purchased Part by Buyer, C of C shall identify at a minimum: \n1. Special processor's name  \n2. Special processor's Address, Cage Code, or DUNS \n3. Date special process performed \n4. Material number special process performed on\n5. Material quantity special process performed on \n6. Material process specification & revision number\n7. Indication that special process was performed in accordance with stated specification \n8. Traceability Data (if applicable) (i.e. serial number, date code, production lot number)\n\nNote: AS9163 may be used as guidance for completion of compliant C of Cs. For Buyer Vendor Item Control or Source Control Drawings, Seller shall certify to the part number specified on the PO.  ","",0]
["1LM-TR-310","Certificate of Calibration Data Submittal Requirement ","The Seller is required to submit a Certificate of Calibration electronically on the recalibrated items being returned; which is to be reviewed prior to shipment of the item back to Buyer. The Certificate of Calibration shall be submitted through the Apriso Supplier Portal. Additionally, a hard copy of the Certificate of Calibration shall accompany the part(s) with the return shipment.\n\nThe Certificate of Calibration shall include, but is not limited to, the following:\n1. Title \"Certificate of Calibration\"\n2. Unique identification number for the Certificate of Calibration\n3. Page count with total number of pages\n4. Lockheed Martin Part Number\n5. Description of part being calibrated\n6. OEM Part or Model Number\n7. Serial Number\n8. Revision Level\n9. Quantity\n10. Calibration Technician name and ID (if applicable)\n11. Date, signature and title of the supplier's representative(s) approving the Certificate of Calibration\n12. Date calibrated\n13. Date next due calibration\n14. Calibration Interval\n15. Calibration Procedure Number / Revision / Description\n16. \"As Received\" condition and \"As shipped\" condition \n17. Name and address of the laboratory where the tests / calibrations were carried out\n18. Name and address of the customer\n19. Conditions (environment) under which the calibrations were made\n\nA calibration label shall be affixed to each unit in shipment or labeled as specified by the controlling documentation for each unit in the shipment. The calibration label, at a minimum, shall contain the following information:\n1. Calibration company name and ID\n2. Calibrated item part number\n3. Calibrated item serial number\n4. Date calibrated\n5. Calibration next due","",0]
["1LM-TR-401","Identification of Manufacturer on Packaging","The cage code of the manufacturer of the product supplied shall be recorded on the packing list and/or on the smallest unit container and/or the outer shipping container; the cage code of the headquarters or main plant for the original equipment manufacturer/original component manufacturer is acceptable for commercial product. If the cage code is not available then the name and address of the manufacturer shall be provided. The Seller is responsible for meeting this requirement and shall flow this requirement to its sources of supply.\n\nThis requirement is in addition to other packaging requirements identified on the face of the purchase order.\n\nThe commercial and government entity (cage) code of manufacturers are assigned and maintained by the defense logistics agency and can be found at:  https://cage.dla.mil","",0]
["1LM-TR-411","Government Qualified Products Lists","Item(s) must be supplied from an approved source listed on the Government Qualified Products List (QPL). Qualification must be in accordance with the cited specifications/standards. The source or this item must be certified and QPL approved at time of contract award.","",0]
["1LM-TR-412","Program Approved Parts List (PAPL)database","Parts/Materials are in the Parts, Materials and Processes (PMP) and/or the Program Approved Parts List (PAPL) database.","",0]
["1LM-TS-001","Acceptance Test Procedure - Buyer Approval","Seller shall obtain Buyer's review and approval of its acceptance test procedures (ATP), (i.e. test program, electrical, and screening), prior to conducting tests on items to be delivered under this order.\n\na. If, due to type of software or test routines involved, it is necessary for Buyer to perform this review at Seller's facility, Seller shall so notify Buyer of this requirement and of test program availability thirty (30) days prior to start of testing.\nb. If the ATP program plan and procedures can be transmitted to the Buyer for review, the ATP shall be submitted at least thirty (30) days prior to start of testing. Seller shall submit a copy of the ATP used for test, or a certificate indicating the revision of the ATP used for testing, with the shipment.","MFC-DC-006","Seller shall prepare separate detailed test procedures, encompassing tests required for in-process (when required) and final acceptance.  Each item of hardware, or part thereof, which requires acceptance testing, shall be covered by an Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP).\n\nFinal and in-process acceptance test procedures require Buyer approval prior to the delivery of the first unit of hardware. Subsequent changes or modifications shall be approved by Buyer prior to incorporation.  Where these tests are performed utilizing equipment controlled by computer software or firmware, the software or firmware associated with, or affecting, those tests require Buyer approval at the same time(s) as the remainder of the acceptance test procedure.3"]
["1LM-TS-003","Printed Wire Board (PWB) Deliver Microsections and Test Coupons","All mounts used for Group A Inspections and any remaining part of the coupon that has not been micro sectioned must be included in the shipment and will be stored at Lockheed Martin (LM). Mounts/coupons must be bagged separately from the PWB, but may be attached to the PWB bag. Mounts/coupons are subject to verification by LM prior to final hardware acceptance.","",0]
["1LM-TS-004","Raw Material Test Reports","Seller shall include with each shipment the raw material manufacturer's test report (e.g., mill test report) that states that the lot of material furnished has been tested, inspected, and found to be in compliance with the applicable material specifications.\n\nThe Manufacturer’s test report shall include the following information (as applicable) based on the product being shipped:\nA. Raw material manufacturer’s name and/or cage code\nB. Specifications with revision or letters\nC. Traceability such as Batch, Heat or Lot number\nD. Date of manufacture\nE. Chemical analysis with actual test values\nF. Physical analysis (Tensile, shear, hardness, etc.) with actual test values\nG. Verification of special processes per the drawing requirements. (i.e. heat treat, NDI, passivation, coatings, finishes, etc.)\nH. Temper or grade\nI.  Dimensional measurements\n\nFor aluminum mill products (except castings), certifications for chemistry may indicate compliance within the allowed range. When organization supplies converted material produced by a raw material manufacturer, the organization shall submit all pre and post conversion chemical/physical tests reports. A test report is permitted to indicate conformance through a certification statement when the specification/drawing requires inspection for dimensional tolerances ONLY for metallic raw stock (such as sheet, plate, bar, rod, or other forms). In addition to actual test reports, the suppliers certification statement signifies the material being delivered conforms to the specification or contract with regards to all qualitative attributes  such as, but not limited to, workmanship, material, appearance, color, quality, visual, method of construction, packaging, preparation for delivery, labeling, or marking.\n\nFor Plastics and other non-metallic materials, the raw material manufacturer’s C of C  would include the Raw material manufacturer’s name and/or cage code, Specifications with revision or letters, Traceability such as Batch or Lot number, Date of manufacture, and Dimensional measurements. ","MFC-DC-009","A Manufacturer’s test report shall be submitted to the Buyer. The Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment.\n\nRefer to http://www.myexostar.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=315\n\nThe Manufacturer’s test report shall include the following information (as applicable) based on the product being shipped:\n \nA. Manufacturer’s name\nB. Part number with revision & specification\nC. Traceability such as Batch, Heat or Lot number\nD. Date of manufacture\nE. Chemical analysis with actual test values\nF. Tensile, shear, hardness with actual test values (as applicable)\nG. Verification of special processes per the drawing requirements. (i.e. heat treat, NDI, passivation, coatings, finishes, etc.)\nH. Temper or grade\n \nIf the Seller is not the Manufacturer, the Seller may provide a photocopy of the original Manufacturer's test report.\n"]
["1LM-TS-005","Acceptance Test Report","The Seller shall electronically deliver a test report to the agreed upon Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP). If there is not an agreed upon ATP, the seller shall use their standard ATP for this part. The report shall include actual test and/or inspection values obtained when the ATP specifies limits for chemical, mechanical, electrical, physical, or other properties. This report shall be validated by an authorized Seller Quality Representative through the application of an inspection stamp, a signature and title, or electronic approval method.\n\nThe report shall include the following data elements at a minimum: \nSeller/Manufacturer Name\nSeller/Manufacturer Address\nPart Number\nSerial Number(s)/Lot Number(s) (as applicable)\nRun Time (as applicable)\nTest Procedure Rev (as applicable)\nTest(s) Conducted\nActual Results of Test(s) \nElectronic Signature, Inspection Stamp, or Physical Signature\nDate(s) of Test(s)\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal","MFC-DC-018","Seller shall provide functional test reports of items to be delivered under this contract to the Buyer’s Quality Representative for review.\n\nReports shall contain:\n\nSeller/Manufacturer Name\nSeller/Manufacturer Address\nPart Number\nSerial Number(s)/Lot Number(s) (as applicable)\nRun Time (as applicable)\nTest Procedure Rev (as applicable)\nTest(s) Conducted\nActual Results of Test(s)\nApproval Signature or Stamp from Seller/Manufacturer Representative\nDate(s) of Test(s)\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment."]
["1LM-TS-006","Electrical Testing of Printed Wiring Boards (PWB)","Electrical Testing shall be performed in accordance with the Purchase Order and the Master Printed Wiring Board Drawing.\n\nA copy of the electrical test report shall be included in the build documentation establishing test parameters and results. The report shall ensure traceability to the lot under test.\n\nThe following methods in accordance with IPC-9252 may be utilized on Class 3 boards: Indirect isolation testing by signature comparison may be utilized provided the boards are rigid only in type and contain solid ground planes (split planes are not acceptable).\nAdjacency may be utilized for isolation testing under the following conditions:\n1) The distance shall be set at a minimum of 7.62 millimeters (0.300 inch) unless the design minimum conductor spacing is greater than 1.524 millimeters (0.060 inch) then it shall be set at a minimum of 5 times the minimum conductor spacing.\n2) PWBs shall be tested to an electrical test programmed from the furnished IPC-D-356 netlist.  When the Buyer furnishes gerber data without furnishing a netlist test file; the Seller shall extract a test file from the original gerber data.\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using Apriso Supplier Portal prior to each shipment.","MFC-TS-005","Electrical Testing shall be performed in accordance with the Purchase Order and the Master Printed Wiring Board Drawing.\n \nA copy of the electrical test report shall be included in the build documentation establishing test parameters and results. The report shall ensure traceability to the lot under test.\n \nThe following methods in accordance with IPC-9252 may be utilized on Class 3 boards: Indirect isolation testing by signature comparison may be utilized provided the boards are rigid only in type and contain solid ground planes (split planes are not acceptable).\n \nAdjacency may be utilized for isolation testing under the following conditions:\n1) The distance shall be set at a minimum of 7.62 millimeters (0.300 inch) unless the design minimum conductor spacing is greater than 1.524 millimeters (0.060 inch) then it shall be set at a minimum of 5 times the minimum conductor spacing.\n \n2) PWBs shall be tested to an electrical test programmed from the furnished IPC-D-356 netlist.  When the Buyer furnishes gerber data without furnishing a netlist test file; the Seller shall extract a test file from the original gerber data.\n \nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to each shipment."]
["1LM-TS-007","Printed Wire Board (PWB) Retain Microsections and Test Coupons","Printed Wiring Board (PWB) coupons, including any board samples utilized in test or referee, shall be maintained by the Seller as objective evidence as to the acceptability of the contracted article(s) through procurement, fabrication, assembly and/or test. Coupons must be maintained for a minimum period of seven (7) years, or as otherwise stated elsewhere in this Purchase Order. ","MFC-PR-024","Printed Wiring Board (PWB) coupons, including any board samples utilized in test or referee, shall be maintained by the Seller as objective evidence as to the acceptability of the contracted article(s) through procurement, fabrication, assembly and/or test. Coupons must be maintained for a minimum period of seven (7) years, or as otherwise stated elsewhere in this Purchase Order. Seller will not change the status of retained records without written approval by Buyer."]
["1LM-TS-008","Ultrasonic Inspection Procedure Approval","Seller shall submit ultrasonic inspection procedures and/or technique data sheets to the Buyer's Procurement Representative for approval prior to shipping the first article. The Buyer shall obtain approval from the Lockheed Martin Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Level III. The technique sheet shall identify method of technique (conventional/digital).\n\nSeller shall notify the Buyer's Procurement Representative in writing and obtain approval when changes are made to the ultrasonic inspection procedure and/or technique data sheet.\n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment.","MFC-DC-019","Seller shall submit ultrasonic inspection procedures and/or technique data sheets to the Buyer’s Procurement Representative for approval prior to shipping the first article. The Buyer shall obtain approval from the Lockheed Martin Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Level III. The technique sheet shall identify method of technique (conventional / digital). Seller shall notify the Buyer’s Procurement Representative in writing and obtain approval when changes are made to the ultrasonic inspection procedure and/or technique data sheet. \n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment."]
["1LM-TS-010","Failure Analysis Report / Cannot Verify Failure Report ","The Seller shall electronically submit a Failure Analysis Report on the items being returned for repair/rework. The Failure Analysis Report shall be submitted through the Apriso Supplier Portal as a inspection order attachment. \n\nAt a minimum, the subject line of this submittal shall include the associated PO Number & Line Item Number. \n\nThe Failure Analysis Report shall include the following: \n\n1. Lockheed Martin return Purchase Order Number(s) & Line Item Number(s)\n\n2. Lockheed Martin Part Number(s) and Serial Number(s)\n\n3. If no fault is found, provide evaluation steps that were performed to reach this conclusion \n\n4. Describe the applicable repair activity and any applicable test actions performed \n\n5. Provide a list of the failed and/or significant parts replaced, including the part number(s) and description(s) \n\n6. As applicable, identify all software/firmware revisions configured on the unit \n\n7. As applicable, if during the repair activity you identify the cause of the failure, provide your summary of the cause of failure \n\n8. As appliable, any Lockheed Supplier Corrective Action Request numbers\n\n9. Date, signature/e-signature, address were work was performed, and title of the supplier's representative(s) approving the Failure Analysis Report \n\nIn the event that a repair cannot be performed without deviation from the established design, i.e.  Part-substitution, standard repair methods, the use of refurbished/remanufactured parts, etc. the Lockheed Martin buyer shall be notified prior the initiation of the repair.","MFC-DC-011","The Seller shall perform a failure analysis on item(s) returned under this contract and shall provide to the Buyer, as a minimum, the following information with the shipment or as directed by contract:\n(1)  Date of report\n(2)  Contract number\n(3)  Seller’s name and address\n(4)  Part name, number, revision level, serial number\n(5)  SCAR number (if specified by contract)\n(6)  Specific and contributory causes of failure\n(7)  Corrective action taken to preclude recurrence and effectivity by date or serial number of corrective action\n(8)  Signature and title of supplier’s quality representative approving the failure analysis report\n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment. Refer to http://www.myexostar.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=315."]
["1LM-TS-011","Cable and Wire Spark Test Report","SHIELDED AND JACKETED CABLES: All shielded and jacketed cables procured on this Purchase Order (PO) require spark test testing or equivalent test in accordance with ANSI/NEMA WC 27500 or the applicable specification as specified on the engineering drawing. Seller shall provide a copy of the manufacturer's spark test or equivalent test certification with each delivery. When product is removed from the manufacturer's original spool and re-spooled, the original spark test or equivalent test for the material removed shall be considered void and the material shall be re-tested. Care shall be taken to insure insulation integrity, make certain no sharp edges or other abrasive/cutting characteristics are present on the final spool or equipment used to process re-spooled cables prior to testing. In addition, Seller shall provide, upon request, detailed work instructions to ensure re-spooled cable is free from nicks, cuts, pinholes, twists and abrasions.\n\nJACKETED WIRES: Jacketed wire procured on this Purchase Order (PO) require spark test testing or equivalent test in accordance with SAE AS 22759 or the applicable specification as specified on the engineering drawing requirement. Seller shall provide a copy of the manufacturer's spark test or equivalent test certification with each delivery. When product is removed from the manufacturer's original spool and re-spooled, the original spark test or equivalent test for the material removed shall be considered void and the material shall be re-tested. Care shall be taken to insure insulation integrity, make certain no sharp edges or other abrasive/cutting characteristics are present on the final spool or equipment used to process re-spooled wire prior to testing. In addition, Seller shall provide upon request detailed work instructions to ensure re-spooled wire is free from nicks, cuts, pinholes, twists and abrasions.\n\nA copy of the spark test re-test certification containing the following shall be included with each shipment and retained on file with the Seller:\n1. Testing Facility Name\n2. PO/Line Item Number\n3. Customer Part Number\n4. Lot Number\n5. Quantity Re-tested\n6. Date Rested\n7. Testing Agent Signature / eSignature\n8. Testing Specification\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to each shipment.","MFC-TS-003","SHIELDED AND JACKETED CABLES:\nAll shielded and jacketed cables procured on this Purchase Order (PO) require spark test testing or equivalent test in accordance with ANSI/NEMA WC 27500 or the applicable specification as specified on the engineering drawing.  Seller shall provide a copy of the manufacturer's spark test or equivalent test certification with each delivery.  When product is removed from the manufacturer's original spool and re-spooled, the original spark test or equivalent test for the material removed shall be considered void and the material shall be re-tested.  Care shall be taken to insure insulation integrity, make certain no sharp edges or other abrasive/cutting characteristics are present on the final spool or equipment used to process re-spooled cables prior to testing.  In addition, Seller shall provide upon request detailed work instructions to ensure re-spooled cable is free from nicks, cuts, pinholes, twists and abrasions.\n \nJACKETED WIRES:\nJacketed wire procured on this Purchase Order (PO) require spark test testing or equivalent test in accordance with SAE AS 22759 or the applicable specification as specified on the engineering drawing requirement. Seller shall provide a copy of the manufacturer's spark test or equivalent test certification with each delivery.  When product is removed from the manufacturer's original spool and re-spooled, the original spark test or equivalent test for the material removed shall be considered void and the material shall be re-tested.  Care shall be taken to insure insulation integrity, make certain no sharp edges or other abrasive/cutting characteristics are present on the final spool or equipment used to process re-spooled wire prior to testing. In addition, Seller shall provide upon request detailed work instructions to ensure re-spooled wire is free from nicks, cuts, pinholes, twists and abrasions.\n \nA copy of the spark test re-test certification containing the following shall be included with each shipment and retained on file with the Seller:\n1. Testing Facility Name\n2. PO/Line Item Number\n3. Customer Part Number\n4. Lot Number\n5. Quantity Re-tested\n6. Date Rested\n7. Testing Agent Signature\n8. Testing Specification\n \nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to each shipment."]
["1LM-TS-012","Pressure Vessels Documentation","With each shipment of a pressure vessel, the Seller shall provide two copies of American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) code reports showing conformance of the units to the requirements of the pressure vessel code. The hardware markings must be in accordance with the applicable drawing/specification. The report shall indicate the methods used and the pressures used to test and certify the vessel. ","",0]
["1LM-TS-013","Non-Standard Electronic Piece Parts - Specification Variation ","Parts delivered to this purchase order shall comply with all part performance quality and reliability requirements in accordance with the device specification.\n\nUpon first shipment, a break in production greater than one year, or a shipment following a qualifying event (change to the design, manufacture, methods, tooling, facility location) the seller shall provide one or a combination of the following test reports:\nA) For parts where no data exists and testing is the only alternative, lot-specific test data per the device specification\nB) Actual test data from similar products by the same manufacturer using similar parts, materials, and processes with requirements equivalent to or better than the device specification\nC) Engineering analysis of historical data from similar (or more stringent) product applications\nD) Data supporting a documented failure-mechanism-driven reliability qualification program using JEDEC STD JESD34 (failure-mechanism-driven reliability qualification of silicon devices) guidelines.\n\nThis data shall be submitted with parts and shall not be considered proprietary to the Seller.","MFC-TR-004","Parts delivered to this purchase order shall comply with all part performance quality and reliability requirements in accordance with the device specification.  To demonstrate conformance, Seller shall provide with first shipment (and with any subsequent shipments when a change to the design, manufacture, methods, tooling, facility location or a break in production of (1 )year one of the following (or any combination thereof) to Buyer Quality Engineering for product acceptance: \n\nA) For parts where no data exists and testing is the only alternative, lot-specific test data per the device specification \n\nB) Actual test data from similar products by the same manufacturer using similar parts, materials and processes with requirements equivalent to or better than the device specification \n\nC) Engineering analysis of historical data from similar (or more stringent) product applications \n\nD) Data supporting a documented failure-mechanism-driven reliability qualification program using JEDEC STD JESD34 (failure-mechanism-driven reliability qualification of silicon devices) guidelines. \n\nThis data shall be submitted with parts and shall not be considered proprietary to the Seller."]
["1LM-TS-014","Qualification Test ","The Seller shall prepare and document a detailed qualification test procedure to assure conformance with qualification requirements. The procedure shall be sent to the Buyer Procurement Representative for the Buyer Quality Engineering review and approval prior to any qualification activities. Actual qualification test results shall be sent to the Buyer Procurement Representative for Buyer Quality Engineering review and approval prior to the delivery of the first unit of hardware.","MFC-DC-013","The Seller shall prepare and document a detailed qualification test procedure to assure conformance with qualification requirements. The procedure shall be sent to the Buyer Procurement Representative for the Buyer Quality Engineering review and approval prior to any qualification activities. Actual qualification test results shall be sent to the Buyer Procurement Representative for Buyer Quality Engineering review and approval prior to the delivery of the first unit of hardware."]
["1LM-TS-015","Screening / Lot Acceptance Test Summary Sheet","The seller shall submit a screening/lot acceptance test summary sheet with each lot of components as defined by the applicable specification.  \n\nThe seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to each shipment.","MFC-DC-022","Seller shall submit a screening/lot acceptance test summary sheet with each lot of components as defined by the applicable specification.  \n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to each shipment."]
["1LM-TS-016","100% PIND Screening ","Particle Impact Noise Detection (PIND) screening is required on 100% of parts. PIND screening shall be performed in accordance with MIL-STD-883 (method 2020 condition A), or MIL-STD-750 (method 2052 condition A), unless otherwise specified by the drawing.","MFC-IN-006","Particle Impact Noise Detection (PIND) screening is required on 100% of parts. PIND screening shall be performed in accordance with MIL-STD-883 (method 2020 condition A), or MIL-STD-750 (method 2052 condition A), unless otherwise specified by the drawing."]
["1LM-TS-017","Particle Impact Noise Detection (PIND)","  PARTICLE IMPACT NOISE DETECTION (PIND)\n                            OR\n              X-RAY MSRI INSPECTION (SEE NOTE 1)\n----------------------------------------------------------------\n  PIND testing is required for metal can and ceramic packaged devices with metal lids without getter material.\n----------------------------------------------------------------\n  PIND testing is not required for devices when the manufacturers have an \"in-line PIND process monitor\" which has been reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Component Assessment Group (CAG) or the device has getter material inside of the package cavity.\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n                     TYPICAL TEST METHODS\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n  DEVICE TYPE        |       PIND                |  X-RAY\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n       I.C.          |       MIL-STD-883         | MIL-STD-883\n  (MIL-PRF-38535)    | METHOD 2020, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2012\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n      HYBRID         |       MIL-STD-883         | MIL-STD-883\n  (MIL-PRF-38534)    | METHOD 2020, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2012\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n    OSCILLATORS      |       MIL-STD-883         | MIL-STD-883\n    &  CRYSTAL       | METHOD 2020, TEST COND B  | METHOD 2012\n  (MIL-PRF-55310)    |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n  SOLID STATE        | PER DEVICE SPECIFICATION  | MIL-STD-750\n     RELAYS          |  1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN      | METHOD 2076\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n      DIODES         |       MIL-STD-750         | MIL-STD-750\n  (MIL-PRF-19500)    | METHOD 2052, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2076\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n    TRANSITORS       |       MIL-STD-750         | MIL-STD-750\n  (MIL-PRF-19500)    | METHOD 2052, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2076\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n    THYRISTORS       |       MIL-STD-750         | MIL-STD-750\n  (MIL-PRF-19500)    | METHOD 2052, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2076\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n\nNotes:\n1. X-ray in lieu of PIND testing can be performed for special types of cavity devices that are not recommended for PIND due to noise sensitivity and/or construction concerns (i.e. crystal oscillator) where approved by the Buyer’s Quality Component Assessment Group (CAG).\n2. A copy of the test results shall accompany each shipment of devices requiring PIND or x-ray testing.\n3. Sample size testing requires that a sample group size of 45 devices shall be tested. It should be noted that sample testing requires that all of the devices shall have same part number, same date code and from the same manufacturer. If the number of devices is less than 45, then the sample size shall be 100% of the devices.\n4. If a sample tested inspection lot fails the PIND or x-ray testing, the entire lot is to be 100 percent tested. The Buyer’s Quality Component Assessment Group (CAG) shall be notified (submit the noncompliance to the Buyer) if the failure rate exceeds 20%. All devices failing PIND testing at an independent test lab shall be purged from the lot and packaged in a separate container and returned to the Buyer’s Receiving Inspection.\n5. All technical questions related to the generation and/or submittal of the above described testing shall be directed to the Buyer.\n6. All contractual direction including approval/disapproval of test plans and/or reports submitted in support of this Purchase Order will be provided by the Buyer.\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to each shipment.","MFC-TS-006","  PARTICLE IMPACT NOISE DETECTION (PIND)\n                            OR\n              X-RAY MSRI INSPECTION (SEE NOTE 1)\n----------------------------------------------------------------\n  PIND testing is required for metal can and ceramic packaged\n  devices with metal lids without getter material.\n----------------------------------------------------------------\n  PIND testing is not required for devices when the\n  manufacturers have an \"in-line PIND process monitor\" which has\n  been reviewed and approved by Buyer's Quality Component\n  Assessment Group (CAG) or the device has getter material\n  inside of the package cavity.\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n                     TYPICAL TEST METHODS\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n  DEVICE TYPE        |       PIND                |  X-RAY\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n       I.C.          |       MIL-STD-883         | MIL-STD-883\n  (MIL-PRF-38535)    | METHOD 2020, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2012\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n      HYBRID         |       MIL-STD-883         | MIL-STD-883\n  (MIL-PRF-38534)    | METHOD 2020, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2012\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n    OSCILLATORS      |       MIL-STD-883         | MIL-STD-883\n    &  CRYSTAL       | METHOD 2020, TEST COND B  | METHOD 2012\n  (MIL-PRF-55310)    |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n  SOLID STATE        | PER DEVICE SPECIFICATION  | MIL-STD-750\n     RELAYS          |  1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN      | METHOD 2076\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n      DIODES         |       MIL-STD-750         | MIL-STD-750\n  (MIL-PRF-19500)    | METHOD 2052, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2076\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n    TRANSITORS       |       MIL-STD-750         | MIL-STD-750\n  (MIL-PRF-19500)    | METHOD 2052, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2076\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\n    THYRISTORS       |       MIL-STD-750         | MIL-STD-750\n  (MIL-PRF-19500)    | METHOD 2052, TEST COND A  | METHOD 2076\n                     |   1 TEST CYCLE OR RUN     |\n---------------------------------------------------------------\nNotes:\n1. X-ray in lieu of PIND testing can be performed for special types of cavity devices that are not recommended for PIND due to noise sensitivity and/or construction concerns (i.e. crystal oscillator) where approved by the Buyer’s Quality Component Assessment Group (CAG).\n\n2. A copy of the test results shall accompany each shipment of devices requiring PIND or x-ray testing.\n\n3. Sample size testing requires that a sample group size of 45 devices shall be tested. It should be noted that sample testing requires that all of the devices shall have same part number, same date code and from the same manufacturer. If the number of devices is less than 45, then the sample size shall be 100% of the devices.\n\n4. If a sample tested inspection lot fails the PIND or x-ray testing, the entire lot is to be 100 percent tested. The Buyer’s Quality Component Assessment Group (CAG) shall be notified (submit the noncompliance to the Buyer's Procurement Representative) if the failure rate exceeds 20%. All devices failing PIND testing at an independent test lab shall be purged from the lot and packaged in a separate container and returned to the Buyer’s Receiving Inspection.\n\n5. All technical questions related to the generation and/or submittal of the above described testing shall be directed to the Buyer's Procurement Representative.\n\n6. All contractual direction including approval/disapproval of test plans and/or reports submitted in support of this Purchase Order will be provided by the Buyer.\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P Ship-To module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to each shipment."]
["1LM-TS-018","Electrical Test Data","Electrical test data shall consist of providing a copy of the manufacturer’s \"final electrical test data\" or \"Military Group A test data\" in accordance with the data requirement indicated below:\n\n1.  The seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal.\n\n2.  The test data shall record the information noted below as a minimum for each receiving lot:\n        a. Quantity received from manufacturer.\n        b. Part type (description).\n        c. Manufacturer’s part number.\n        d. Lot date code.\n        e. Serial numbers (if applicable) \n        f.  Number of devices subjected to each test.\n        g. Actual results of the tests. \n        h. Number of devices passing each test.\n        i.  Number of compliant and non-compliant devices in the lot.\n        j.  Approval stamp or signature of the manufacturer’s representative.\n\n3.  All tests shall be performed in accordance with the latest revision of the applicable component specification or military specification.\n\n4.   Ten (10) percent defective allowed (PDA). No more than ten (10) percent of parts can fail testing. For inspection lots containing more than one date code, the PDA shall be against each inspection lot date code. ","MFC-DC-014","Electrical data test requirements:\n\nElectrical test data shall consist of providing a copy of the manufacturer’s \"final electrical test data\" or \"Military Group A test\ndata\" in accordance with the data requirement indicated below:\n\n1.  A copy of the Manufacturer’s final electrical test data or Group A test data must accompany each shipment of devices. The Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the P2P ship to module via Exostar (https://portal.exostar.com) prior to shipment. Refer to http://www.myexostar.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=315.\n \n 2.  The test data shall record the information noted below as a minimum for each receiving lot:\n        a. Quantity received from manufacturer.\n        b. Part type (description).\n        c. Manufacturer’s part number.\n        d. Lot date code.\n        e. Serial numbers (if applicable) \n        f.  Number of devices subjected to each test.\n        g. Actual results of the tests. \n        h. Number of devices passing each test.\n        i.  Number of compliant and non-compliant devices in the lot.\n        j.  Approval stamp or signature of the manufacturer’s representative.\n \n3.  All tests shall be performed in accordance with the latest revision of the applicable component specification or military specification. \n\n4.  10 percent defective allowed (PDA). No more than 10 percent of parts can fail testing. For inspection lots containing more than one date code, the PDA shall be against each inspection lot date code.\n \n5.  All technical questions related to the generation and/or submittal of the above described testing shall be directed to the attention of the Buyer.\n \n6.  All contractual direction including approval/disapproval of the electrical test data submitted in support of this purchase order will be provided by the buyer (procurement department).\n"]
["1LM-TS-019","Group A Electrical Testing ","Electrical test requirements:  Electrical tests shall consist of performing \"final electrical testing\" in accordance with the requirements indicated below:\n1. Unless otherwise specified on the Purchase Order (PO), all tests shall be performed in accordance with the latest revision of the applicable component specification or military specification.\n\n2. Prior to the start of any electrical testing, an incoming external visual shall be performed to verify that the devices sustained no shipping damage.\n\n3. 100% of the devices will be subjected to final electrical testing or military group A testing at an independent test facility. If electrical testing cannot be performed by a buyer approved independent test lab and can only be performed at the manufacturer, justification for the exception shall be submitted to and approved by the Buyer. Test and process data must be representative of part number, specific lot date code, and the device test plan.\n\n4. Test sequence, test parameters, and test program shall be approved by the Buyer prior to initiation of device electrical testing.  The receiving lot shall be subjected to 100% electrical testing.  The test data shall record the lot and test data information noted below as a minimum for each receiving lot.\n A.  Lot information\n      a.  Customer name & Purchase Order number.\n      b.  Quantity received from Seller.\n      c.  Part type (description).\n      d.  Customer & Manufacturers part number.\n      e.  Lot date codes.\n B.  Test data\n      a.  Date of testing.\n      b.  Electrical tests, limits and conditions (reference test software & equipment).\n      c.  Number of devices subjected to each test.\n      d.  Number of devices passing each test.\n      e.  Number of compliant and non-compliant devices in the lot.\n      f.  Disposition of all failed devices.\n      g.  Independent QA verification of test results.\n\n5. Five percent (5%) defective PDA (Percent Defectives Allowable) calculation:  Any inspection lots with more than 5% of the devices failing electrical parameter testing shall be considered to be a failed lot and the Buyer shall be notified within 48 hours. The PDA shall be calculated across all electrical tests performed for each inspection lot.\n  A.  For inspection lots containing more than one date code, the PDA shall be calculated against each date code.\n  B.  The test records shall include an entry for the calculated PDA.","MFC-TS-008","Electrical test requirements:  Electrical tests shall consist of performing \"final electrical testing\" in accordance with the requirements indicated below:\n\n1. Unless otherwise specified on the Purchase Order (PO), all tests shall be performed in accordance with the latest revision of the applicable component specification or military specification.\n\n2. Prior to the start of any electrical testing, an incoming external visual shall be performed to verify that the devices sustained no shipping damage.\n\n3. 100 percent of the devices will be subjected to final electrical testing or military group A testing at an independent test facility.  If electrical testing cannot be performed by a buyer approved independent test lab and can only be performed at the manufacturer, justification for the exception shall be submitted (submit to the Buyer of record on the PO) and approved by the Buyer's Component Assessment Group (CAG).  Test and process data must be representative of part number, specific lot date code and the device test plan.\n\n4. Test sequence, test parameters, and test program shall be approved by the Buyer's Components Assessment Group (CAG) prior to initiation of device electrical testing.  The receiving lot shall be subjected to 100% electrical testing.  The test data shall record the lot and test data information noted below as a minimum for each receiving lot.\n\n A.  Lot information\n      a.  Customer name & Purchase Order number.\n      b.  Quantity received from Seller.\n      c.  Part type (description).\n      d.  Customer & Manufacturers part number.\n      e.  Lot date codes.\n\n B.  Test data\n      a.  Date of testing.\n      b.  Electrical tests, limits and conditions (reference\n            test software & equipment).\n      c.  Number of devices subjected to each test.\n      d.  Number of devices passing each test.\n      e.  Number of compliant and non-compliant devices in the\n            lot.\n      f.  Disposition of all failed devices.\n      g.  Independent QA verification of test results.\n\n5. Five percent (5%) defective PDA (Percent Defectives Allowable) calculation:  Any inspection lots with more than 5% of the devices failing electrical parameter testing shall be considered to be a failed lot and the   Buyer's CAG shall be notified (submit the noncompliance to the Buyer of record on the PO) within 48 hours. The PDA shall be calculated across all electrical tests performed for each inspection lot.\n\n  A.  For inspection lots containing more than one date code,\n        the PDA shall be calculated against each date code.\n  B.  The test records shall include an entry for the calculated PDA.\n\n6. All technical questions related to the generation and/or submittal of the above described testing shall be directed to the attention of the Buyer of record on the PO.\n\n7. All contractual direction including approval/disapproval of test plans and/or reports submitted in support of this PO will be provided by the Buyer.\n"]
["1LM-TS-020","Group B Acceptance Testing ","Environmental test or qualification test results shall list all parameters tested and actual readings taken during these tests.  The Group B test requirement may be satisfied with test data which is an established part of the contractor's system so long as the data demonstrates satisfactory performance of the inspection lot from which all parts are shipped. This data shall accompany each shipment.\n\nSeller's quality representative shall validate the test report and sign with either an electronic signature, physical signature, or stamp.","MFC-TS-009","Environmental test or qualification test results shall list all parameters tested and actual readings taken during these tests.  The Group B test requirement may be satisfied with test data which is an established part of the contractor's system so long as the data demonstrates satisfactory performance of the inspection lot from which all parts are shipped.  This data shall accompany each shipment.\n\nData (reports) shall be validated by an authorized contractor's representative, by either an inspection stamp or signature and title. "]
["1LM-TS-101","Solderability Testing - Seller Performed","Solderability testing shall be performed by the Seller (or by a capable test facility of the Seller's choice). Testing shall be performed using the latest revision of J standards available at the execution of this Purchase Order.\n\nDevices utilized for Solderability testing shall be segregated from the lot and not be delivered to the Buyer. \n\nSeller shall include test report for solderability testing with each shipment which states that testing has been performed and result is acceptable. This test report shall include:\n1. Buyer Purchase Order and Line Item Number\n2. Part Number(s)\n3. Date Code(s) and/or Lot Number(s)\n4. Quantity Tested\n5. Specify Pre-condition Type and Exposure Parameter\n6. Name of the Testing Facility if different from the Manufacturer\n7. Testing Date\n8. Signature and Title of an Authorized Seller's Representative \n\nIf solderability test report is in the form of electronic certifications, then signature is not required.\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the 1LM Inspection System prior to shipment.\nNOTE: Seller shall contact the Buyer should the material fail solderability testing.\n\n1. For Printed Wiring Boards (PWBs): \nTesting shall be performed using the latest revision of J standards available at the execution of this Purchase Order. \nSolderability test shall comply with J-STD-003, Class 3, Category 3, unless otherwise specified in the governing purchasing document/drawing. Solder float test is the preferred method. Test samples shall comply with the fabrication specification of Printed Wiring Boards. \nAn acceptable solderability test result shall be within six (6) months of the date of delivery to the Buyer from either the Original Component Manufacturer (OCM), the Seller, or by a capable test facility of the Seller's choice. \n\n2. For Components, Lugs, Terminals, Wires and Shields:\nTesting shall be performed using the latest revision of J standards available at the execution of this Purchase Order.\nTest in accordance with J-STD-002 unless otherwise specified in governing purchasing document (i.e.: Source Control Drawing, Altered Item Drawing, Buyer's drawing, or Mil-Specification). \nAn acceptable solderability test result shall be within two (2) years of the date of delivery to the Buyer from either the Original Component Manufacturer (OCM), the Seller, or by a capable test facility of the Seller's choice.\nWires and Shields shall be tested per J-STD-002, preceded by one (1) hour of steam exposure. When testing shields, the component wires of the cable may be left in place.\nComponents, Lugs, and Terminals shall be tested per J-STD-002, preceded by pre-conditioning Category C (after eight (8) hours of steam exposure for tin and tin alloy finishes) or pre-conditioning Category A (after one (1) hour for non-tin or non-tin alloy finishes). A minimum of two (2) pieces from each deliverable Lot or Date Code shall be tested. (ex. Electrical components with date code 2201A, 2201B, 2201-CB are still considered D/C 2201).\n\nIn lieu of solderability testing, the Original Component Manufacturer (OCM) may perform Tin/Lead (Sn/Pb) hot solder dip processing within four (4) years of the date of delivery to the Buyer. OCM certification shall be included with each shipment, which states that hot solder dip has been performed and is acceptable. This certification shall include:\n1. Buyer Purchase Order and Line Item Number\n2. Part Number(s)\n3. Original Date Code(s) and/or Lot Number(s)\n4. Quantity\n5. Date of hot solder dip\n6. Date Code(s) after hot solder dip (if applicable)\n7. Signature and Title of OCM Representative","MFC-TS-001","Solderability testing shall be performed by the Seller (or by a capable test facility of the Seller's choice). Testing shall be performed using the latest revision of J standards available at the execution of this Purchase Order.\n\nDevices utilized for Solderability testing shall be segregated from the lot and not be delivered to the Buyer.\n\nSeller shall include test report for solderability testing with each shipment which states that testing has been performed and result is acceptable. This test report shall include:\n1. Buyer Purchase Order and Line Item Number\n2. Part Number(s)\n3. Date Code(s) and/or Lot Number(s)\n4. Quantity Tested\n5. Specify Pre-condition Type and Exposure Parameter\n6. Name of the Testing Facility if different from the Manufacturer\n7. Testing Date\n8. Signature and Title of an Authorized Seller's Representative\n\nIf solderability test report is in the form of electronic certifications, then signature is not required.\n\nSeller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment.\n\nNOTE: Seller shall contact the Buyer's Procurement Representative should the material fail solderability testing.\n\nA. For Printed Wiring Boards (PWBs):\n\nTesting shall be performed using the latest revision of J standards available at the execution of this Purchase Order.\n\nSolderability test shall comply with J-STD-003, Class 3, Category 3, unless otherwise specified in the governing purchasing document/drawing. Solder float test is the preferred method. Test samples shall comply with the fabrication specification of Printed Wiring Boards.\n\nAn acceptable solderability test result shall be within six (6) months of the date of delivery to the Buyer from either the Original Component Manufacturer (OCM), the Seller, or by a capable test facility of the Seller's choice.\n\nB. For Components, Lugs, Terminals, Wires and Shields:\n\nTesting shall be performed using the latest revision of J standards available at the execution of this Purchase Order.\n\nTest in accordance with J-STD-002 unless otherwise specified in governing purchasing document (i.e. Source Control Drawing, Altered Item Drawing, Buyer's drawing, or Mil-Specification).\n\nAn acceptable solderability test result shall be within two (2) years of the date of delivery to the Buyer from either the Original Component Manufacturer (OCM), the Seller, or by a capable test facility of the Seller's choice.\n\nWires and Shields shall be tested per J-STD-002, preceded by one (1) hour of steam exposure. When testing shields, the component wires of the cable may be left in place.\n\nComponents, Lugs and Terminals shall be tested per J-STD-002, preceded by pre-conditioning Category C (after eight (8) hours of steam exposure for tin and tin alloy finishes) or pre-conditioning Category A (after one (1) hour for non-tin or non-tin alloy finishes). A minimum of two (2) pieces from each deliverable Lot or Date Code shall be tested. (ex. Electrical components with date code 2201A, 2201B, 2201-CB are still considered D/C 2201).\n\nIn lieu of solderability testing, the Original Component Manufacturer (OCM) may perform Tin/Lead (Sn/Pb) hot solder dip processing within four (4) years of the date of delivery to the Buyer. OCM certification shall be included with each shipment, which states that hot solder dip has been performed and is acceptable. This certification shall include:\n1. Buyer Purchase Order and Line Item Number\n2. Part Number(s)\n3. Original Date Code(s) and/or Lot Number(s)\n4. Quantity\n5. Date of hot solder dip\n6. Date Code(s) after hot solder dip (if applicable)\n7. Signature and Title of OCM Representative"]
["1LM-TS-102","Solderability Testing - Buyer Performed","Articles to be delivered under this Purchase Order are subject to a solderability test upon receipt in accordance with (IAW) the applicable industry standards/specifications. Failure of the parts/components to meet the acceptance criteria of the applicable specification will be cause for rejection.\n\nA minimum of two pieces will be tested.\n\nComponents, Lugs, Terminals and Wires will be tested in accordance with J-STD-002, unless otherwise specified in governing purchasing document (i.e. Source Control Drawing, Altered Item Drawing, or Mil-Specification).\n\nConditioning for Conductors (wires) and shields will be tested IAW the Buyer's cross-functional procedure. When testing shields, the component wires of the cable may be left in place.\n\nConditioning of Components, Lugs and Terminals will be tested IAW Buyer's cross-functional procedure.\n\nPrinted Wiring Boards (PWBs): Solderability test shall comply with J-STD-003 class 3 category 3. Solder float test is the preferred method. Test samples shall comply with the fabrication specification of Printed Wiring Boards.","MFC-TS-002","Articles to be delivered under this Purchase Order are subject to a solderability test upon receipt in accordance with (IAW) the applicable industry standards/specifications. Failure of the parts/components to meet the acceptance criteria of the applicable specification will be cause for rejection.\n\nA minimum of two pieces shall be tested.\n\nStorage life will be applied in accordance with Buyer's cross-functional procedure upon a successful solderability test result.\n\nComponents, Lugs, Terminals and Wires: Test in accordance with J-STD-002, unless otherwise specified in governing purchasing document (i.e. Source Control Drawing, Altered Item Drawing, or Mil-Specification).\n\nConditioning for Conductors (wires) and shields shall be tested IAW the Buyer's cross-functional procedure. When testing shields, the component wires of the cable may be left in place.\n\nConditioning of Components, Lugs and Terminals shall be tested IAW Buyer's cross-functional procedure.\n\nPrinted Wiring Boards (PWBs): Solderability test shall comply with J-STD-003 class 3 category 3. Solder float test is the preferred method. Test samples shall comply with the fabrication specification of Printed Wiring Boards."]
["1LM-TS-103","X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) - Seller Performed","Seller shall submit x-ray technique sheets, x-ray film (or digital copy), and x-ray lab report for Buyer approval prior to shipping the first article. The technique sheet shall identify the method of technique (conventional / digital). The Buyer shall obtain approval from the Lockheed Martin Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Level III. All items shall be permanently marked with the applicable x-ray control number, in accordance with ASTM E 1742 paragraph 6.4. X-rays shall be retained on file by the seller and made available for Buyer's review upon request.\n\nSeller shall notify the Buyer in writing and obtain approval when the specific type of Radiographic/Radioscopic Non Destructive Testing technique/method (wet, DR, CR, DDA, etc.) will need to change from the previously Buyer approved method.\nIf multiple lot date codes are present, the seller shall perform XRF testing for each lot. \n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment.","MFC-DC-012","Seller shall submit x-ray technique sheets, x-ray film (or digital copy), and x-ray lab report for Buyer approval prior to shipping the first article. The technique sheet shall identify the method of technique (conventional / digital). The Buyer shall obtain approval from the Lockheed Martin Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Level III. All items shall be permanently marked with the applicable x-ray control number, in accordance with ASTM E 1742 paragraph 6.4. X-rays shall be retained on file by the seller and made available for Buyer's review upon request.\n\nSeller shall notify the Buyer in writing and obtain approval when the specific type of Radiographic/Radioscopic Non Destructive Testing technique/method (wet, DR, CR, DDA, etc.) will need to change from the previously Buyer approved method.\n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment."]
["1LM-TS-104","X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) - Buyer Performed","Articles to be delivered under this Purchase Order are subject to an X-Ray Fluorescence inspection upon receipt in accordance with the applicable industry standards/specifications. Failure of the parts/components to meet the acceptance criteria of the applicable specification will be cause for rejection.\n\nIf multiple lot date codes are present, the Buyer will perform XRF testing for each lot. ",""]
["1LM-TS-120"," X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) on 5 pcs per lot - Seller performed","Seller shall perform x-ray inspection on a minimum of 5 pieces per lot of material delivered on this purchase order. \n\nSeller shall submit x-ray technique sheets, x-ray film (or digital copy), and x-ray lab report for Buyer approval prior to shipping the first article. The technique sheet shall identify the method of technique (conventional / digital). The Buyer shall obtain approval from the Lockheed Martin Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Level III. All items shall be permanently marked with the applicable x-ray control number, in accordance with ASTM E 1742 paragraph 6.4. X-rays shall be retained on file by the seller and made available for Buyer's review upon request. \n\nSeller shall notify the Buyer in writing and obtain approval when the specific type of Radiographic/Radioscopic Non Destructive Testing technique/method (wet, DR, CR, DDA, etc.) will need to change from the previously Buyer approved method.\n\nThe Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment.","","Seller shall notify the Buyer in writing and obtain approval when the specific type of Radiographic/Radioscopic Non Destructive Testing technique/method (wet, DR, CR, DDA, etc.) will need to change from the previously Buyer approved method."]
["1LM-TS-121"," X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) on 5 pcs per lot - Buyer performed","Articles to be delivered under this Purchase Order are subject to an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) inspection upon receipt in accordance with the applicable industry standards/specifications. Failure of the parts/components to meet the acceptance criteria of the applicable specification will be cause for rejection.\n\nThe buyer will perform XRF on 5 pieces per lot. If multiple lot date codes are present, the Buyer will perform XRF testing for each lot.\n",""]
["1LM-TS-201","Destructive Physical Analysis (DPA) - Supplier Performed","In addition to the normal construction integrity analysis, the Seller shall perform a destructive physical analysis (DPA) as part of the first article. Once accepted by LM, this DPA verification validates all future builds of that part number until any of the following occurs:\nA drawing/revision change affects design attributes\nA Seller tooling/panelization change\nA new first article as required by LM via QR text key\nA construction integrity failure noted at lot acceptance\n\nA production PWB is to be used for the DPA sample. The DPA board chosen for testing shall be selected by the Seller from within the panelization to represent the potential worst case difference of product to panel coupon relationship. DPA sample location shall be selected by the Seller from a representative area of highest design complexity. The Seller shall provide a graphical representation of the panel layout, with the location of the chosen DPA test article noted. Testing shall include thermally stressed (vertical) cross sections of the PWB in the X and Y axis to analyze the construction integrity of representative plated through hole structures in accordance with the applicable performance specification, per the drawing. Multiple plated through hole structures captured in a single mount is acceptable. Results of  the DPA cross section shall be documented on an applicable lot acceptance micro-section lab report with photos.\n\nThe DPA report shall be submitted as a deliverable item with the associated first article. DPA micro-section coupons shall be retained by the Seller in accordance with purchase order record retention requirements. Remnants of the DPA part are not required to be retained.","MFC-TS-011","The Seller shall submit all data and documentation electronically using the Apriso Supplier Portal prior to shipment."]
["1LM-TS-202","Destructive Physical Analysis (DPA) - Buyer Performed","Destructive Physical Analysis (DPA) shall be performed on each Lot Date Code (LDC) of parts listed in this order.","",0]